Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic:  (Read 2029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JoanScholastica

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 756
  • Reputation: +31/-0
  • Gender: Female
(No subject)
« on: November 05, 2007, 04:57:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Offline Nomas

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 59
    • Reputation: +16/-0
    • Gender: Male
    (No subject)
    « Reply #1 on: November 05, 2007, 05:52:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There is no way to know for certain, those names for the other four archangels come from apocryphal Jєωsish books and as such cannot be authenticated as true.


    Offline JoanScholastica

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 756
    • Reputation: +31/-0
    • Gender: Female
    (No subject)
    « Reply #2 on: November 07, 2007, 12:49:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for that... I'll still figure it out.

    Offline Nomas

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 59
    • Reputation: +16/-0
    • Gender: Male
    (No subject)
    « Reply #3 on: November 07, 2007, 06:50:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How do you plan to do that exactly?

    Offline JoanScholastica

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 756
    • Reputation: +31/-0
    • Gender: Female
    (No subject)
    « Reply #4 on: November 10, 2007, 10:07:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually, I could go here or there to get better and reliable answers about it. However, my resources are limited.


    Offline Nomas

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 59
    • Reputation: +16/-0
    • Gender: Male
    (No subject)
    « Reply #5 on: November 11, 2007, 07:40:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How do you plan on getting a better answer than the truth :surprised:

    I know you have already named your dogs after them so perhaps my answer isn't the one you wanted to hear, but it is the correct answer, we cannot know those other names for the archangels with any degree of certainty, that isn't to say they are definitely wrong but nor are they definitely right.

    Offline gilbertgea

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 301
    • Reputation: +22/-0
    • Gender: Male
    (No subject)
    « Reply #6 on: November 11, 2007, 12:09:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I recall hearing somewhere (I dont remember the source) that one of the Popes suppressed public prayer to non-Canonical angels with names like "Uriel" in order to stop cults from growing and spreading.  I wonder if that is true...

    Offline Nomas

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 59
    • Reputation: +16/-0
    • Gender: Male
    (No subject)
    « Reply #7 on: November 11, 2007, 02:59:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I remember reading the same thing.


    Offline Nomas

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 59
    • Reputation: +16/-0
    • Gender: Male
    (No subject)
    « Reply #8 on: November 11, 2007, 03:04:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • At the Council of Rome of 745, Pope St. Zachary, intending to clarify the Church's teaching on the subject of angels and curb a tendency toward angel worship, condemned obsession with angelic intervention and angelolatry, but reaffirmed the approval of the practice of the reverence of angels. This synod struck many angels' names from the list of those eligible for veneration in the Church of Rome, including Uriel. Only the reverence of the archangels mentioned in the recognized Catholic canon of scriptures, Michael, Gabriel and Raphael, remained licit.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uriel

    Offline JoanScholastica

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 756
    • Reputation: +31/-0
    • Gender: Female
    (No subject)
    « Reply #9 on: November 12, 2007, 05:30:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  •