Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Just War Theory and the current Middle East Crisis  (Read 802 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10512
  • Reputation: +3267/-207
  • Gender: Male
  • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
Just War Theory and the current Middle East Crisis
« on: May 03, 2017, 09:47:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The US Aggression on Syria and the Principles of a “Just War”
    by Prof. Vladislav Sotirovic

    The US military forces committed a classical example of the aggression on one sovereign and independent state on April 6th, 2017 by bombing the territory of Syrian Arab Republic with 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles. Killing civilians who are proclaimed, as usual, as “collateral damage”. A formal excuse for the aggression was based, as many times before (from Vietnam, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya), on traditional political fαℓѕє fℓαgs and mainstream media fake news used by the US propaganda machinery to sanction the Pentagon’s hegemonic policy of the Pax Americana.
    The Fundamental Dilemma
    The fundamental dilemma is why the US administrations of Obama & Trump were and are supporting different kinds of the Islamic fundamentalist jihad organizations in Syria and the Mideast regardless on the fact that they are called by the White House as “moderate terrorists”?

    A terrorist is simply a terrorist and there is no any difference between “moderate” or “hardcore” terrorist if the first term can exist at all from both logical and moral reasons. It is already known that all of those terrorists in Syria, including primarily the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL/DAESH), are armed and sponsored by the US (i.e. Israel) and their regional quisling states (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Kuwait, Qatar…).
    The terrorists’ original warfare of partisan strategy, like by the Muslim Albanian Kosovo Liberation Army in 1995−1999, was based only on direct provoking of the legal and legitimate Syrian state security forces to respond by attacking the terrorists’ posts. Later, well armed and equipped terrorists occupied huge portions of Syria and began establishing full scale of ideological and religious “terror” against the civilians. This simply forced the regular Syrian security forces to launch large scale military actions in order to stop the jihadist terror, and liberate the country from the criminals, but as is expected with unavoidable number of civilian casualties.
    However, these civilian victims are not understood by the White House as a “collateral damage” but rather as the victims of deliberate ethnic cleansing and war crimes committed by the legitimate Syrian Government. Nevertheless, all civilian victims of the US bombing of Syria are (and will be in the future) presented by the US administration exactly as a “collateral damage” of the American “Just War” against the “oppressive” regime in Damascus.
    The Principles of a “Just War” and the American Aggression on Syria
    Here we will present the basic (academic) principles of a “Just War”:
    • Last resort – All diplomatic options are exhausted before the force is used.
    • Just cause – The ultimate purpose of use of force is to self-defend its own territory or people from military attack by the others.
    • Legitimate authority – To imply the legitimate constituted Government of a sovereign state, but not by some private (individual) or group (organization).
    • Right intention – The use of force, or war, had to be prosecuted on the morally acceptable reasons, but not based on revenge or the intention to inflict the damage.
    • Reasonable prospect of success – The use of force should not be activated in some hopeless cause, in which the human lives are exposed for no real benefits.
    • Proportionality – The military intervention has to have more benefits than loses.
    • Discrimination – The use of force must be directed only at the purely military targets as the civilians are considered to be innocent.
    • Proportionality – The used force has to be no greater than it is needed to achieve morally acceptable aims and must not be greater than the provoking cause.
    • Humanity – The use of force can not be directed ever against the enemy personnel if they are captured (the prisoners of war) or wounded.


