Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Hal Turner put up a link to Bishop Williamson statement on Ukraine conflict  (Read 2547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



Offline epiphany

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3542
  • Reputation: +1097/-875
  • Gender: Male
The idiot calls Williamson:
"an Archbishop speaking from the Altar in the Church of England..."


Offline Minnesota

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1804
  • Reputation: +943/-462
  • Gender: Male
The idiot calls Williamson:
"an Archbishop speaking from the Altar in the Church of England..."
He doesn't source or fact-check a damn thing. I wouldn't expect him to get this one right either.
Christ is Risen! He is risen indeed

Offline Sir Percival

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • Reputation: +43/-26
  • Gender: Male
  • Traditional Roman Catholic
    • Pope Urban II - Crusades
His Excellency’s endorsement of Putin is a big huge humongous gigantic MASSIVE fumble.

Why choose sides? Putin’s a slave of the Jєωs and he sucks for Catholics and so do his enemies so why can’t I just dislike both and be an enemy to both?

It’s like being told to choose whether dying by firing squad is better than suffocating or burning to death. Sure, I can see the point but I am not a fan of the premise. :fryingpan:
“How can the ignorant teach others? How can the licentious make others modest? And how can the impure make others pure? If anyone hates peace, how can he make others peaceable ? Or if anyone has soiled his hands with baseness, how can he cleanse the impurities of another? We read also that if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the ditch [Matt. 15:14]. But first correct yourselves, in order that, free from blame , you may be able to correct those who are subject to you.”

Pope Urban II

Offline DigitalLogos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8316
  • Reputation: +4706/-754
  • Gender: Male
  • Slave to the Sacred Heart
    • Twitter
His Excellency’s endorsement of Putin is a big huge humongous gigantic MASSIVE fumble.

Why choose sides? Putin’s a slave of the Jєωs and he sucks for Catholics and so do his enemies so why can’t I just dislike both and be an enemy to both?

It’s like being told to choose whether dying by firing squad is better than suffocating or burning to death. Sure, I can see the point but I am not a fan of the premise. :fryingpan:
Careful with that completely true statement, there's some around here who have fallen into the trap of Team Russia vs. Team Globohomo

The idiot calls Williamson:
"an Archbishop speaking from the Altar in the Church of England..."
Hal Turner is terrible. Why does anyone listen to this guy?
"Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

"In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

"A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]


Offline Minnesota

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1804
  • Reputation: +943/-462
  • Gender: Male
He doesn't cite anything... That is day 1, hour 1, class 1 of writing classes, period.

And ever since I found out that he wrote things that genuinely put people in danger, he's been on my "avoid" list.
Christ is Risen! He is risen indeed

Offline Incredulous

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
  • Reputation: +8675/-849
  • Gender: Male
His Excellency’s endorsement of Putin is a big huge humongous gigantic MASSIVE fumble.

Why choose sides? Putin’s a slave of the Jєωs and he sucks for Catholics and so do his enemies so why can’t I just dislike both and be an enemy to both?

It’s like being told to choose whether dying by firing squad is better than suffocating or burning to death. Sure, I can see the point but I am not a fan of the premise. :fryingpan:
Putin needed a trad Catholic endorsement and +W needed the publicity.  :facepalm:
"Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

Offline angelusmaria

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 473
  • Reputation: +279/-51
  • Gender: Male
Lawyer: FBI Paid Right-Wing Blogger Charged With Threats

 "[Hal Turner] was secretly an FBI “agent provocateur” paid to disseminate right-wing rhetoric, his attorney said Wednesday. "

https://www.wired.com/2009/08/lawyer-fbi-paid-right-wing-blogger-charged-with-threats/
please pray for me


Offline josefamenendez

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4421
  • Reputation: +2946/-199
  • Gender: Female
Everyone knows Hal was an FBI informant and ATTF member. That didn't stop the FEDS from throwing him in jail for 2 years. All this proves is that he probably has great animus towards TPTB in the government that did that to him, but also that he still maintains great insider connections and info.

