Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Our Lady and the Solar Eclipse April 8th  (Read 22112 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Our Lady and the Solar Eclipse April 8th
« Reply #110 on: April 05, 2024, 03:34:37 PM »
As for satellites, I haven't looked into the best arguments to debunk that yet, but there's this:

NASA is the largest buyer of Helium in the world.
We've seen plenty of "satellites" come down -- attached to balloons.
Recent current events put the spotlight on this phenomenon -- to me, I know that ALL satellites are such balloons.
No one has ever seen footage of a "satellite" flying in orbit, including NASA's fake footage. They never "bother with" putting the satellites in the CGI flybys they create of Earth orbit (from the ISS, etc.) Probably because it's too difficult. There are supposedly thousands of them at any one time, in any one sector of the Earth.
Every picture you google of "satellite" is some CGI computer generated, artists rendition of a satellite. It's one of those things where once you open your eyes, you can't un-see it.
Are you aware of how highly reliant human communications is, in 2024, on A) undersea cables, B) tower-based radio comms? Virtually all of it. Even some things they claim are from "satellite" are actually from towers, like your cell phone.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Our Lady and the Solar Eclipse April 8th
« Reply #111 on: April 05, 2024, 03:40:35 PM »
Here are some memes for your information --


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Our Lady and the Solar Eclipse April 8th
« Reply #112 on: April 05, 2024, 04:08:52 PM »
Here's another question that I have not seen a satisfactory answer for vis-a-vis the globe model.

Why do most eclipse "shadows" move from West to East?

In the heliocentric globe model, if you're looking down at the north pole from above, the moon is revolving counter-clockwise around the earth.  But the reason the moon rises in the East, rather than the West, is because the earth is rotating roughly (just to simplify the math) 10 times more quickly than the moon is rotating.  That's in terms of the degrees of the 360-degree circuit that's covered, not in absolute speed, since the moon is moving about twice as fast in terms of absolute speed due to the size of its orbit.

By this logic, eclipses really SHOULD move from East to West.

Also ... shouldn't we have an eclipse at almost every new moon?  Or at least from 1 day to the next.  So if on April 8, the moon is between the sun and the earth, wouldn't it still be in roughly the same spot on April 9, having moved only about 1/30th of the way more around the earth?


I admit that I'm not very good at visualizing things in space and angles, but I've tried to come up with answers to these questions, yet can't.  I saw a video from NASA where the question of eclipses moving West to East was asked, and the NASA "expert" said it was because the moon moves faster than the earth rotates.  That's a completely bogus answer, because it has nothing to do with absolute speed, but with the relative angles between the sun, moon, and earth.  Based on that answer, the moon should rise from the West every morning, not from the East.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Our Lady and the Solar Eclipse April 8th
« Reply #113 on: April 05, 2024, 04:27:34 PM »
I've actually been searching for computer models (viewed from the perspective of space) that demonstrate how the eclipse will work on April 8 ... in vain.

All I can find is simulations of what it will look like from the perspective of earth and cartoons like this one ...
https://plus.nasa.gov/video/space-place-in-a-snap-what-is-a-solar-eclipse-2/

NASA tax dollars hard at work on this one.  It's narrated in the tone of explaining stuff to a 3-year-old, where there's a deliberate attempt IMO to make people think that these people are such geniuses that they have to talk down to us.

Re: Our Lady and the Solar Eclipse April 8th
« Reply #114 on: April 05, 2024, 06:49:53 PM »
Firstly, we don't have 8600 space force members going into SPACE on-the-regular, kind of like how we have a Navy that spends lots of time on the SEA. The two are not equivalent AT ALL.

What these "Space Force" members do, I don't know. But don't picture some Sci-fi movie where they each member of Space Force pilots a small spacecraft, does his "rounds" guarding Earth orbit, occasionally docks with some futuristic space base in Earth orbit or on the Moon, etc. That is PURE FICTION, not reality. It SEEMS like that should be their daily routine, based on their name, first impressions, our programming from Hollywood sci-fi movies -- but such is not the case.

A lot more men were involved in the CLEARLY FAKE Apollo missions -- all they were working on was this or that gizmo. Almost none of them were "in on it". It's called COMPARTMENTALIZATION. The astroNOTs were in on it, yes -- but how many men supposedly went into space -- even today? VERY VERY FEW. And virtually all of them were Freemasons, so...
Most of them are in office cubicles shining their seats with their asses; and they do work like the National Geospatial Agency in St. Louis, Missouri. It's, basically, satellite reconnaissance of both the USA and world. Yeah, they're spying on every American plot of land, too. They collect and analyze the data in their atomized cubicles.