I also agree with you. Vigano's involvement with the ReAwaken America tour, which many speakers are New Age, and his constant endorsement of Trump is very disturbing to me. He never called on those participating to the conversion to the true faith or condemned Trumps pro-sodimite, pro-Israel, pro-abortion stances. He focuses on a deep state and deep church as the boogie men rather than our personal sins which cry out to God for vengeance. My personal opinion is he may be an infiltrator into the resistance and sedevacantists camps. By throwing out some traditional Catholic statements, he makes himself appear traditional. Of course, this is only my opinion and I truly pray for strong Catholic leaders to preach true Catholic dogma.
That's all nonsense, more narrative from the slanderers. He gave a 5-minute pre-recorded video talk to what was primarily a political rally, about a specific topic.
I called out the lies earlier about his forcus on political things rather than spiritual ... slanderer who have not read his body of works, but takes 2-minute clips out of context from the rest of his work to smear him with. This clown clumniator says he talks about nothing other than politics, and never talks about sin or theology, and I posted links to his 5 volumes of sermons following the Liturgical Year, and postsed his last one on Christmas, where he called out all the sins that this same slanderous clown listed as his "NEVER" talking about.
Do I need to post his sermons again, showing precisely where he's condemned one sin after another? No, I shouldn't have to, since you should have done the research before spewing your slanders and your lies. Go actually learn about what he's said, taught, etc. ... before spewing slander on internet forums.
Your "personal opinion" is nothing but slander. You're just a bunch of liars who make this crap up without knowing anything about what he spends most of his time speaking about. He takes 2 minutes to speak on behalf of someone jailed for opposing the Plandemic, and now that's ALL he talks about. You could find 30-minute talks from Bishop Williamson about political isues, FAR MORE time than +Vigano has ever spent on them.
He's infiltrated nothing, you liar ... with very little connection to any other groups, other than having sought conditional consecration from Bishop Wiliamson. He has no ongoing relationship with any group. He's done absolutely nothing to draw people away from these groups, not "converted" a single sedevacantist or R&R to ... to what? I don't even know what he'd be converting them to, or what he's accomplished.
If he's controlled opposition infiltrator ... he's got to be the lamest controlled opposition gatekeeper in the history of controlled opposition infiltrators. Least he could have done was to not be conditionally ordained and then start ordaining some Trad priests, and start drawing vocations from SSPX and SV seminaries, etc. He's dont absolutely nothing as an "infilitrator".
As for his support of Trump, despite the narrative of his slanderers, he's made a total of 3-4 statements about Trump, most of which, if you look at the diplomatic language, were simply calculated to tug on Trump's ego in order to get him to move in the right direction. He's a trained diplomat and knows that Trump has a yuge ego that can be manipulated. If you look at what he wrote in that one letter the sladerers pounce on, he made some very-well crafted statements that appealed to Trump's ego while saying that he "dared hope" that Trump was sincere, motivated by good, etc. He knows that if you criticize Trump, he'll just double down in the opposite direction of the criticism, since that's just who the guy is. But there's nothing even remotely egregious about his support for Trump, and again it's more people who take the 3 or 4 sentences he's said on the matter out of context.
And, to the extent he did support Trump, he was wrong. I was practically shouted won off this forum, while Matthew allowed Conciliar trolls to come in here shilling for Trump, and was himself shiling for Trump, and then celebrating when Trump got elected. So is Matthew also an infiltrator? Or just wrong? I was told that all Trad priests contradicted me and that therefore I was wrong to oppose Trump. So even long-standing Trad priests were out there promoting a vote for Trump and butchering Catholic moral theology to do so. Maybe they're all infiltrators too. Or ... they're just wrong.