CathInfo.com

Symbolically and elegantly, Rabbi Abraham ben Ezra notes that the contracted name of God, הי, iāh [or yāh] is contained in the word השא, ’iššāh [woman]. God is the founder of marriage, and as long as His name remains in marriage — and it remains as long as spouses fear God and mutually love each other — God will be present in and bless the marriage. But if they hate one another and forget God, then the spouses will cast away that name. Therefore, with the Hebrew letters yod [י] and he [ה] removed, of which the word הי is composed, all that remains of שיא, ’îš, and השא, ’iššāh, i.e. all that remains of the of the Hebrew words for “man” and “woman,” is שא שא, êš êš, i.e., “fire and fire,” the fire of quarrels and trouble in this life, but eternal fire in the next.

---

^{Symbolice et lepide, R. Abraham ben Ezra notat in voce אשה isscha, contineri nomen contractum Dei יה ia, qui est auctor conjugii; et quandiu hoc nomen in conjugio manet (manet autem quandiu conjuges Deum timent, et mutuo sese amant), tandiu nuptiis Deum adesse et benedicere. Si vero invicem oderint, et Dei obliviscantur, tum illud nomen conjuges abjicere; itaque sublato jod et he, ex quibus fit אשה, tantum remanere ex איה isch, et אשה isscha, id est ex viro et muliere, אש אש esch esch, id est ignem et ignem, scilicet ignem rixarum et molestiae in hac vita, in altera vero ignem æternum.}

Why is Cornelius a Lapide quoting a Judaising heresiarch and the blasphemous anti-Christian masoretic text with its fake masoretic "hebrew" as an authority whilst also calling it elegant? Was this common amongst early Jesuits?

My question, not point, is self evident and unanswered. Why would catholics rely on heretics especially the perfidious Jєωs as authorities?

I have my doubts as to whether the modern editions of these texts are in fact real and not corrupted with forgeries. For example i believe St Thomas never denied the immaculate conception but someone added it into the summa later, simply because he affirmed it factually at the time so why would he contradict himself? And why would popes make a manual that denies dogma required text for seminary with nihil obstat and imprimatur? The simplest explanation me is that these texts have been corrupted by the Jєωιѕн world order, freemasons and infiltrators amongst the clergy and novus ordo sect to add in pro Jєωιѕн sentiment and confusing heresies. Not that it is always the case, im sure some priests were duped by the seductive deceptions of the Jєωs too.

Anyone can claim to read and quote these texts but who is actually reading and quoting genuine pre illuminati era preserved hard copies? We quote some website that claims to have the text as a source and take for granted that it has perfect provenance, when they could have injected some corruption in or copied a corrupt text.