What’s wrong with that? If the arguments do not stand up, then they’re not very useful for fighting modernism
I’m calling out the disingenuous intent.
As for arguments not standing up, the truth can be argued poorly, and sophisms can be argued effectively.
In my case, the truth was argued effectively (ie., see Pax Vobis’s post to me just above, in case you couldn’t draw the implication from my post).