Author Topic: Telling (Read 5620 times)

OSanctissimus · « **Reply #85 on:** **Yesterday** at 06:49:45 PM »

Quote from: Mark 79 on September 25, 2026, 09:34:03 AM

^^^^ bumped to highlight the provocateur.

I assume you mean yourself?

Mark 79 · « **Reply #86 on:** **Yesterday** at 08:55:08 PM »

Quote from: OSanctissimus on Yesterday at 06:49:45 PM

I assume you mean yourself?

In order to distract readers from your serial lying, you conflate things that are significantly different.

Observed behavior or bodily sensation is a symptom, not a diagnosis.

When one observes a behavior or experiences a body sensation it is a fact.

The constellation of history, chief complaint, symptoms plus an exam plus any relevant lab or imaging is then considered.

With the requisite knowledge, training, and experience the observations are then ordered into a "differential diagnosis", a ranked set of possibilities.

Only after the stepped process does a rational person select the most likely explanation as a "diagnosis."

"Consider" the definition that you provided: "…process…through evaluation of patient history, examination, and review of laboratory data.…derived from such an evaluation"

The individual elements of the process are not the diagnosis.

The symptom is not a diagnosis.

The history is not a diagnosis.

The consideration is not a diagnosis.

The process is not a diagnosis.

It is the full process that leads to a diagnosis.

I mentioned only elements observed to be "considered," a cyclicity, and never claimed to perform the complete process and so I never reached or offered a diagnosis. You are the one "way out of your lane."

You are indeed an ignoranus and a liar and a hypocrite.

You seem to hint that diagnosis may be in your "lane." If so, you are an incompetent diagnostician.

Quote from: OSanctissimus on Yesterday at 06:45:49 PM

Well, I see that the agent of chaos is here.

Oh, the irony!

Your responses to the drubbing you are receiving in this thread and in the "Telling" thread, https://www.cathinfo.com/the-sacred-catholic-liturgy-chant-prayers/telling/msg1040730/#msg1040730
include Gish Gallops. You too have "said a lot of things" at a rapid pace, many of which are false.

"Considering" that you claim to be a woman and have demonstrated a soft spot for an "evangelist" of the Judaized Novus Ordo (Nishant/Xavier/Telling), I wonder if you also claim тαℓмυdic heritage. Are you a convert from тαℓмυdic Judaism? I ask because a pattern, though not yet firm seems to be starting to coalesce. After all, the tribe is infamous for accusing others of things for which they themselves are much more demonstrably guilty (in your case, Gish Gallops, lies, incompetence, and hypocrisy). Do I smell the tainted odor of gefilte fish? In view of your penchant for "quadrupling down" on the serial lies you have told in the Telling thread. I allow for the possibility (likelihood?) that you will lie in your response here, but I ask anyway.

Further "consideration," while a disproportion of thumbs-down is not an objective measure of truth per se, your own disproportion of down-thumbs as a newbie is indeed an indicator that you lack credibility in and seem incompatible with the "Trads" this forum.

Quote from: OSanctissimus on Yesterday at 06:48:06 PM

Oh there is a provocateur here alright....

The original Catholic Bible is the Latin Vulgate, so it is all the more suspicious when any newbie starts arguing it's modernism from the "Hebrew", in this case the increasingly suspect newbie "O Sanctissimus":

https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/latest-kolbe-center-re-fr-robinson's-the-realist-guide-to-religion-and-science/msg1040633/#msg1040633

There has been no Magisterium that allowed "diēs" and "diem" anywhere, a fortiori in Genesis 1:5. as anything other than a 24-hour day or daytime."

The Judaizing bullshit line that (((O Sanctissimus))) offered about "יום" (transliterated as yom or yôm) originated with the PBC 1909. Consideration of Genesis 1:5, whether in Latin, Greek, or Hebrew, as meaning anything other than a 24-hour day has absolutely no Apostolic lineage. Understanding of Genesis 1:5 as an epoch or anything other than a 24-hour day is de novo modernist heresy, subversive Judaizing bullshit.

Similarly, the Septuagint's ἡμέρα (transliterated as hēmera) in Genesis 1:5 has no Apostolic lineage.

The consideration and process is getting very close to a "diagnosis." :laugh2: title=laugh2

The Newbie (((O Sanctissimus))) reeks of the stench of gefilte fish. Keep an eye on that יענטע (transliterated yenta, Yiddish meaning "an annoying talkative Jew bitch").

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Telling (Read 5620 times)

OSanctissimus

Re: Telling

Mark 79

Re: Telling