Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: (((nukes)))  (Read 540 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 12471
  • Reputation: +8260/-1580
  • Gender: Male
(((nukes)))
« on: May 04, 2025, 02:26:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Israel’s Nukes
    By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
    May 3, 2025


    David Martin wrote:
    I have been informed by a correspondent that the site that I used for the explanation of why the Trump administration continues to lie for Israel about its nuclear arsenal has a credibility problem of its own.  One can spot it by reading the article carefully.  The headline says, “Israel has 90 nukes – but our leaders won’t say so because U.S. would have to cut off aid.”   The “90 nukes” wording is also in the subtitle and in the third paragraph.  But in the second paragraph we see, “At least 90 of them.”
    Indeed.  It turns out that there is a Wikipedia page that examines tse question of Israel’s nuclear weapons, and there we see in the second sentence, with a host of references, “Estimates of Israel’s stockpile range between 90 and 400 nuclear warheads,[2][5][6][7][8][9][19
    Nuclear weapons and Israel – Wikipedia
    So, the 90 number is apparently a bare minimum estimate.  My correspondent, who has followed the matter quite closely, thinks the real number of nuclear weapons might be closer to 1000.  And we are not just hair splitting over numbers.  He is not alone in believing that the reason Israel has so many is that they want to have enough to make the Samson Option credible.  
    There’s a Wikipedia page on that subject, but I think people can get a better handle on it by going to the web page with the title, “Can Israel’s Doomsday Weapon Destroy Human Civilization?” 
    It concludes this way: 
    Take my opinion for what it’s worth. But I would like everyone to ask themselves if we should be allies, or even tolerate the existence of a state with a “Samson Option” of rage quitting and killing us all.

    Logged

    Online gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8084
    • Reputation: +2484/-1109
    • Gender: Male
    Re: (((nukes)))
    « Reply #1 on: May 05, 2025, 01:19:26 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Israhell is certainly a problem but NewX are (((Fake and Ghey)))
    Logged
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline SoldierofCtK

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 242
    • Reputation: +242/-27
    • Gender: Male
      • YouTube Channel
    Re: (((nukes)))
    « Reply #2 on: May 05, 2025, 01:45:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: gladius_veritatis on May 05, 2025, 01:19:26 PM
    Israhell is certainly a problem but NewX are (((Fake and Ghey)))
    This guy gets it.
    Logged
    +J.M.J.+

    Fides Ex Auditu - Faith Comes From Hearing
    YouTube - SoldierofCtK

    Offline WhiteWorkinClassScapegoat

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 986
    • Reputation: +621/-661
    • Gender: Male
    Re: (((nukes)))
    « Reply #3 on: May 06, 2025, 08:44:09 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • An Israeli dolphin-class submarine hit the Pentagon with a missile on 9/11. It wasn't a plane (which is why the surveillance footage capturing the "plane" [missile] hitting it hasn't been released). They can launch nukes, too.
    Logged
    Dan shall be a serpent in the way, a viper by the path, that bites the horse's heels so his rider falls backward. ~ Genesis 49:17

    My avatar is a painting titled Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ (1913) by Adolf Hitler

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12471
    • Reputation: +8260/-1580
    • Gender: Male
    Re: (((nukes)))
    « Reply #4 on: May 07, 2025, 01:01:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
    • Quote from: gladius_veritatis on May 05, 2025, 01:19:26 PM
    Israhell is certainly a problem but NewX are (((Fake and Ghey)))
    This absurd denial has already been debunked: https://www.cathinfo.com/anonymous-posts-allowed/would-god-allow-nuclear-war/msg940854/#msg940854
    Logged

    Online gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8084
    • Reputation: +2484/-1109
    • Gender: Male
    Re: (((nukes)))
    « Reply #5 on: May 07, 2025, 09:09:29 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Do I need to ask whether or not you still believe in Cooties-19, Germ Theory and all that fun stuff?

    Whatever disagreements aside, I wish you and yours peace of mind and heart, now and in the trying days to come.
    Logged
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12471
    • Reputation: +8260/-1580
    • Gender: Male
    Re: (((nukes)))
    « Reply #6 on: May 07, 2025, 09:32:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Whatever multiple crackpot opinions you hold against a mountain of evidence aside, I wish you and yours peace of mind and heart, now and in the trying days to come.
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »