No, it's not about "offense" but about truth, justice vs. detraction and calumny. What's a "scandal" is for radical SV mini-popes to declare +Vigano for no legitimate reason whatsoever.
Has your hatred for the man also crippled your brain where you take a clip that's under 2 minutes and conclude from that that, what?, it's the only thing he's every talked about and that he hasn't addressed other issues? You could find 20-minute clips of Bishop Williamson talking about Oklahoma City, about Putin / Ukraine, 9/11, the h0Ɩ0h0αx, etc.
So bishops are not allowed to take 2 minutes out of their day to make a statement about a lawyer who was imprisoned for attempting to expose the COVID hoax?
Will you give him permission to use the toilet ... given that there are millions on the way to hell?
Are you insane?
What's wrong with some of you people?
Archbishop Vigano publishes his sermons online, and various other writings, and he treats of all kinds of subjects, including many of the things you listed there. But that's ALL he can say? I've rarely seen anyone post something more stupid than this, and it's evidence of that fact that the radical SVs have never given the man the slightest benefit of the doubt but have some deep-seated contempt for him simply because he had been in the Novus Ordo, and are looking for about anything they can find to slander him.
This is reinforced by the fact that you add disrespect to the slander by referring to him as "this guy". That's not how you address a bishop or a priest, buddy. I have serious disagreements with Bishop Pivarunas, and many others, but I'd never have the temerity to call him "this guy".
And of course much of the content depends on your audience. I've never seen a Traditional Catholic priest, in 35 years, speak out against contraception, for instance, or atheism, or most of the things you list. Why? Because it's a waste of time in the context of Traditional Catholics, where you're preaching to the choir.
You need to examine your conscience.
.
Okay, let me explain.
First of all, Vigano is not an archbishop. He was given this title by John Paul 2, who has no authority to make anyone anything. If Vigano were really as traditional as you think he is, he would reject this fake title, along with the heresiarch who gave it to him. But where has Vigano condemned John Paul 2 for any of the heresies he has ever said, or for Assisi, or kissing the Koran, or any of his other apostasies? I would like to see it if he has ever said this. I would also like to see if Vigano has ever said he does not consider himself an archbishop, since that requires 1) being a bishop for starters, and 2) being appointed such by a true pope.
Speaking of being a bishop, Vigano claims to have been consecrated a bishop by John Paul 2. He has stated publicly that he considers the Novus Ordo sacraments to be valid, and this was even after his excommunication, I believe. He has never retracted these views. If he were a real traditional bishop, he would renounce his modernist consecration and his fake title from a fake pope, and say he is just Father Vigano, since only his ordination (I guess?) is valid.
While I have read him condemning Bergoglio many times, I have never heard him denounce Paul VI or John Paul II as heretics. I hope I am wrong, but I would need to see where he has done this. If he accepts both those men as true popes, and doesn't even have anything bad to say against them, then I don't see how he can be considered a traditional Catholic. Both Paul VI and John Paul II spent their entire lives destroying the Catholic Faith, and this has been well docuмented, in a way that anyone with a computer can find out about, so everyone who wants to believe in the Catholic Faith knows this.
I listened to the sermon you linked to in support of his preaching of the gospel, and it actually confirmed what I was saying. A sermon is supposed to tell the hearer what he is supposed to do in order to be saved. Our Lord's sermons in the gospels all do this. "Do penance, lest ye all likewise perish." But this "sermon" of Vigano was typical of all the other sermons I've heard from him. It does not tell the listener to do anything. All it says is, "There are evil globalists out there destroying the world. These men are evil." That message does not get anyone to heaven. Yes, he spent a couple of sentences in those many long paragraphs (and it was not much more than that) talking about the holiness of the family and the virtue of purity, but it was in the context of "These same evil men I am talking about are trying to destroy the family and the virtue of purity." He said nothing about the listener avoiding sin.
Did Our Lord stand around all day talking about the evil morals of the pagan Romans? What good would that have done? No, He told His hearers how to obtain salvation. I didn't see anything to that effect in that sermon you linked to, so that kind of proves my point.
As far as your comment about my lack of respect by calling him "that guy", and how you don't call Bp. Pivarunas "that guy", the difference is that Bp. Pivarunas is a Catholic bishop, validly consecrated, who rejected Vatican 2 and its false popes and all the false teachings from the false church. He was consecrated a bishop by a similarly Catholic bishop who rejected Vatican 2, who consecrated him to carry on the work of the Church in opposing the modernist revolution, and therefore lawfully functions as a bishop for the good of souls.
But Vigano has either not been validly consecrated a bishop at all, or if he has, he has been so in contradiction to his publicly stated assertions that he accepts the modernist sacraments as valid, thus causing grave scandal by telling people that modernist sacraments are valid while he himself believes in practice that they are not. And he publicly claims to be an archbishop on the grounds that he was appointed to such a post by the heresiarch John Paul 2, who appointed him to that post in reward for his service to the modernist institution.
Now, I believe in repentance and forgiveness for everyone, but only for those who reject their errors. But Vigano has not rejected his fake title of archbishop from the fake pope who gave it to him, nor has he rejected the antichrist of our times Paul VI who destroyed the Catholic Church, nor has he rejected the fake doubtful sacraments from this demon in human form.
If I am wrong about any of these facts, I would like to be corrected, but I hope that explains my words about Vigano.
Topic: Abp. Vigano (Read 3914 times)