Author Topic: America is Insane (Read 2589 times)

Binechi · « **on:** June 18, 2013, 06:55:51 AM »

http://www.infowars.com/washington-is-insane/

Binechi · « **Reply #1 on:** June 18, 2013, 07:22:56 AM »

Correction... Washington insane, Not America insane .. Sorry !

Donachie · « **Reply #2 on:** June 18, 2013, 10:40:54 AM »

Pardon me, this may not be the right place to make this opinion, but I am an American.

This is my opinion, which is based in factual evidence I discovered through the internet. I'm not running a think-take or an archive so I didn't copy it, and I haven't been googling around about it lately, but someone else may do the research.

I've discovered there are people out there who do very good research.

My point is that Janet Napolitano, Nancy Peℓσѕι, and Joe Biden are al Jєωιѕн. So were Winston Churchill, FDR, and Stalin(Djugashvili, Jєωison, "Koba", "Bar Kokhba", Son of the Star, the red star no less.

Oh well, not such a big deal. Am I that crazy to be on the alert about marranos?

Donachie · « **Reply #3 on:** June 18, 2013, 10:46:45 AM »

Besides crazy, I might just be plain obnoxious. I will talk about the Jєωs sometimes.

Alex Jones is a Jєω too. Check his genealogy, and he's married to a Jєωess no less. He blames everything on nαzι's!

It's the nαzι's who did 9-11, BP, and the Banks, and Bilderberg, etc., and the Foucault pendulum at the UN! It's the nαzι's who run NASA and steal you for billions and billions!

He's disinfo, imo. You may get some fraction of the truth out of the pipes over there, but it will be tainted by his propaganda slant. Alex Jones is practically a nαzι hunter.

They're all hiding down in Argentina and Bolivia and Paraguay. What's he doing in Austin, Texas?

Hatchc · « **Reply #4 on:** June 20, 2013, 01:14:13 PM »

Where's your evidence that Churchill and FDR were Jєωιѕн?

I've always taken them for useful idiots, but not cryptos.

Donachie · « **Reply #5 on:** June 20, 2013, 10:12:45 PM »

The internet can be a peculiar place. I am unable to find the same information as before, which was well enough researched for me, but I have been able to find this.

‘Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jєωιѕн genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill, née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.’

Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post

Churchill's mother was from a well connected and wealthy New York Jєωιѕн family. How marrano they were is relevant to the nature of the case. For example, Nancy Peℓσѕι is marrano all the way, and she's completely Jєωιѕн while she pretends to be Italian Catholic. Go figure.

http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/churchil.html

I am not heretical in the Catholic sense, and I do not know who made this website.

She said she was part Iroquois but she looks a little Lewinsky to me.

http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Jennie_Jerome

http://www.Jєωwatch.com/Jєω-leaders-churchill.html

http://www.Jєωwatch.com/Jєω-leaders-roosevelt.html

Nobody else came up succinctly except this horribly anti-Semitic website "Jєωwatch".

John Kerry? Irish Catholic. No, more like Churchill and Roosevelt.

Arbogastes · « **Reply #6 on:** June 25, 2013, 12:05:52 AM »

Quote from: Hatchc

Where's your evidence that Churchill and FDR were Jєωιѕн?

I've always taken them for useful idiots, but not cryptos.

That's not as relevant. The more relevant fact is that both were high-ranking freemasons (as were two of FDR's vice presidents and George VI).

Gloria · « **Reply #7 on:** June 25, 2013, 03:24:10 AM »

Quote from: Donachie

My point is that Janet Napolitano, Nancy Peℓσѕι, and Joe Biden are al Jєωιѕн. So were Winston Churchill, FDR, and Stalin(Djugashvili, Jєωison, "Koba", "Bar Kokhba", Son of the Star, the red star no less.

Oh well, not such a big deal. Am I that crazy to be on the alert about marranos?

Just to clarify - where did you get info, that Stalin was a Jєω?
Seriously unbelievable. Firstly, he was accepted into seminary, which would be difficult in Russia back then if he was a Jєω.

Secondly, he was from a poor family, his parents were not educated at university - and he lived in area, where no Jєωs were allowed to live unless they were professionals. Plus, Stalin was not fond of Jєωs at all and persecuted a lot of them.

Maizar · « **Reply #8 on:** June 25, 2013, 04:40:27 AM »

Quote from: Gloria

Quote from: Donachie

My point is that Janet Napolitano, Nancy Peℓσѕι, and Joe Biden are al Jєωιѕн. So were Winston Churchill, FDR, and Stalin(Djugashvili, Jєωison, "Koba", "Bar Kokhba", Son of the Star, the red star no less.

Oh well, not such a big deal. Am I that crazy to be on the alert about marranos?

Just to clarify - where did you get info, that Stalin was a Jєω?
Seriously unbelievable. Firstly, he was accepted into seminary, which would be difficult in Russia back then if he was a Jєω.