Re: Bishop Williamson being an "Archbishop from the Church of England"- Hal probably is only aware of the Bishop from the tweet. At least he acknowledged the Bishop, however poorly, which is a heck of a lot more that any Vatican or NO venue will do. You will be surprised the reach that short video will get- maybe  even some converts. (see today's Eleison Comments)

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41862
  • Reputation: +23919/-4344
  • Gender: Male
Putin needed a trad Catholic endorsement and +W needed the publicity.  :facepalm:

More of your active imagination at work.  Never has Bishop Williamson said things just to seek publicity.  He's been very consistent about supporting Putin, and his support is sincere.  And why would Putin care about a Trad Cath endorsement?  From his perspective, this is just tiny sect offshoot of Roman Catholicism.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
More of your active imagination at work.  Never has Bishop Williamson said things just to seek publicity.  He's been very consistent about supporting Putin, and his support is sincere.  And why would Putin care about a Trad Cath endorsement?  From his perspective, this is just tiny sect offshoot of Roman Catholicism.

You are on a roll, friend, and see the matter with great perspicacity.

Thank you for your efforts in rebutting these smear campaigns.
Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41862
  • Reputation: +23919/-4344
  • Gender: Male
Well, they think that just throwing the term "Opus Dei" out there proves their narrative, just as the anti-Putinites throw "Dugin" and "Duginism" out there.  Great.  "Opus Dei" is not good.  Where's the evidence that +Vigano is an OD agent other than that he knows a couple people who happen to be in OD?  Where's a credible Cui bono?  Any decent conspiracy theory must establish a credible cui bono? even to qualify as a conspiracy theory.  As I said, I've known people in OD myself.  Ah, that must be why I'm defending +Vigano, because I'm part of the consiracy since I knew some guys who were in OD (and I rejected their invitations to come check them out).

This reminds me of the narrative about Bishop Williamson being a Rosicrucian.  Could he be?  I suppose it's theoretically possible.  But where's the evidence beside a "rose and a cross" on his coat of arms?  I guess St. Therese was a Rosicrucian also, because she's always dected with a cross or crucifix surrounded by roses.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
Well, they think that just throwing the term "Opus Dei" out there proves their narrative, just as the anti-Putinites throw "Dugin" and "Duginism" out there.  Great.  "Opus Dei" is not good.  Where's the evidence that +Vigano is an OD agent other than that he knows a couple people who happen to be in OD?  Where's a credible Cui bono?  Any decent conspiracy theory must establish a credible cui bono? even to qualify as a conspiracy theory.  As I said, I've known people in OD myself.  Ah, that must be why I'm defending +Vigano, because I'm part of the consiracy since I knew some guys who were in OD (and I rejected their invitations to come check them out).

This reminds me of the narrative about Bishop Williamson being a Rosicrucian.  Could he be?  I suppose it's theoretically possible.  But where's the evidence beside a "rose and a cross" on his coat of arms?  I guess St. Therese was a Rosicrucian also, because she's always dected with a cross or crucifix surrounded by roses.

Agreed.

You’d think that if someone was going to make those kinds of allegations, they’d be able to point to some unorthodox doctrinal statements within Viganò’s many writings to support the controlled resistance narrative.

Instead, one person objected to his appearance at a certain political rally last year, another objected to what he isn’t saying, and a third doesn’t reference his writings at all.

So it would seem that the reason we’re all supposed to reject the traditional  antidote Vigano is injecting into the conciliar disease is...what, exactly?

Hardly anyone outside of the Novus Ordo Watch orbit has made any doctrinal objection to anything he’s said, and even on this forum, most sedes (of whatever stripe) like what he’s saying.

I’m just not sure why anyone has a problem with him (consecration notwithstanding).

Hell, if Opus Judei actually taught what Vigano is teaching, they’d be traditionalists too.

The old maxim is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

But here, there isn’t any evidence at all.

To me, the opposition is a head scratcher, and so far as NOW is concerned, I can’t help thinking that whatever they say on their website, there’s plenty of Nicodemus’s among them too.
Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

Offline epiphany

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3542
  • Reputation: +1097/-875
  • Gender: Male
More of your active imagination at work.  Never has Bishop Williamson said things just to seek publicity.  He's been very consistent about supporting Putin, and his support is sincere.  And why would Putin care about a Trad Cath endorsement?  From his perspective, this is just tiny sect offshoot of Roman Catholicism.
But what if Putin thinks Williamson is "an Archbishop speaking from the Altar in the Church of England..."?

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41862
  • Reputation: +23919/-4344
  • Gender: Male
But what if Putin thinks Williamson is "an Archbishop speaking from the Altar in the Church of England..."?

Only Hal Turner thinks that ... probably just doesn't know the difference.  He just saw a bishop speaking from England with a British accent.