As if mainstream sources are credible nowadays!!
I am rewriting this post since I inadvertently destroyed it. and will contact Quo Vadis and make sure he stills agrees since of course, it's not identical to what I wrote 4 hours agoI admit, the MSM has had some bad moments. Difference is, generally, these mistakes have been harshely sanctionned by the public.
Per example, the NYT still suffers from it's bad reporting from Judith Miller on Weapons of Mass Destructions, Fox News cannot shake off the well deserved label of being an extension of the Republican Party and CBS is still lost since Dan Rathers blunder on the Bush's record in the National Guard.
All these have been hardly judged and incur financial penalties from the lost of credibility. I suppose they will need to re-earn their trust and that takes time.
That being said, all is not the same for alternative media, and this gets under my skin.
Alternative media usually caters to specific like minded niche of individuals who recognize themselves in the tone and content of those news. In as such, they don't mind innacuracies, unsourced information or even bold face fabrications and lies. To the contrary, they find solace in them and are willing to look the other way when an item turns out wrong.
This kind of looking glass, when it's your only window on the world is very close to outright endoctrination.