Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Job 1:11  (Read 799 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scrflz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Reputation: +10/-0
  • Gender: Male
Job 1:11
« on: October 23, 2016, 06:40:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :smile:

    Hello everyone, my name is Tomas and this is my first post on this forum.  This work comes mostly from reading the Septuagint bible and comparing it with other more recent translations of the Bible.  

    "The Septuagint (from the Latin septuaginta, "seventy") is a translation of the Hebrew Bible and some related texts into Koine Greek. As the primary Greek translation of the Old Testament, it is also called the Greek Old Testament...
    The title (Greek: ? ?????????? ??? ???????????, lit. "The Translation of the Seventy") and its Roman numeral acronym LXX refer to the legendary seventy Jєωιѕн scholars who solely translated the Five Books of Moses into Koine Greek as early as the 3rd century BCE." Wikipedia
    The Septuagint separates itself from other translations of the Bible as it is untainted by the Masoretic Translation of the Bible done between the 7th and 10th centuries AD.

    To God be the Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory, now and forever.

    Job 1:11 takes place during a discussion between Satan and God regarding Job's devotion to God as a servant.  It is a statement issued forth from the mouth of Satan himself challenging Job's steadfast loyalty.
    __________________________________________________________________________


    New International Version
    But now stretch out your hand and strike everything he has, and he will surely curse you to your face."

    New Living Translation
    But reach out and take away everything he has, and he will surely curse you to your face!"

    English Standard Version
    But stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and he will curse you to your face.”

    New American Standard Bible
    "But put forth Your hand now and touch all that he has; he will surely curse You to Your face."

    King James Bible
    But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face.

    Holman Christian Standard Bible
    But stretch out Your hand and strike everything he owns, and he will surely curse You to Your face."

    International Standard Version
    However, stretch out your hand and strike everything he owns, and he will curse you to your face."

    NET Bible
    But extend your hand and strike everything he has, and he will no doubt curse you to your face!"

    New Heart English Bible
    But put forth your hand now, and touch all that he has, and he will renounce you to your face."

    God'S WORD® Translation
    But now stretch out your hand, and strike everything he has. I bet he'll curse you to your face."

    JPS Tanakh 1917
    But put forth Thy hand now, and touch all that he hath, surely he will blaspheme Thee to Thy face.'

    New American Standard 1977
    “But put forth Thy hand now and touch all that he has; he will surely curse Thee to Thy face.”

    Jubilee Bible 2000
    But put forth thy hand now and touch all that he has, and thou shalt see if he will not blaspheme thee to thy face.

    King James 2000 Bible
    But put forth your hand now, and touch all that he has, and he will curse you to your face.

    American King James Version
    But put forth your hand now, and touch all that he has, and he will curse you to your face.

    American Standard Version
    But put forth thy hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will renounce thee to thy face.

    Douay-Rheims Bible
    But stretch forth thy hand a little, and touch all that he hath, and see if he blesseth thee not to thy face.

    Darby Bible Translation
    But put forth thy hand now and touch all that he hath, [and see] if he will not curse thee to thy face!

    English Revised Version
    But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will renounce thee to thy face.

    Webster's Bible Translation
    But put forth thy hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face.

    World English Bible
    But put forth your hand now, and touch all that he has, and he will renounce you to your face."

    Masoretic
    1:11 But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face.[/color][/b]

    __________________________________________________________________________


    Septuagint
    1:11 But put forth thine hand, and touch all that he has: verily he will bless thee to [thy] face.


    __________________________________________________________________________



    As you can see, the contents of the final statement in the different versions[he will _____ you to your face!] are greatly OPPOSITE from each other, specifically, the Masoretic text and subsequent translations of it say [he will CURSE you to your face] (or blaspheme, blesseth thee not, renounce), while the Septuagint bible clearly says [he will BLESS you to your face].

