Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Trinity Sunday  (Read 206 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lover of Truth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8480
  • Reputation: +1089/-822
  • Gender: Male
Trinity Sunday
« on: May 20, 2016, 01:10:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13May/trinisun.htm#haydock

     "Behold I am with you all days"


    TRINITY SUNDAY

        In the short, but powerfully poignant and pertinent paragraphs from our Lord's mouth in His final assurance of His protection in today's Gospel we have all we need to debunk all Protestant argumentation for Scriptura sola or Fidei sola. Their rationalizations are heresy for the Word alone will not save you, nor will Faith alone, but rather those combined through the Sacraments for only through being in the state of Sanctifying Grace can we hope to achieve Heaven. We arrive at the sacraments through Faith and we learn Faith through the Word. Consider, if you will, a three-legged stool (ideal analogy for Trinity Sunday). If one of those legs are missing the stool cannot stand. To know Jesus is to love Him and obey Him by following all He commands.

    Comprehensive Catholic Commentary
    by
    Fr. George Leo Haydock
    provided by
    John Gregory

            Today, when political correctness and universal salvation rule the roost the three final verses of Matthew's Gospel are a crash course in polemics that His grace is only shed on and available through the Church He founded, not through or by an offshoot fashioned by man. Thus, whether the man would be a Nestor, an Arius, a Mohammed, a Photius, a Michael Caerularius, a John Hus, a Martin Luther, a John Calvin, a Henry VIII, a John Smith, a Joe Doe, or a Vatican II false pope, the Catholic Church cannot be improved upon and any attempt is a slap in God's face and should be shunted as not Catholic. It simply cannot be considered Catholic or of God for one or all of the four necessary indelible Marks of the Church would be missing. No matter how large (whether it's billions like Islam or the conciliar church) or just a few, if a sect (religious group) is not in full accord with the infallible decrees of the dogmatic Council of Trent which reaffirmed and set in stone all Christ and His Apostles passed down, said sect must be avoided at all costs, especially the cost of one's soul!

    Epistle: Romans 11: 33-36

    33 O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and of the knowledge of God! How incomprehensible are His judgments, and how unsearchable His ways! 34 For who hath known the mind of the Lord? Or who hath been His counsellor?

    35 Or who hath first given to Him, and recompense shall be made Him? 36 For of Him, and by Him, and in Him, are all things: to Him be glory for ever. Amen.

        Commentary on Verse 36 O the depth, & c. After he hath spoken of the mysteries of God’s grace and predestination, of His mercy and justice, which we must not pretend to dive into, he concludes this part of his epistle, by an exclamation, to teach us submission of our judgment, as to the secrets of His providence, which we cannot comprehend. – How incomprehensible are his judgments, & c. – Who hath first given to Him, and recompense shall be made Him? That is, no one, by any merit on his part, can first deserve God’s favors and mercy, by which He prevents us. – For of Him, from God, or from Jesus Christ, as God, and by Him, Who made, preserves, and governs all things, and in Him, is our continual dependence: for in Him we live, we move, and exist. In the Greek, it is unto Him, to signify He is also our last end. See the notes, John c. i. Wi. – All things are from God, as their first cause and creator; all things are by God, as the ruler and governor of the universe; and all things are in God, or (as the Greek has it) for God, because they are all directed to His honor and glory. For He hath made all things for Himself. Ps. xvi. St. Basil, lib. De Spirtu sto. C. 5.


    Gospel: St. Matthew 28: 18-20

    18 And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to Me in Heaven and in earth.

        Commentary on Verse 18 All power is given to Me. The Arians object that the power which Christ had, is said to be given Him by another. The Catholics answer, that Christ, as man, received this power from God. Secondly, it may also be said, that the eternal Son, though He be equal, and be the same God with the Father, yet He proceeds and receives all from the Father. Wi. – See here the warrant and commission of the apostles and their successors, the bishops and pastors of Christ’s Church. He received from His Father, all power in Heaven and in earth: and in virtue of this power He sends them (even as His Father sent Him, St. John xx 21.) to teach and disciple, not one, but all nations, and instruct them in all truths: and that He may assist them effectually in the execution of this commission, He promises to be with them, (not for three or four hundred years only) but all days, even to the consummation of the world. How then could the Catholic Church go astray? Having always with her pastors, as is here promised, Christ Himself, Who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life. St. John xiv. 6. Ch. – Some hence infer that Jesus Christ, according to His human nature, was sovereign Lord of the whole world; but more properly this may be taken of His spiritual power, such as regards the salvation of souls. For Jesus Christ says to Pilate, My kingdom is not of this world. This spiritual power, Jesus Christ communicated in part to His apostles and their successors in the ministry, as to His vicars: As My Father hath sent Me, so I send you. Whatsoever you shall loose upon earth, shall be loosed also in Heaven: behold here the power both in Heaven and earth. E.

    19 Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.

