Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Una cuм Question: An AI Bug, or Catholic Teaching?  (Read 341244 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Freind

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 388
  • Reputation: +47/-48
  • Gender: Male
  • Caritas, Veritas, Sinceritas
Re: Una cuм Question: An AI Bug, or Catholic Teaching?
« Reply #225 on: Today at 10:09:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And I do agree with +ABL re: Rome is in apostacy etc., I also agree with him saying non-una cuм was ridiculous. 

    And in 1986 when +ABL admitted?:

    "I am on the way to saying the Pope is not Pope"

     "it is possible we may be obliged to believe [John Paul II] is not pope."


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 15269
    • Reputation: +6250/-924
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Una cuм Question: An AI Bug, or Catholic Teaching?
    « Reply #226 on: Today at 12:43:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And in 1986 when +ABL admitted?:

    "I am on the way to saying the Pope is not Pope"

     "it is possible we may be obliged to believe [John Paul II] is not pope."
    What about it? He died 5 years later and still said that the pope was the pope. I think after dealing face to face with both PPVI and also JP2 in 1980 (I think) and 1988, that if anything, he would have had no doubt whatsoever. So quote the good archbishop all you want, he had plenty of time to actually accept it before he died, but he never did. That fact is indisputable.  

      

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse