Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Permanent Chapel in Alberta, Canada  (Read 3742 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Permanent Chapel in Alberta, Canada
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2026, 05:17:56 PM »
Attached 

Re: Permanent Chapel in Alberta, Canada
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2026, 05:55:40 PM »
^^And this is the +TDS on display

Here is the letter which the author of the The Angelus article either misread or deliberately misinterpreted 

You will notice there is no declaration of the orders being null and void, no mention of a withholding of intention:



And here is Tom admitting that what was reported in The Angelus cannot be verified :laugh2:

https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/thuc-novus-ordo-pics/msg1005669/#msg1005669


Re: Permanent Chapel in Alberta, Canada
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2026, 06:01:20 PM »
Your letter doesn't even mention palmar.


And my referenced post does not admit that. It says that the claim that it is not true is what can't be verified.

You feeling alright bro?

Re: Permanent Chapel in Alberta, Canada
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2026, 06:33:07 PM »
Your letter doesn't even mention palmar.
It is the only +Thuc letter in existence that even remotely fits what The Angelus claimed. If you can find another (you can't), post it

Quote
And my referenced post does not admit that. It says that the claim that it is not true is what can't be verified.

You feeling alright bro?


Your words:

Quote
Compare that with the very credible reporting that Thuc withheld his intention deliberately.
Mind you, the "very credible reporting" in question was literally "+Thuc said x, y, and z. What's a source?". This is "very credible reporting" in Tom's view

Quote
Now there is some arguments that is not true, but the point is that we cant verify that because he is dead.
If you are going to admit the possibility of The Angelus being wrong, but not verifiably so because +Thuc is dead...it follows that what was reported in The Angelus cannot be proven true...because +Thuc is dead. Do you follow?


 

Re: Permanent Chapel in Alberta, Canada
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2026, 06:41:35 PM »
Yes this applies in most cases. Particularly where the faithful might have silly negative doubts. It does not apply in the extremely rare cases where the cleric withholds intention. And that rare case has been pronounced also by the Church as being one of the times where we we must not accept the validity.
Can you cite the Church teaching you are referring to?