        Commentary on Verse 19 Teach all nations. In St. Mark we read, going into the whole world, preach to every creature, that is capable of it; not only to the Jews, but to all nations throughout the whole world, baptizing them,& c. The Anabaptists pretend to shew from this place, that none are to be baptized, unless they be first taught and instructed. This is true, as to persons who are already come to an age, in which they are capable of being instructed before their baptism. But according to the tradition and constant doctrine of the Catholic Church, received also by the pretended Reformed Churches, new born children are to be baptized before they are capable of instruction: nor can they enter into the kingdom of Heaven without baptism. – In the name of the Father, & c. We are made Christians in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: we profess to believe, and hope for our salvation, by believing, hoping, serving, and adoring the same three divine Persons, from whence the Fathers prove the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost to be one God, and equal in all perfections. Wi. – Had Christ only said, Lo! I am with you all days; it might, in that case, be limited to the natural lives of the apostles; but as he moreover adds, even to the consummation of the world, it must necessarily be extended to their successors in the ministry, till the end of time. E. – By the words Go, teach, he gives them the power of teaching not only what relates to faith, but also what is necessarily connected with piety and holy conversation. For we see added a further explanation, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: which words, beyond all doubt, must be referred to the precepts of a holy life. How egregiously then must those men be deceived, who infer from the words teach all nations, that faith alone will suffice. What follows, baptizing them, shews another part of the pastoral functions, which consists in the administration of the sacraments. Hence also all heretics are refuted, who pretend to affirm that all ecclesiastical ministry consists in barely delivering the word. Estius in dif. loca.

    20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.

        Commentary on Verse 20 Behold I am with you all days, even to the end of the world, embraces two points necessary for the Church; viz. integrity of doctrine, and sanctity of life; for, if either of these should be wanting to the Church, it might then be justly said, that she had been left and abandoned by Christ, her Spouse. E. – Jesus Christ will make good His promise: 1. by always dwelling in the hearts of the faithful; 2. by His sacramental presence in the holy Eucharist; 3. by His providential care, and constant protection to His holy Catholic Church. These last six lines of St. Matthew’s gospel, says the bright luminary of France, Bossuet, most clearly demonstrate the infallibility and indefectibility of the one, holy, Catholic Church, which all are commanded to her and to obey.

    http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2019.htm#article8

    Article 8. Whether the degree of goodness or malice in the will depends on the degree of good or evil in the intention?


    Objection 1. It would seem that the degree of goodness in the will depends on the degree of good in the intention. Because on Matthew 12:35, "A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good," a gloss says: "A man does as much good as he intends." But the intention gives goodness not only to the external action, but also to the act of the will, as stated above (Article 7). Therefore the goodness of a man's will is according to the goodness of his intention.

    Objection 2.
    Further, if you add to the cause, you add to the effect. But the goodness of the intention is the cause of the good will. Therefore a man's will is good, according as his intention is good.

    Objection 3. Further, in evil actions, a man sins in proportion to his intention: for if a man were to throw a stone with a murderous intention, he would be guilty of murder. Therefore, for the same reason, in good actions, the will is good in proportion to the good intended.

    On the contrary, The intention can be good, while the will is evil. Therefore, for the same reason, the intention can be better, and the will less good.

    I answer that, In regard to both the act, and the intention of the end, we may consider a twofold quantity: one, on the part of the object, by reason of a man willing or doing a good that is greater; the other, taken from the intensity of the act, according as a man wills or acts intensely; and this is more on the part of the agent.

    If then we speak of these respective quantities from the point of view of the object, it is evident that the quantity in the act does not depend on the quantity in the intention. With regard to the external act this may happen in two ways. First, through the object that is ordained to the intended end not being proportionate to that end; for instance, if a man were to give ten pounds, he could not realize his intention, if he intended to buy a thing worth a hundred pounds. Secondly, on account of the obstacles that may supervene in regard to the exterior action, which obstacles we are unable to remove: for instance, a man intends to go to Rome, and encounters obstacles, which prevent him from going. On the other hand, with regard to the interior act of the will, this happens in only one way: because the interior acts of the will are in our power, whereas the external actions are not. But the will can will an object that is not proportionate to the intended end: and thus the will that tends to that object considered absolutely, is not so good as the intention. Yet because the intention also belongs, in a way, to the act of the will, inasmuch, to wit, as it is the reason thereof; it comes to pass that the quantity of goodness in the intention redounds upon the act of the will; that is to say, in so far as the will wills some great good for an end, although that by which it wills to gain so great a good, is not proportionate to that good.

    But if we consider the quantity in the intention and in the act, according to their respective intensity, then the intensity of the intention redounds upon the interior act and the exterior act of the will: since the intention stands in relation to them as a kind of form, as is clear from what has been said above (12, 4; 18, 6). And yet considered materially, while the intention is intense, the interior or exterior act may be not so intense, materially speaking: for instance, when a man does not will with as much intensity to take medicine as he wills to regain health. Nevertheless the very fact of intending health intensely, redounds, as a formal principle, upon the intense volition of medicine.

    We must observe, however, that the intensity of the interior or exterior act, may be referred to the intention as its object: as when a man intends to will intensely, or to do something intensely. And yet it does not follow that he wills or acts intensely; because the quantity of goodness in the interior or exterior act does not depend on the quantity of the good intended, as is shown above. And hence it is that a man does not merit as much as he intends to merit: because the quantity of merit is measured by the intensity of the act, as we shall show later on (20, 04; 114, 4).

    Reply to Objection 1.
     This gloss speaks of good as in the estimation of God, Who considers principally the intention of the end. Wherefore another gloss says on the same passage that "the treasure of the heart is the intention, according to which God judges our works." For the goodness of the intention, as stated above, redounds, so to speak, upon the goodness of the will, which makes even the external act to be meritorious in God's sight.

    Reply to Objection 2. The goodness of the intention is not the whole cause of a good will. Hence the argument does not prove.

    Reply to Objection 3. The mere malice of the intention suffices to make the will evil: and therefore too, the will is as evil as the intention is evil. But the same reasoning does not apply to goodness, as stated above (ad 2).
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Binechi

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2319
    • Reputation: +503/-38
    • Gender: Male
    Trinity Sunday
    « Reply #1 on: May 22, 2016, 11:30:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  •  

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16