Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Im starting to get a little worried...  (Read 733 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pollozlocoz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Reputation: +29/-0
  • Gender: Male
Im starting to get a little worried...
« on: March 13, 2013, 05:00:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The new pope has not been very nice towards tradition. I don't think he has ever celebrated a TRUE holy mass (aka Latin mass) but there's more, sadly, he did something terrible. He canceled a tridentine mass in spite of Benedict XVI's motu propio. He also condemned  some priest who refused to baptize the babies of divorced mothers. For those that can read in Spanish,here is an interesting blog post from 2012.

    Now that he's pope, is he gonna oppress the Latin mass once again? Does that mean my parish is soon gonna be limited to the bogus ordo? If so, i guess that means that this is the final evidence against the post-conciliar church. This probably means the papacy is over or has been over since John XIII. But for you all, you have your SSPX and resistance chapels. For me, I only have a parish that celebrates the TLM every Sunday and almost never on holy days. But now even that parish might be restricted to the bogus ordo and there are no SSPX chapels near by. So if this guy oppresses the Latin mass even more, I might end up with no masses at all. Then what?


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Im starting to get a little worried...
    « Reply #1 on: March 13, 2013, 05:01:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: pollozlocoz
    The new pope has not been very nice towards tradition. I don't think he has ever celebrated a TRUE holy mass (aka Latin mass) but there's more, sadly, he did something terrible. He canceled a tridentine mass in spite of Benedict XVI's motu propio. He also condemned  some priest who refused to baptize the babies of divorced mothers. For those that can read in Spanish,here is an interesting blog post from 2012.

    Now that he's pope, is he gonna oppress the Latin mass once again? Does that mean my parish is soon gonna be limited to the bogus ordo? If so, i guess that means that this is the final evidence against the post-conciliar church. This probably means the papacy is over or has been over since John XIII. But for you all, you have your SSPX and resistance chapels. For me, I only have a parish that celebrates the TLM every Sunday and almost never on holy days. But now even that parish might be restricted to the bogus ordo and there are no SSPX chapels near by. So if this guy oppresses the Latin mass even more, I might end up with no masses at all. Then what?


    As I said earlier- if he did- it would be a blessing. As CathSamurai said- he won't- why take the cheese of the mouse trap?


    Offline PerEvangelicaDicta

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2049
    • Reputation: +1285/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Im starting to get a little worried...
    « Reply #2 on: March 13, 2013, 08:51:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: pollozlocoz
    The new pope has not been very nice towards tradition. I don't think he has ever celebrated a TRUE holy mass (aka Latin mass) but there's more, sadly, he did something terrible. He canceled a tridentine mass in spite of Benedict XVI's motu propio. He also condemned  some priest who refused to baptize the babies of divorced mothers. For those that can read in Spanish,here is an interesting blog post from 2012.

    Now that he's pope, is he gonna oppress the Latin mass once again? Does that mean my parish is soon gonna be limited to the bogus ordo? If so, i guess that means that this is the final evidence against the post-conciliar church. This probably means the papacy is over or has been over since John XIII. But for you all, you have your SSPX and resistance chapels. For me, I only have a parish that celebrates the TLM every Sunday and almost never on holy days. But now even that parish might be restricted to the bogus ordo and there are no SSPX chapels near by. So if this guy oppresses the Latin mass even more, I might end up with no masses at all. Then what?


    thanks for that link, pollozlocoz.   I posted this in another thread about the new pope.  They are trad catholic, based in Argentina:
    http://radiocristiandad.wordpress.com/

    Check out their current headline:  B´NAI B´RITH ARGENTINA SALUDA A FRANCISCO I

    I'm in Chile and read this site/listen to the station often.  

    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    Im starting to get a little worried...
    « Reply #3 on: March 16, 2013, 10:12:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: pollozlocoz
    The new pope has not been very nice towards tradition. I don't think he has ever celebrated a TRUE holy mass (aka Latin mass) but there's more, sadly, he did something terrible. He canceled a tridentine mass in spite of Benedict XVI's motu propio. He also condemned  some priest who refused to baptize the babies of divorced mothers. For those that can read in Spanish,here is an interesting blog post from 2012.

    Now that he's pope, is he gonna oppress the Latin mass once again? Does that mean my parish is soon gonna be limited to the bogus ordo? If so, i guess that means that this is the final evidence against the post-conciliar church. This probably means the papacy is over or has been over since John XIII. But for you all, you have your SSPX and resistance chapels. For me, I only have a parish that celebrates the TLM every Sunday and almost never on holy days. But now even that parish might be restricted to the bogus ordo and there are no SSPX chapels near by. So if this guy oppresses the Latin mass even more, I might end up with no masses at all. Then what?


    I get the first point.

    Why should the child of a divorced mother be punished for the mother's sin by being denied baptism?  That makes no sense to me.  
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir

    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Im starting to get a little worried...
    « Reply #4 on: March 24, 2013, 02:33:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Sigismund
    Quote from: pollozlocoz
    The new pope has not been very nice towards tradition. I don't think he has ever celebrated a TRUE holy mass (aka Latin mass) but there's more, sadly, he did something terrible. He canceled a tridentine mass in spite of Benedict XVI's motu propio. He also condemned  some priest who refused to baptize the babies of divorced mothers. For those that can read in Spanish,here is an interesting blog post from 2012.bwh

    Now that he's pope, is he gonna oppress the Latin mass once again? Does that mean my parish is soon gonna be limited to the bogus ordo? If so, i guess that means that this is the final evidence against the post-conciliar church. This probably means the papacy is over or has been over since John XIII. But for you all, you have your SSPX and resistance chapels. For me, I only have a parish that celebrates the TLM every Sunday and almost never on holy days. But now even that parish might be restricted to the bogus ordo and there are no SSPX chapels near by. So if this guy oppresses the Latin mass even more, I might end up with no masses at all. Then what?


    I get the first point.

    Why should the child of a divorced mother be punished for the mother's sin by being denied baptism?  That makes no sense to me.  


    Agreed.  Who would want an infant denied this sacrament?  Even if there is mitigating circuмstances the salvation of souls is the principal effort.

    Everything else remains to be seen.