    Now bear with me here, but seeing as that the The Bible is a work of God and the source of truth, it follows that BOTH of these statements, regardless of the fact that the meaning of bless and curse are opposites, are true.  From this we can deduce that since both statements are truth, To Bless God to His Face is equal to cursing God to His face {a very bad thing, the very aim of the devil himself to force Job to do in the story}.  The fact that the world bless was changed to curse  (which I suspect happened during the Masoretic translation in which I believe there are some confusions due to Hebraic vowels) only conceals my hypothesis that in blessing God to his face - we are actually cursing him, in the newer translations.  

    Then I thought, well how could blessing God be a bad thing to do? and I examined the etiquette behind the action of blessing and found I knew that blessings take place in a particular fashion or order. Namely, from the top down. For instance, when one visits a Father [priestly or otherwise], the son or daughter should not bless the Father, but conversely, it is right for the Father to bless the son or daughter.

    In the story of the book, it was the devil's whole intention in reducing Job's stature in the world to make him perform this very act, this act of cursing God which we have now deduced is equal to blessing God to his face. However, as we know, Job's faith was unrelenting and was not subdued by the devil's works upon him and as a result Job was greatly rewarded by God afterwards.

    But how about us?

    Do we curse God by blessing him to his face?  After I had stumbled upon this and thought about it more and more, I attended mass regularly as usual and noticed something in the liturgical proceedings during The Mass.

    ""Gloria in excelsis Deo" is a Christian hymn known also as the Greater Doxology and the Angelic Hymn. The name is often abbreviated to Gloria in Excelsis or simply Gloria.
    Glory to God in the highest. " Wikipedia

    Gloria in excelsis Deo

    And on earth peace to men of good will.
    We praise You.
    We bless You. [/size]
    We adore you.
    We glorify You.
    We give You thanks for Your great glory.
    O Lord God, heavenly King, God the Father almighty.
    O Lord Jesus Christ, the Only-begotten Son.
    O Lord God, Lamb of God, Son of the Father: you Who take away the sins of the world, have mercy on us.
    You Who take away the sins of the world, receive our prayer.
    You Who sit at the right hand of the Father, have mercy on us.
    For you alone are holy.
    You alone are the Lord.
    You alone, O Jesus Christ, are most high.
    Together with the Holy Spirit in the glory of God the Father.
    Amen.

    When I had noticed this, I was startled and bothered, because I feared that my hypothesis was true. As a result I can no longer say the words "We bless you" during the Gloria, and I omit them.
    It is so bad that even during the proceedings of the Eucharistic ritual, because I fear the truth of my hypothesis, I also now omit from my speech the words "Blessed be God forever".
    I imagined that it was perhaps due to some type of corruption by Satan's infiltration of The Church, or maybe the result of some innocent mistake, because to Bless God seems fairly innocuous at first, anyhow.


    This matter has me greatly troubled, and I would appreciate any feedback from those greater versed in Theology than I am [which is very little].  Thank you for your time!

    Tomas


    Offline Centroamerica

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2655
    • Reputation: +1641/-438
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #1 on: October 23, 2016, 06:52:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wouldn't a more likely interpretation be that "verily, he will bless You..." was actually sarcasm of Satan? For whatever reason, the later translations made the text more obvious by excluding the sarcasm and translating the literal and intended meaning. This makes the most sense to me, after having translated a couple hundred docuмents, this is the explanation I would offer.

    What do the Fathers of the Church say?
    We conclude logically that religion can give an efficacious and truly realistic answer to the great modern problems only if it is a religion that is profoundly lived, not simply a superficial and cheap religion made up of some vocal prayers and some ceremonies...


    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 16730
    • Reputation: +1218/-4688
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #2 on: October 24, 2016, 12:09:27 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • You have a point there. However the authentic interpretation of the Bible belongs to the Catholic Church. These phrases should not be taken out of context. When you take these phrases out of context then you get a lot of confusion. That is what you see in the Protestant religions.
    You should do as the Church asks you to do and pray as the Church asks you to pray.
       

    Offline St Jerome

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 14
    • Reputation: +17/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #3 on: October 24, 2016, 06:11:47 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Not everything is a conspiracy, and when your thoughts differs from how the Church has always understood it or interprets it or performs it, it is better to drop the position. One can never be deceived by following tradition; but one can and always will be deceived by following novelties.

