CathInfo.com

And Bishop Williamson thought Garabandal was true.  It was certainly more credible than Akita.

Yet Joey Lomangino is dead, Padre Pio is long dead and would be 133 and we are on Pope number 5.

He does not talk about Garabandal any longer and has not since Lomangino's death.

Conchita CLEARLY does not know the date of the miracle.  Or she is unreliable AND completely useless at basic arithmetic. 

A Japanese nun who goes to the new mass, sees a statue to a false vision in Amsterdam weeping "tears" and they all claim it is a miracle.
Then a modernist Bishop approves it.
Japanese people are a touch too emotional for me.  Crazy people.
Approved by the Bishop.  So what?  John Paul and Paul VI are "saints" too.  But I think they are BOTH in Hell.
I believe in Fatima.

You simplify it too much.  

There are some key details to discern:

1. Card Ratzinger stated the Japanese are 20 years behind Europe in adapting to changes in the liturgy.  

2. 1973 was when Akita started and Sr. Sasegawa was a convert novice at the time of the first apparition.

3. While the Japanese woodcarver who made the weeping statue was commissioned to model it after “Our Lady of All Nations” , the whole set of miracles had nothing to do with Amsterdam.

I’m in agreement that the jewess who started The Amsterdam cult was a fraud.

4. Our Lady of Akita’s messages were hard hitting.  No nicey Novus ordo talk there.  In fact, it was more severe than Fatima.

BTW, There is a growing cult of sedes & trads that believe the Fatima consecration was done in 1952.

Botched as it was, they think we’ve had the era of peace during the last 70 years and that we’re going into chastisement next.  We can forget about Russia converting and destroying the Jєωιѕн mafia.

Those same people should study Akita.   Our Lady is very severe in foretelling that the fires will be worse than the Deluge... unless they convert.

They can put that in their pipes and smoke it.  
 

Events foretold by Our Lady of Fatima already happened.

The Fatima cultists cling on to this past and live their lives waiting for it to happen. Just look what happened in the 20th century. How can you not see it already happened? But you don't want to move on, do you?

I agree. I believe Pope Pius XII did do the Consecration, imperfectly, much like King Louis XVI did the consecration of France to the Sacred Heart in his cell during the Revolution. But, it was too late, and while it was done, the forecasted chastisements still occurred.

Had it been done by Pius XI, we might live in a very, very different world today. And now I believe the temporal effects of this failure have manifested into what the "Church" is today and the world is transforming into.