diagnosis /dī″əg-nō′sĭs/
noun
- The act or process of identifying or determining the nature and cause of a disease or injury through evaluation of patient history, examination, and review of laboratory data.
- The opinion derived from such an evaluation.
- A critical analysis of the nature of something.
Have you always had a problem with attempting to diagnose others, but not yourself?
You continue yourself to behave abnormally here: diagnosing others, yet claiming you are not diagnosing, calling people liars when no lies were told.
Itemizing, identifying, listing in fine detail, categorizing, qualifying, sorting, arranging, grouping, ranking, distinguishing, the behavior of others in an amazing amount of obsessive-compulsive detail [hypocrite!], attempting to promote yourself as a "diagnoser of problems" then castigating and attempting to get others banned from the site FOR NO GOOD REASON.
It is you who is behaving like both a lunatic and a hypocrite here.
It is you who is spreading falsehoods about others, exaggerating their perceived "faults".
And it is you who will not examine his own behavior in light all of the above.
You are waaay out of line, out of your lane, and out of your purview.
Good day sir.
In order to distract readers from your serial lying, you conflate things that are significantly different.Observed behavior or bodily sensation is a symptom,
not a diagnosis.
When one observes a behavior or experiences a body sensation it is a fact.
The constellation of history, chief complaint, symptoms plus an exam plus any relevant lab or imaging is then
considered.
With the requisite knowledge, training, and experience the observations are then ordered into a "differential diagnosis", a ranked set of
possibilities.
Only after the stepped process does a rational person select the most likely explanation as a "diagnosis."
"Consider" the definition that
you provided: "…
process…through evaluation of patient history, examination, and review of laboratory data.…derived from such an evaluation"
The individual elements of the process are not the diagnosis.The symptom is not a diagnosis.
The history is not a diagnosis.
The consideration is not a diagnosis.
It is the full process that leads to a diagnosis. I mentioned only elements observed to be "considered," a cyclicity, and never claimed to perform the complete process and so I never reached or offered a diagnosis. You are the one "way out of your lane."
You are indeed an ignoranus and a liar and a hypocrite.
You seem to hint that diagnosis may be in your "lane." If so, you are an incompetent diagnostician.
Topic: Telling (Read 3776 times)