CathInfo.com

I am truly looking at this objectively here, having not being either an SSPX or sede Mass attendee in 1982. And what I can see looking at both lines, is on the one hand a mentally stable Lefebvre, with a mentally ill Thuc. I hear an allegation from a credible source,(not some hobo on the street or a crazy old woman) and I think to myself "hmm , we should investigate this". Now If Thuc was alive we could approach him. But he's not. We could determine whether this was just a one off, or whether he had some long term intention in relation to the Sacraments. But the problem is that the normal assumption we make about the intention of the minister being valid is now longer the case. In the middle ages they determined all this. they determined that while the normal assumption is right intention, especially to be noted in the case of tired, or old priests, the one exception to all this is where the minister POSITIVELY said he withheld intention.You dont need a Church docuмent to tell you this. It's common sense. But sentimentalism throws common sense out the window, especially with effeminate men and women.

if you want to find the the reference, rather than burden me with 20 minutes of my time reading back through my posts, why dont you just google it. I used gemini to find it. and it was great. I think it was EWTN actually that dug it up to be fair. 

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/on-the-intention-required-in-the-minister-of-the-sacraments-10370


"For indeed, if there be any such, they are extremely rarely found, who have such malice that, while they perform the sacrament with serious exterior, they internally withhold the intention."