Your letter doesn't even mention palmar.
It is the only +Thuc letter in existence that even remotely fits what The Angelus claimed. If you can find another (you can't), post it
And my referenced post does not admit that. It says that the claim that it is not true is what can't be verified.
You feeling alright bro?
Your words:
Compare that with the very credible reporting that Thuc withheld his intention deliberately.
Mind you, the "very credible reporting" in question was literally "+Thuc said x, y, and z. What's a source?". This is "very credible reporting" in Tom's view
Now there is some arguments that is not true, but the point is that we cant verify that because he is dead.
If you are going to admit the possibility of The Angelus being wrong, but not verifiably so because +Thuc is dead...it follows that what was reported in The Angelus cannot be proven true...because +Thuc is dead. Do you follow?