Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Telling  (Read 3359 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Telling
« Reply #75 on: September 20, 2026, 08:49:22 PM »

…versus categorizing, itemizing, psychologizing, and pathologizing a person in great detail (as was done for the other guy), with itemized lists, giving him an actual supposed "diagnosis"  ARE NOT THE SAME.“

You are lying again.

You have not quoted my "diagnosis" because I only mentioned "considerations" as specifically regards Nishant/Xavier/Telling.



Their obsessive compulsion to keep returning shows a cyclicity that adds confidence to (1) on medication/off medication and (2) bipolar disorder considerations.


I reminded you of that already, even imbedding a link to "considerations":




(1) Having explicitly stated that the cyclicity is among the "considerations" I stopped well short of making a formal diagnosis of Nishant.

(2) "Colloquial" crazy, albeit broad, is indeed a diagnosis of "psychopatholgy, unspecified. ICD-10 code F99"

(3) Nowhere in this thread did I ask that Nishant be banned for any reason. A fortiori, I did not ask that Nishant be banned "
based off of this '"diagnosis'". Therefore, they are crazies and you are a liar.

(4) Crazy and lying "ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS."

(5) I just checked. There is no ICD-10 code for being a liar, hence I have not diagnosed you.

:laugh2:


https://www.cathinfo.com/the-sacred-catholic-liturgy-chant-prayers/telling/msg1040644/?topicseen#msg1040644

And yet you have doubled quadrupled-down on your lie, because "categorizing, itemizing, psychologizing, and pathologizing a person in great detail " is quadrupling-down on your lie — I did none of those things.

I simply—and accurately—described the behavior of Nishant/Xavier/Telling obsessively and compulsively returning where banned and unwelcome. That behavior indeed is worth considering.

Your now-serialized lies are also worth considering.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Telling
« Reply #76 on: September 20, 2026, 09:05:12 PM »
I mean, isn't the guy allowed to his view on the issue?

My understanding -- and correct me if I am wrong -- is that the forum is for trads in general.  Not just sspx.

There are trads who believe V2 contains heresy outright.    There are trads who believe V2 is merely ambiguous and can be *interpreted* heretically, but is not in itself outright heresy.

This forum is supposed to allow space for both.

So, no, this forum is typically for Trads (capital T) not trads (smells and bells types) ... though there are a few posters here who are not.  Now, the difference with those other posters is that the latter are not coming in here to convert Traditional Catholics, or to troll.  Bottom line is that nobody wants to come on this forum here and see every other thread and every other post made by a guy who isn't here in good faith, seeking the truth, or at least an understanding of what Traditional Catholics think, but to denounce Trads as schismatic and to "evangelized", aka "convert" us non-Catholics.  If some sedevacantists came on here and did nothing but attack the members on this forum, or an R&R came on here to attack sedevacantists, and that was their main (if not only) reason for being here, that too would be disruputive of the forum and would suggest banning.

Prior to Nishant here, the previous poster to be banned was actually a Resistance type (and the forum moderator is Resistance) ... but he had an obsessive one-track mind where the only thing he did was to attack Archbishop Thuc or the clergy who derive their Holy Orders ultimately from him and sedevacantists ... and (neo-)SSPX.  Nobody wanted to be subjected to that here, day in and day out.  Even if you could log in an find fewer than half the active threads having been started by that poster, all of them attacking anyone who wasn't Resistance, you could open up any thread and find every other post made by that guy, and which one invovled an attack on the same parties.

Furthermore ... Nishant has been banned multiple times already and is in violation of forum rules to keep sneaking back onto the forum with alternative accounts.

Finally, who the heck do you think you are to declare what "this forum is supposed to allow"?  Are you the moderator?  Nobody here want to constantly read some jackass attempt to defend the New Mass and Vatican II and the Modernist Anti-Popes and the heretics / sodomites who comprise 95%+ of the Conciliar episcopate.  People don't come here for that.  If we wanted to deal with some Modernist condemning Traditional Catholics, we could go on any number of Conciliar forums.


Re: Telling
« Reply #77 on: September 20, 2026, 10:57:21 PM »
You are lying again.

You have not quoted my "diagnosis" because I only mentioned "considerations" as specifically regards Nishant/Xavier/Telling.



I reminded you of that already, even imbedding a link to "considerations":

https://www.cathinfo.com/the-sacred-catholic-liturgy-chant-prayers/telling/msg1040644/?topicseen#msg1040644

And yet you have doubled quadrupled-down on your lie, because "categorizing, itemizing, psychologizing, and pathologizing a person in great detail " is quadrupling-down on your lie — I did none of those things.

I simply—and accurately—described the behavior of Nishant/Xavier/Telling obsessively and compulsively returning where banned and unwelcome. That behavior indeed is worth considering.

Your now-serialized lies are also worth considering.

Good gracious you are a walking, talking, pot-stirring mess. 

Get a mirror and take one good look in it.   What you are describing of others is exactly what you are doing. 

Re: Telling
« Reply #78 on: September 20, 2026, 11:02:42 PM »
So, no, this forum is typically for Trads (capital T) not trads (smells and bells types) ... though there are a few posters here who are not.  Now, the difference with those other posters is that the latter are not coming in here to convert Traditional Catholics, or to troll.  Bottom line is that nobody wants to come on this forum here and see every other thread and every other post made by a guy who isn't here in good faith, seeking the truth, or at least an understanding of what Traditional Catholics think, but to denounce Trads as schismatic and to "evangelized", aka "convert" us non-Catholics.  If some sedevacantists came on here and did nothing but attack the members on this forum, or an R&R came on here to attack sedevacantists, and that was their main (if not only) reason for being here, that too would be disruputive of the forum and would suggest banning.

Prior to Nishant here, the previous poster to be banned was actually a Resistance type (and the forum moderator is Resistance) ... but he had an obsessive one-track mind where the only thing he did was to attack Archbishop Thuc or the clergy who derive their Holy Orders ultimately from him and sedevacantists ... and (neo-)SSPX.  Nobody wanted to be subjected to that here, day in and day out.  Even if you could log in an find fewer than half the active threads having been started by that poster, all of them attacking anyone who wasn't Resistance, you could open up any thread and find every other post made by that guy, and which one invovled an attack on the same parties.

Furthermore ... Nishant has been banned multiple times already and is in violation of forum rules to keep sneaking back onto the forum with alternative accounts.

Finally, who the heck do you think you are to declare what "this forum is supposed to allow"?  Are you the moderator?  Nobody here want to constantly read some jackass attempt to defend the New Mass and Vatican II and the Modernist Anti-Popes and the heretics / sodomites who comprise 95%+ of the Conciliar episcopate.  People don't come here for that.  If we wanted to deal with some Modernist condemning Traditional Catholics, we could go on any number of Conciliar forums.
Like I said, this forum has become basically a clearinghouse for loonies.

Literally the blurb in the subtitle of the forum says, "A message board for sspx, resistance, and other traditional Catholics...." 

Which means that there might - theoretically -- be more than one type of trad here. 

I know that might sound shocking to you. 


That's not me "moderating" the forum.   That's me quoting the subtitle of the forum, located at the top righthand corner of your teensy weensy page.


St. Dymphna, ora pro nobis. 

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Telling
« Reply #79 on: Yesterday at 11:54:20 PM »
Good gracious you are a walking, talking, pot-stirring mess.

Get a mirror and take one good look in it.  What you are describing of others is exactly what you are doing.

I made no diagnosis, yet you repeatedly claimed that I made a "diagnosis."

Having repeatedly linked my actual posts, none of which make a diagnosis, you continue to lie.