Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5

Author Topic: Spiritual pleasures ⋙ carnal pleasures.  (Read 3022 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Spiritual pleasures ⋙ carnal pleasures.
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2019, 04:51:47 PM »
Now I understand why some hate the 1962 Missale. It's the same emotional "cooties" kind of thinking. Throw the baby out with the bathwater! The baby pooped in the tub; better throw out the water, the bathtub, and the baby himself!

Not TOO emotional, are you?

Who needs reason and logic when you can have spiritual cooties, feelings, and guilt by association?
Logged

Offline Motorede

Re: Spiritual pleasures ⋙ carnal pleasures.
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2019, 04:55:12 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on May 16, 2019, 04:39:18 PM
When God works the miracle of changing yeast, sugar and grains into gourmet alcohol, this is a holy transformation.  ;)
i concede. Norm knew! Cheers.
Logged

Offline Last Tradhican

Re: Spiritual pleasures ⋙ carnal pleasures.
« Reply #12 on: May 16, 2019, 04:59:46 PM »
Quote from: Matthew on May 16, 2019, 04:48:39 PM
Garrigou-Lagrange is a completely orthodox, non-Modernist theologian.
Those that have eyes to see, let them see. 


Quote
Fr. Garrigou-Lagrange was a 20th century teacher of John Paul II and many other Vatican II modernists.

By their fruits you shall know them.

I'd go with another teacher from a better time, there's 19 centuries and innumerable saints to choose from.
Logged

Offline X

Re: Spiritual pleasures ⋙ carnal pleasures.
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2019, 06:23:04 PM »
Lagrange was a mixed bag, in my opinion:

Perfectly orthodox in strictly doctrinal works, but sometimes “questionable” in exegesis and liturgical matters.
Logged

Offline cathman7

Re: Spiritual pleasures ⋙ carnal pleasures.
« Reply #14 on: May 16, 2019, 08:46:42 PM »
Quote from: X on May 16, 2019, 06:23:04 PM
Lagrange was a mixed bag, in my opinion:

Perfectly orthodox in strictly doctrinal works, but sometimes “questionable” in exegesis and liturgical matters.
In what way was he "questionable" on liturgical matters specifically? 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
« previous next »