Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Telling  (Read 635 times)

1 Member and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Telling
« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 08:58:56 PM »

*Re: Capitalization*

This is not an "Indian" or "Xavier" thing. It's actually standard Historical English.

What you call "random capital letters" is docuмented as *Substantive Capitalization* and *Rhetorical Capitalization* - very common in English until the 19th century.

1. *History:* With the development of the printing press and influence of German typography after the English Restoration in 1660, English printing began to favor increased capitalization of Nouns. Wikipedia notes: _"The first lines of the U.S. Constitution of 1787 show major capitalization of most nouns"_ — _We the People... in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility..._

2. *Grammar books taught it:* Grammars defined it as the Substantive or German-style case — _"The first word and all nouns capitalised; common in 18th-century English prose"_ — and Rhetorical case — _"Selective capitalisation of words for poetic or specific emphasis"_.

3. *When it faded:* A corpus study shows a steady rise until 1750 with a steep decline thereafter. By the end of the 18th century, with prescriptive dictionaries, the practice faded in Britain, but lasted as late as the cινιℓ ωαr era in the US. 

If you read the US Declaration, Shakespeare's Folio, or even Emily Dickinson, you will see the same pattern.

Re: Telling
« Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 09:03:48 PM »
*Re: Capitalization*

This is not an "Indian" or "Xavier" thing. It's actually standard Historical English.

What you call "random capital letters" is docuмented as *Substantive Capitalization* and *Rhetorical Capitalization* - very common in English until the 19th century.

1. *History:* With the development of the printing press and influence of German typography after the English Restoration in 1660, English printing began to favor increased capitalization of Nouns. Wikipedia notes: _"The first lines of the U.S. Constitution of 1787 show major capitalization of most nouns"_ — _We the People... in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility..._

2. *Grammar books taught it:* Grammars defined it as the Substantive or German-style case — _"The first word and all nouns capitalised; common in 18th-century English prose"_ — and Rhetorical case — _"Selective capitalisation of words for poetic or specific emphasis"_.

3. *When it faded:* A corpus study shows a steady rise until 1750 with a steep decline thereafter. By the end of the 18th century, with prescriptive dictionaries, the practice faded in Britain, but lasted as late as the cινιℓ ωαr era in the US.

If you read the US Declaration, Shakespeare's Folio, or even Emily Dickinson, you will see the same pattern.
If that we wenden ayein unto olde Englisshe, lat us wryte thus.


Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Telling (ban or sandbox the crazies)
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 10:02:43 PM »
Telling is giving off strong signals of having psychiatric problems
I agree 100%. I used the term "crazies" advisedly.


In looking over your Youtube page, your site description says that...."This channel aims at creating Value in people's lives by giving a Spiritual
Education that helps souls gain Heaven/Moksha."

I looked up the term...."Moksha," and it is evidently a foundation Hindu term that means freedom from the cycle of endless birth, death, and rebirth."

Are you aware, Xavier, that the Catholic Church does not believe in or teach reincarnation? We only have one life....not many.
Kudos for your sleuthing. …and a thumbs-up from me. Meg.

Having brought this Novus Ordo/Hindu pagan syncretism to light, this should make Matthew's job quite easy.

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: Telling
« Reply #23 on: Yesterday at 10:05:46 PM »
Except I'm the one reaching 100-200 MN Souls with a Team of 100 Twitter Evangelists, and thus, with a Reasonable Conversion Rate of 10-25%, we've already saved 10 MN to 50 MN Souls AT THE VERY LEAST, while you are wasting your life being a Schismatic Sedevacantist and a Dimond Disciple. Why not preach the Gospel and Baptism to Non-Christians. Why not do Apologetic Works for Protestants? You attacked me when I said I was going to write these Apologetic Books, then congratulated me by DM as Vlad Sarto on Twitter when I wrote them anyway. Lol. Like Archbishop Lefebvre, I don't back down, and do what the Spirit of God leads me to do. Likewise, +ABL said, the Catholic Authorities congratulated him in 1987 for doing so well even in resisting the unjust sanctions of 1976 etc.
Absolutely delusional, based on the rubbish you promote I would say you have helped save no one, and infact only increasing their sins. The Dimonds on the other hand actually make high quality videos about over coming sin, so not only doctrine but also morals.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Telling
« Reply #24 on: Yesterday at 11:30:06 PM »
The Online World is very much linked up now to the Real World. It has a Huge Impact on the Real World.

Here's my linkedin post that shows how fast the world is changing, for those able to race and keep up with it.

You teach "Logic"?  Seriously?  Might help to actually take a class in it first.