Struthio is confusing the term "consummation of the world" with the term "end times". The "end times" or the "latter days" (note the plural in both those expressions, which does indicate an ongoing period) is not the same thing as the "consummation of the world", for the simple reason that 1. we don't know if we are in the end times, and 2. that the world is not yet consummated. The consummation of something is the end of it.
Struthio could have verified all of these things with a simple dictionary. He seems like a smart guy, so it's hard to see how he has trouble with such simple words.
His reference to the prophecy of Our Lord is problematic because Our Lord is predicting both the end of the world and the destruction of Jerusalem in the same passage, and it is hard to see which statements refer to which events, and which refer to both events.
For example, he quotes the "abomination of desolation" as being a sign of the end of the world. But this has also been applied to the destruction of Jerusalem. I think it was in Gueranger that I read that the abomination of desolation that warned the Jews to flee Jerusalem was the putting up of a statue of a pagan god in the temple of Jerusalem. As soon as the Romans did that, the converted Jews fled Jerusalem.
At the very least, such obscure passages can hardly be adduced to prove anything as clear and definite as he is trying to argue.
Basically, the consummation of the world means the end of the world. Just look the word up in a dictionary. We are not in the end of the world.