    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    Re: Just War Theory and the current Middle East Crisis
    « Reply #1 on: May 03, 2017, 09:53:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Nevertheless, if we analyze the last (but probably not the final) US military campaign in regard to above presented basic (academic) principles of a “Just War”, the fundamental conclusions are:
    1. Last Resort – The US administration did not use any real diplomatic effort to settle the Syrian crisis as Washington simply gave the political-military ultimatum only to one side (the Syrian Government) to either accept or not in full required blackmails.
    2. Just Cause – This principle was absolutely misused by Washington as the USA was never attacked or occupied by Syria. The legal Syrian Government is waging a classic anti-terrorist war against the illegal military movements sponsored by the Mideast America’s quisling regimes and the US administration itself. In other words, the second principle of a “Just War” can be only applied to the anti-terroristic operations waged by the state authorities of Syria against the jihad militants and other terrorists rather than to the US military intervention against Syria.
    3. Legitimate Authority – The Legitimate authority principle in the Syrian conflict case can be applied only to Syria and her legitimate state institutions and authority which are recognized as legitimate by the international community and above all by the UN.
    4. Right intention – The morally acceptable reasons officially used by Washington to justify its own military action against Syria are quite unclear and above all unproved and misused for the very political and geostrategic purposes in the coming future. It was the same case with the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999 but today we know that the NATO military campaign was not based on the morally proved claims to stop a mass expulsion of the ethnic Albanians from their homes in Kosovo as a mass number of refugees appeared during the NATO military intervention but not before. If Washington with its Western quislings was lying in the 1999 Kosovo case, it is logically quite expected to lie and today in the case of Syria.
    5. Reasonable prosect of success – The consequences of the fifth principle are selectively applied as only the terrorists will benefited from both short and long term perspectives by the US military engagement in Syria if somebody will not stop further American (in fact Israeli) imperialism in the Mideast.
    6. Proportionality – The sixth principle is also practically applied only to the jihad terrorists in Syria, especially to the Islamic State, what is in fact and the ultimate task of the US policy in the Syrian conflict from its very beginning in 2013. In other words, the benefits of the American military intervention in Syria are overwhelmingly single-sided. From the long-term geostrategic, political as well as economic aspects, the intervention is considered to be very profitable with minimum loses for the US military during the further aggression on Syria.

    7. Discrimination – The practical consequences of the seventh principle is and it is going to be mostly criticized as the US obviously did not make any difference between the military and civilian targets similarly as it was in the case of the aggression on Serbia and Montenegro by the NATO in 1999 when it was even deliberately bombed much more civilian objects and non-combat citizens than the military objects and personnel – something what Syria can expect if Washington will continue with its aggression on the country. In this case, all civilian victims of the bombing of all nationalities will be simply presented by Washington as an unavoidable “collateral damage”, but in fact it is already and probably it will be a clear violation of the international law and one of the basic principles of the concept of a “Just War”.
    8. Proportionality – The eighth principle of a “Just War” surely was not respected by Washington on April 6th, 2017, and it is not going to be respected in the future, as the used force was much higher as needed to achieve proclaimed tasks and above all was much stronger that the opposite side had. However, the morally acceptable aims of the American policymakers are based on the wrong and deliberately misused “fact” in regard to the use of the chemical weapons (ChW) against civilians by the regular Syrian army. In this context, we have to remind ourselves that Washington used the same fαℓѕє fℓαg strategy against Serbia and Montenegro in 1999 when the “brutal massacre of forty-five civilians in the Kosovo village of Račak in January 1999” by the Serbian security forces became a formal pretext for the NATO aggression. Nevertheless, it is known today that those Albanian “brutally massacred civilians” were in fact the members of the terrorist Kosovo Liberation Army killed during the regular fight but not executed as the civilians as it was deliberately presented by the neocon warmongers in Washington.
    9. Humanity – Only the last principle of a “Just War” is respected by the US in the case of the American recent aggression on Syria but for the very reason that there are no captured soldiers from the opponent side. The same case was and concerning the NATO aggression on Serbia and Montenegro in 1999 when the Serbian authorities respected this principle as all (two) NATO captured pilots were treated as the prisoners of war according to the international standards and even were free very soon after the imprisonment.
    Make America a Global Empire Again!
    The US post-WWII imperialistic foreign policy of global hegemony is obviously not to be changed by a new 45th US President who only after three months obliterated all his electoral campaign promises to keep hands off from Syria and to finally stop with the American practice of interventionist policies across the world,
    Unfortunately, the unlimited US imperialism is going to be on agenda and of the 45th American President whose motto “Make America Great Again” is nothing else but only the intention to restore the US role of the post-Cold War global policemen “for behalf of the American people” as it is written on his presidential Twitter account (@POTUS). Therefore, Donald Trump(enstein) as international law breaker and another war criminal in the Oval Office is going to be a good American President like his predecessor Barack Obama the Bomber who created the cινιℓ ωαr in Syria by direct sponsoring the jihad Mideast terrorists.
    Prof. Vladislav B. Sotirovic is a Professor at Institute of Political Sciences Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania and director of the NGO Kosovo-Metochia.


