Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Francis Issues Desiderio Desideravi on Mass  (Read 17822 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Francis Issues Desiderio Desideravi on Mass
« Reply #60 on: June 29, 2022, 07:39:59 PM »
In addition to being a non-Catholic heretic who cannot be distinguished from an Old Catholic, you're also an idiot and an immature little twit.  Recognizing you as a manifest heretic is not to read the internal forum, imbecile.  But then you R&R have deliberately confounded the two (manifest heresy vs. heresy in the internal from) since the beginning, all in service to your heretical belief system.  And it's ludicrous that someone like you dare call anyone else "emotionalized, fragile ... woman" when you are notorious for having had the most effeminate melt-downs in the history of CathInfo.  You're a joke, and you've humiliated yourself on numerous occasions.  Had I behaved as you have, I would be too ashamed to keep showing up here on the forum.

What a dumbass schismatic.

:facepalm:



Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Francis Issues Desiderio Desideravi on Mass
« Reply #62 on: June 29, 2022, 08:38:01 PM »
What a dumbass schismatic.

:facepalm:



You claim Bergoglio is the Holy Father and you refuse to submit to his authority.

Meanwhile:
Quote
F.X. Wernz, P. Vidal: “Finally they cannot be numbered among the schismatics, who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they consider his person to be suspect or doubtfully elected on account of rumours in circulation.” (Ius Canonicuм, 7:398, 1943)

Rev Ignatius Szal: “Nor is there any schism if one merely transgress a papal law for the reason that one considers it too difficult, or if one refuses obedience inasmuch as one suspects the person of the pope or the validity of his election, or if one resists him as the civil head of a state.” (Communication of Catholics with Schismatics, 1948

De Lugo: “Neither is someone a schismatic for denying his subjection to the Pontiff on the grounds that he has solidly founded [‘probabiliter'] doubts concerning the legitimacy of his election or his power [refers to Sanchez and Palao].” (Disp., De Virt. Fid. Div., disp xxv, sect iii, nn. 35-)


Re: Francis Issues Desiderio Desideravi on Mass
« Reply #63 on: June 29, 2022, 08:49:49 PM »


You claim Bergoglio is the Holy Father and you refuse to submit to his authority.

Meanwhile:
Why even bother with Theologians when Pope Boniface VIII infallibly declared the necessity of being subject to the Supreme Pontiff:

Quote
Denzinger, 469, p. 187:
Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim to every human creature that they by necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff. - Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, 1302


Or even Vatican I (infallible):
Quote
Denzinger, 1827, p. 454:
Furthermore We teach and declare that the Roman Church, by the disposition of the Lord, holds the sovereignty of ordinary power over all others, and that this power of jurisdiction on the part of the Roman Pontiff, which is truly episcopal, is immediate; and with respect to this the pastors and the faithful of whatever rite and dignity, both as separate individuals and all together, are bound by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience, not only in things which pertain to faith and morals, but also in those which pertain to the discipline and government of the Church [which is] spread over the whole world, so that the Church of Christ, protected not only by the Roman Pontiff, but by the unity of communion as well as of the profession of the same faith is one flock under the one highest shepherd. This is the doctrine of Catholic truth from which no one can deviate and keep his faith and salvation.


If Bergoglio is the "Pope", ante up and submit to the dogmas of the Church. Otherwise, continue to be a schismatic.

Re: Francis Issues Desiderio Desideravi on Mass
« Reply #64 on: June 29, 2022, 09:09:43 PM »


You claim Bergoglio is the Holy Father and you refuse to submit to his authority.

Meanwhile:

Are you and your sock puppet DL seriously degenerating the conversation all the way back to SEDE 101, as though this conversation were occurring for the first time?

:facepalm:

Now I can understand the painful meme: It’s like giving birth over and over again to explain to you your schismatic position.