Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: In defense of listening to the talking heads.  (Read 8640 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

In defense of listening to the talking heads.
« Reply #30 on: July 06, 2010, 07:12:12 AM »
Quote from: Patman
Quote from: Trinity
But I contend that it is up to the individual to make that choice.  One person should not arrogantly order another person's life for them.

What "choice" is that, specifically?


ask Trinity-does not the Church "order another persons life" all the time? Does she not place limits and rules in place?-or is certain areas exempt? (GOP, Limbaugh, capitalism, nationalism)

In defense of listening to the talking heads.
« Reply #31 on: July 06, 2010, 07:45:51 AM »
Quote from: Trinity
But I contend that it is up to the individual to make that choice.  One person should not arrogantly order another person's life for them.

No one has the right to do evil. Government has the duty to enforce God's laws. A government that does not enforce God's laws is unjust. Governments cannot be neutral, they must be biased on the side of God, making it easy for their people to be good and making it difficult for them to be evil. Parents do not give their children vegetables and poison and ask them to choose what they want to eat for dinner. They "arrogantly order" their children to eat their vegetables.


In defense of listening to the talking heads.
« Reply #32 on: July 06, 2010, 07:53:12 AM »
Quote from: Matto
Quote from: Trinity
But I contend that it is up to the individual to make that choice.  One person should not arrogantly order another person's life for them.

No one has the right to do evil. Government has the duty to enforce God's laws. A government that does not enforce God's laws is unjust. Governments cannot be neutral, they must be biased on the side of God, making it easy for their people to be good and making it difficult for them to be evil. Parents do not give their children vegetables and poison and ask them to choose what they want to eat for dinner. They "arrogantly order" their children to eat their vegetables.


 :applause:

now prepare for her to tell you you hate America and are a sad sack as you did not get cathecism in the 50's (by nuns that were taught to ignore the warnings against Americanism and even to promote it)....you will be told you are too young and ill informed.....

In defense of listening to the talking heads.
« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2010, 08:56:51 AM »
Quote from: Belloc
Quote from: Patman
Quote from: Trinity
But I contend that it is up to the individual to make that choice.  One person should not arrogantly order another person's life for them.

What "choice" is that, specifically?


ask Trinity-does not the Church "order another persons life" all the time? Does she not place limits and rules in place?-or is certain areas exempt? (GOP, Limbaugh, capitalism, nationalism)

Although "the Chuirch" is not "one person". I still don't know what this is all about.

In defense of listening to the talking heads.
« Reply #34 on: July 07, 2010, 09:07:48 AM »
The "one person" I was referring to was Belloc.  He was bashing Myrna for listen to Glenn Beck.  There's more to the story, but that is enough for a reference.  According to Belloc, one may only listen to those he approves of.