    Offline White Wolf

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +48/-84
    • Gender: Male
    You people have just started down a long road...
    « Reply #2 on: May 04, 2017, 08:49:07 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • For those of you who think US intervention in Syria is just, this icon is appropriate: :fryingpan:

    I started down this road in 1990.  Remember that guy called Saddam?  Remember that rinky-dink country called Kuwait?  (This was back in the dark ages before there was even such a thing as internet access, unless you were a real fancy-pants computer geek and had a phone modem that used to connect by putting an antique device called a handset into a cradle and then doing a series of DOS commands...  oh heck, watch the movie "Wargames"...)  At any rate, that was the start of my awakening.  That was when I discovered that:

    A. 95% of what I learned in school is complete bovine excrement.  Yes, Bismarck is the capitol of N Dakota but no, Pearl Harbor was not a surprise attack and the naval high command made sure all the valuable ships such as the carriers and fast cruisers were out of there so the Japs could sink a bunch of Antiques from WWI.  Yes, George was the first president, but, no, we did not evolve from green monkeys, the earth isn't 4.5 billion, or even 4.5 million, or even 300,000 years old.  Yes, Archduke Ferdinand was shot, but Albert Pike, writing to the grand lodge, predicted WW1, WW2, and WW3, although WW3 is getting a little off track.  (Perhaps the triumph of the Immaculate Heart is on the horizon?)

    B.  There really is a conspiracy orchestrated by Zionist Jєωs.  Well, more accurately, what St John called the "ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan".  Either that, or John Paul Sarte was right, and we might as well learn the laws of physics by studying Bugs Bunny cartoons.

    C.  Participating in the American political system is an utter waste of time.  One would be better off playing chess all day long.  (And please don't lecture me on the duty to vote.  And PLEASE don't quote Pius XII, who was at least as loony as "Good Pope John".)

    D.  It pays to pay real, real, real close attention to what Our Lady said at Fatima.  To paraphrase Vince Lombardi: Fatima ain't everything; it's the only thing.

    If you voted for Donald Trump :facepalm:, you have been NEOCONNED again.  QUIT SMOKING THE HOPIUM AND WAKE UP.

    If you want to get up to speed on real geopolitics, listen to the last ten podcasts/interviews of the Golden Jackass (google it).  

    To make a long story short, all the presidents at least going back to Reagan should be occupying adjacent jail cells, doing life for perjury, treason, murder, embezzlement, fraud, corruption, racketeering, theft, misallocation, and war crimes (whatever exactly that is).  And that if the judge is kind.

    If you in a large city, near a nuclear facility, a military installation, below a dam, or along a major highway, it's time to head for the hills (or at least have a "Bugout" location).

    Getting back to 1991.  It turned out that Saddam's evil henchmen never unplugged incubators and killed babies, never had any intention of invading Saudi Arabia, never gassed Kurds, never even stole candy from a baby.  He did make Iraq the only place in the Middle East where Chaldean Christians were welcome, women could have children in a clean environment, and schoolchildren could drink safe water.  Now, Saddam would never be confused with St Francis, but neither would he be confused with Pol Pot, either.  But the US did bomb schools, slaughter defenseless civilians on the Highway of Death (google it), and committed other sundry atrocities.

    I was asking many questions during the run up to war, as Operation "desert shield" underwent metamorphosis into "desert storm".  That was when I realized that many, many people are  :sleep:, and have their minds made up, and don't want to be confused with the facts.

    Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for Us, you are our only hope.
    Our Lady of Fatima Pray for us you are our only hope!