Author Topic: Bush warned us about leaving Iraq (Read 3370 times)

Petertherock · « **on:** September 06, 2014, 08:07:47 AM »

President Bush was prophetic when he warned what would happen if we left Iraq before the commanders on the ground say it's time. I might also add, we are about to make the same mistake in Afghanistan which will give the terrorists two places to operate out of along with Syria...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/nbLEDNIe6n0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]

2Vermont · « **Reply #1 on:** September 06, 2014, 08:11:33 AM »

Thank you for posting this. It's the first time I'm seeing someone bring this up. I have been thinking about President Bush and our leaving Iraq.

2Vermont · « **Reply #2 on:** September 06, 2014, 08:19:18 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Thank you for posting this. It's the first time I'm seeing someone bring this up. I have been thinking about President Bush and our leaving Iraq.

And whoa...just noticed the time I posted that....

BTNYC · « **Reply #3 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:06:35 AM »

Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

BTNYC · « **Reply #4 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:16:55 AM »

Here are some pictures of your "prophet" for you to enjoy, Pete.

s2srea · « **Reply #5 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:25:08 AM »

Exactly BTNYC; Did anyone else notice that Sadam, not to call him a saint, at the very least kept order in Iraq. If his own Sunni's dared touch the Christians in the country, he would punish them with fierce intensity. Now look what we're left with- the Shia's took over the country by numbers, f'd up the Sunnis for when they were in power, Christians too, then the Sunnis created ISIS from being under the gun of the Shia's for so long, and we have the mess we're in. Yes- thanks President Bush, you masonic scuмbag. Please people- no more fox news .

BTNYC · « **Reply #6 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:41:47 AM »

Some more images of the holy prophet:

If only the Prophet were still in office instead of the current president, who is utterly unlike him in every way...

Oh wait....

2Vermont · « **Reply #7 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:43:35 AM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

BTNYC · « **Reply #8 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:51:36 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Quote from: BTNYC
Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

Explain, please.

Christians were left alone under Saddam Hussein. That's an objective fact.

Bush invaded Iraq with no tangible reason another objective fact.

The ISIS disaster could not have occurred without that illegal invasion. Another objective fact.

Explain to me how this Zionist NWO-er is a "prophet."

2Vermont · « **Reply #9 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:54:31 AM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

Explain, please.

Your desire to place blame on Bush for going to Iraq in the first place is just as wrong as calling him a prophet for not leaving. Both sides would like to simplify the situation.

BTNYC · « **Reply #10 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:57:47 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

Explain, please.

Your desire to place blame on Bush for going to Iraq in the first place is just as wrong as calling him a prophet for not leaving. Both sides would like to simplify the situation.

See the amended version of my post.

This invasion of Iraq was unjust and unjustifiable. The ISIS invasion would not have been possible under the Saddam regime. Are you seriously going to argue against that?

So now the OP is "simplistic?" Where was that criticism before? All I saw was "thanks for posting that."

2Vermont · « **Reply #11 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:58:16 AM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

Explain, please.

Christians were left alone under Saddam Hussein. That's an objective fact.

Bush invaded Iraq with no tangible reason another objective fact.

The ISIS disaster could not have occurred without that illegal invasion. Another objective fact.

Explain to me how this Zionist NWO-er is a "prophet."

How do you know without a doubt that this could not possibly have happened anyway?

2Vermont · « **Reply #12 on:** September 06, 2014, 10:59:41 AM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

Explain, please.

Your desire to place blame on Bush for going to Iraq in the first place is just as wrong as calling him a prophet for not leaving. Both sides would like to simplify the situation.

See the amended version of my post.

This invasion of Iraq was unjust and unjustifiable. The ISIS invasion would not have been possible under the Saddam regime. Are you seriously going to argue against that?

So now the OP is "simplistic?" Where was that criticism before? All I saw was "thanks for posting that."

Oh, so people can't change how they view a post? Give me a break. I am assigning some validity to your concern about the OP, but I'm not buying that you are the one with the answers.

BTNYC · « **Reply #13 on:** September 06, 2014, 11:00:35 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

Explain, please.

Christians were left alone under Saddam Hussein. That's an objective fact.

Bush invaded Iraq with no tangible reason another objective fact.

The ISIS disaster could not have occurred without that illegal invasion. Another objective fact.

Explain to me how this Zionist NWO-er is a "prophet."

How do you know without a doubt that this could not possibly have happened anyway?

Because ISIS took advantage of a power vacuum that only existed because the Saddam dictatorship was removed.

BTNYC · « **Reply #14 on:** September 06, 2014, 11:05:20 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: BTNYC
Is this a joke?

This Masonic scuмbag created this mess by invading Iraq in the first place.

You know what would have prevented the slaughter of innocent Christians in Iraq? Leaving Saddam Hussein in power. He was the best possible ruler we could hope to have for a nation like that - hostile to Islamic extremists and tolerant of Christians.

But no. He was a threat to Israel so, as usual, the masonic puppet did his Yehudi masters' bidding and "smoked him out."

And now he's being called a "prophet?"

If someone places a starving cat on a leash in a chicken coop and tells you "Something bad is probably going to happen to these chickens if I let go of the leash on this cat that I placed in the coop myself" - is that really a "prophecy?"

Maybe... I guess... If you're retarded. Or a Neocon "Christian" Zionist.

On second thought, that's six of one, half dozen of the other.

Perhaps neither view is accurate. Yours is just as simplistic as the other.

Explain, please.

Your desire to place blame on Bush for going to Iraq in the first place is just as wrong as calling him a prophet for not leaving. Both sides would like to simplify the situation.

See the amended version of my post.

This invasion of Iraq was unjust and unjustifiable. The ISIS invasion would not have been possible under the Saddam regime. Are you seriously going to argue against that?

So now the OP is "simplistic?" Where was that criticism before? All I saw was "thanks for posting that."

Oh, so people can't change how they view a post? Give me a break. I am assigning some validity to your concern about the OP, but I'm not buying that you are the one with the answers.

Good. Don't buy it. I'm not selling it.

I'm merely making some common sense observations based on the known Masonic, NWO leanings of the Zionist former president and his actions in the theater of war, which make very little sense without taking those associations into consideration.

I think you, on the other hand, are being a loudmouthed contrarian female with a bruised ego.