Secondly, he was from a poor family, his parents were not educated at university - and he lived in area, where no Jєωs were allowed to live unless they were professionals. Plus, Stalin was not fond of Jєωs at all and persecuted a lot of them.

http://books.google.at/books/about/The_secret_file_of_Joseph_Stalin.html?id=zQL8POkFGIQC&redir_esc=y

Joseph Stalin, according to the above linked book, was a bastard child, fathered by an Orthodox priest of a physically abused mother. Her husband was a Jєωιѕн shoe smith, infertile, alcoholic and jealous of his son whom he .must have guessed was illegitimate. Thus Stalin had an abusive childhood. He was accepted as probably Jєωιѕн by the communists because of his surname and could have passed off as one by imitating what he learnt from his father.

On the other hand he was possibly an Okhrana agent (Tzarist secret police), having mixed allegiances. This is consistent with his childhood abuse which often results in paradoxes and contradictions in the human personality that are otherwise nearly impossible to carry off.

It's an interesting analysis and based in part on more recent revelations after the collapse of the Soviet Union. It's plausible, but then again so is every other biography I have read about him

Maizar · « **Reply #9 on:** June 25, 2013, 04:55:30 AM »

For completeness, Stalins entry into the seminary was explained as an attempt by his mother to put him onto the straight-and-narrow, and also for him to be in the vicinity of his biological father. Stalin already had developed advanced criminal psychopathy by that stage and so this strategy failed dismally.

Gloria · « **Reply #10 on:** June 25, 2013, 05:04:40 AM »

Again, where Stalin was from - no "Jєωιѕн shoemaker" was possible, it was outside of line of settlement allowed to Jєωs in Russia before revolution. "Shvilli" - is son in Georgian last names, however "Dzugha" is not a Jєω in Gergian and nothing similar at all. Statins father last name was actually Djugaev, but was changed a bit to Gergian manner as many Ossetians were marked as Georgians if they were Christians and not Muslims.

I could easily believe that Lenin was a Jєω, but Stalin - very very unlikely. Just makes all the claims in original topic look a bit cheap, to be honest.

Arbogastes · « **Reply #11 on:** June 25, 2013, 05:10:24 AM »

Stalin may also had some type of connection with the freemasons, although I haven't been able to yet find any information confirming that. The Grand Orient branch of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ (based in France) seemed to have had some involvement with the Bolsheviks, but I have found out little else other than that.

It wouldn't surprise me if there was a connection.

Any thoughts?

Maizar · « **Reply #12 on:** June 25, 2013, 07:42:05 AM »

Stalin's father, if he was Jєωιѕн, would have been rejected by the Jєωs for pairing with a Christian woman, so it's still possible that he was (and Georgia has a large Jєωιѕн population), but I get your point. I'm not a historian. It's interesting but not critical. There is not a lot of evidence, hence the speculation.

I doubt actually that Stalin was in a lodge. The curious thing for me is that he was accepted and promoted amongst his Jєωιѕн peers in the Party. His possible Jєωιѕнness might have been a concoction of his own to gain influence. A crypto-gentile of sorts?

Donachie · « **Reply #13 on:** June 25, 2013, 05:01:48 PM »

Quote from: Arbogastes

Stalin may also had some type of connection with the freemasons, although I haven't been able to yet find any information confirming that. The Grand Orient branch of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ (based in France) seemed to have had some involvement with the Bolsheviks, but I have found out little else other than that.

It wouldn't surprise me if there was a connection.

Any thoughts?

"Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყwatch" has tagged Stalin as a Freemason, and I'm fully convinced he was a Jєω. Besides other reasons, he looks like Sacha Baron Cohen, aka "Borat".

Intuition and common sense are primary forms of knowledge, imo, and it makes no sense that a Georgian Orthodox seminary drop-out, who would not also be a marrano, could possible sit securely enthroned over an anti-Christian killing scheme like the Soviet Union, and also be befriended by international British and American capital.

As far as secession and the NWO, I think Jesus was a Confederate at heart. Look at the simple diocesan and parish organization of the Church.

The Church is organized in a constitutional and lawful way that respects local privileges and rights. It is a diocesan and parish structure. It is not totalitarian or iconoclastic.

France before the French Revolution had a tradition of many local rights and privileges that were only expunged by the radical atheists of the revolution.

"Domine, non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum", is a little bit ironic, because while one may not be worthy that Jesus enters under his roof, Jesus fully respects private property rights, local privileges, tradtions, and how people run their homes in accordance with grace and nature. etc.

Gloria · « **Reply #14 on:** June 26, 2013, 01:48:02 AM »

That is the problem, when unchecked info all put in one big pile and it starts all look too doubtful.

Stalin did not look like a Jєω for a start, he looks like a fairly typical man from Caucasus region - A Georgian or Osetin. Secondly, Stalin persecuted Jєωs along with many other nationalities. Jєωs in Russia are not fond of Stalin at all. And there's still a question about him being accepted into a seminary.