Author Topic: In defense of listening to the talking heads. (Read 8638 times)

Belloc · « **Reply #20 on:** July 02, 2010, 07:42:50 AM »

Quote from: Raoul76

Belloc said:
Quote
if we study English secret societies-esp Bacon, raleigh,John Dee,etc and there goals, plus who backed Calvinists in England, then we see their goals were a gnostic, anti-Catholic worhsip and practice, spreading English civilization around the globe, enslavement of others and what they talked about at the time as a NWO......

these are the people that founded modern America, meant to be a new Atlantis of secret learning. Dee and others were big into the Kabbalah.......

LOL at your ignore count... What the hey? Myrna and Trinity are only two people, who else did they enlist?

Anyway, I am impressed that you know about Dee and Bacon and the New Atlantis. My only question WHY ARE YOU NAMED AFTER A BRIT WHO CHAMPIONED THE FRENCH REVOLUTION. Don't make me more paranoid than I already am, my man.

I'm sure that people here know that Dee is the real 007, the real model for James Bond? Bond is supposed to be a sort of robot, a goyim who slavishly serves Elizabeth I's vain goals. Think of the title "Her Majesty's Secret Service."

Also, Dee is the one who helped defeat the Spanish Armada. It is so fascinating how this was done. He was an ambassador, I believe, in the Spanish court, and everything he sent back to England was carefully checked and rechecked. So he wrote a giant book that he pretended was a book of alchemy, but which really was an elaborate set of codes that gave away the positioin of the Spanish fleet! The Spanish let the book through, because of course they thought it was just a harmless eccentric book of nonsense. The result was that the queen of all witches known as Elizabeth was able to take down the dominant Spanish fleet with her pitiful little fleet, catching them off-guard.

This event was what turned the tide for the NWO, hobbling the almighty Catholic power of Spain and building up the Protestant power of England. When the "states" revolted against England then, one could easily assume it was planned between Freemasons, not a real revolt at all. Because the revolutionaries were able to enlist almost everyone in what seemed like a noble cause, the Catholics had their power taken away and had no say in the formation of the new government after the war was over. That is how I believe it went down, anyway.

back in my quasi-libertarian americanist days, recall emailing Tom Woods about the revolution, he is generally pro and he notes that Masons themselves were divided, truly divided on the revolt, why the USA revolution to me is a partial Masonic victory, unlike French that was full.....again, many for yrs were ignorant or confused on the motives and players....

Belloc · « **Reply #21 on:** July 02, 2010, 07:54:07 AM »

I was just :roll-laugh1:

after me leaving yesterday, some of the lurkers-not-poster and TrinaMyrna PM back and forth vigorously arranging ignoring me......all the while swearing ignoring is childish,yadayada.....

too funny, but sometimes truth and bursting the bubble can hurt I guess...

as noted yesterday, some will hide the drunken mothers' indiscreations adn defend her "no she aint drunk".

oh well, guess when you want to save the nation, you are a hater.....Catholic social order?? hey, that will never work, hence will not even have the courage to try....funner and less committal to say it wont work....

defend Americanism, but be a SV-very double minded....

happily, I see most SV here are not falling for that-Raoul, Dawn, possibly GV, who I have respected and interacted with for yrs, here and at FE.....

but, they answer nothing, they accused, no proof, no rebuttal worthy of the name, no shred of support-if TrinaMyrna want to block me, then great....or is it Myrnatrina?

anyhow, they are a pair.... :roll-laugh1:

on to serious discussions....

Belloc · « **Reply #22 on:** July 02, 2010, 08:05:34 AM »

Quote from: henry

I wonder why Michael Hoffman is pro-founding fathers and pro-America.

welcome, you get a chance, intro yourself if you have not yet...

henry · « **Reply #23 on:** July 02, 2010, 11:28:04 AM »

Thank you Raoul! Glad to be here.

Hoffman is an odd bird, but very interesting.

Quote from: Raoul76

Welcome to the forum, henry.

henry said:
Quote
I wonder why Michael Hoffman is pro-founding fathers and pro-America.

And pro-religious liberty!

Okay, if you want to talk explicit Americanism -- and not just American patriotism that may or may not be implicit Americanism -- Michael Hoffman is a prime example. Someone should pin him down and ask him if he thinks Prots can be saved. I bet he does.

henry · « **Reply #24 on:** July 02, 2010, 11:28:44 AM »

Quote from: Belloc

Quote from: henry
I wonder why Michael Hoffman is pro-founding fathers and pro-America.

welcome, you get a chance, intro yourself if you have not yet...

Just did. TY!