    One should not be afraid to bless God. We do not bless Him in the sense He blesses us, or as if we blessed Him with our own blessedness. I have always thought of it as if we bless Him with His own blessing and holiness.

    Even though a priest is above a laymen, still, when a priest blesses, and if the priest is bad, what kind of blessing would that be if the blessing came from himself?

    Offline Centroamerica

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2655
    • Reputation: +1641/-438
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #4 on: October 24, 2016, 03:50:34 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: poche
    You have a point there. However the authentic interpretation of the Bible belongs to the Catholic Church. These phrases should not be taken out of context. When you take these phrases out of context then you get a lot of confusion. That is what you see in the Protestant religions.
    You should do as the Church asks you to do and pray as the Church asks you to pray.
       



    You will see that in my comment I sent him to get information about what the Fathers of the Church said about this specific text. But I don't think it is a huge deal like the poster makes it out to be.

    While it is true that authentic interpretation belongs to the Church alone, I don't think this should be exaggerrated to the extent of leaving a person incapable of meditating upon the words of Sacred Scripture. It's pretty obvious that the Child Jesus in the temple with the doctors of the law was saying things to bring into the open the prophesies regarding the Messiah and that the Messiah would be God and dwell among us and be sacrificed for us abolishing the Old Law sacrifices which were being carried out at that exact moment...but it doesn't explicitly say this in Scripture. That doesn't mean that when we meditate upon Scripture without having any authentic interpretation regarding certain circuмstances, that we must remain mentally mute and not allow any thought whatsoever to enter in. That interpretation belongs to the Church is a doctrinal matter dealing with Church Doctrine. There is nothing wrong with pondering the words and their meaning. This is fully advanced and promoted by all the Saints of the Church.
    We conclude logically that religion can give an efficacious and truly realistic answer to the great modern problems only if it is a religion that is profoundly lived, not simply a superficial and cheap religion made up of some vocal prayers and some ceremonies...


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31179
    • Reputation: +27094/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #5 on: October 24, 2016, 04:48:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • To the OP --

    Let's start with Bishop Challoner's commentary, laying aside our own private interpretations for the moment (if you don't mind):

    Quote
    [5] Blessed: For greater horror of the very thought of blasphemy, the scripture both here and ver. 11, and in the following chapter, ver. 5 and 9, uses the word bless to signify its contrary.


    This explanation seems perfectly reasonable to me.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4621/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #6 on: October 24, 2016, 05:20:34 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: scrflz
    Hello everyone, my name is Tomas and this is my first post on this forum.  This work comes mostly from reading the Septuagint bible and comparing it with other more recent translations of the Bible.  


    Hello Tomas.  Welcome to the forum.

    I see that you didn't check the translations from The Inclusive Bible and the Queen James Bible (that would be the "gαy-friendly" bible), both available through amazon.com.

    If you truly want to study the Scriptures in English, I suggest you stick with the approved translations.  That would be the Douay-Rheims and the Challoner edition's commentary is probably one of the best.  All the other translations, not being approved by the Catholic Church, are worthless at best.  Most of them have as much value to the Christian as the two I noted above.

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1090/-2220
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #7 on: October 24, 2016, 10:41:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: scrflz
    Hello everyone, my name is Tomas and this is my first post on this forum.  This work comes mostly from reading the Septuagint bible and comparing it with other more recent translations of the Bible.  

    Tomas, welcome to the forum and stick to the Douay-Rheims.

    The NAB - the version used by the clergy in the United States - has lots of problems and should be avoided. Comparison of Luke 1:28 (the first part of the Hail Mary)

    Luke 1:28 NAB
    And coming to her, he said, “Hail, favored one! The Lord is with you."

    Luke 1:28 DRBO
    And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...


    Offline scrflz

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 2
    • Reputation: +10/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Job 1:11
    « Reply #8 on: October 27, 2016, 11:38:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • For anyone interested, I have also posted an identical thread in another forum if you would like to follow that one. http://forums.avemariaradio.net/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=164604