Defende Nos #91
SSPX District of Nigeria
(Part II of II)
PADRE PIO'S PRAYER OF THANKSGIVING AFTER MASS
Stay with me, Lord, for it is necessary to have You present so that I do not forget You. You know how easily I abandon You. Stay with me, Lord, because I am weak and I need Your strength, that I may not fall so often. Stay with me, Lord, for You are my life, and without You, I am without fervor. Stay with me, Lord, for You are my light, and without You, I am in darkness. Stay with me, Lord, to show me Your will. Stay with me, Lord, so that I hear Your voice and follow You. Stay with me, Lord, for I desire to love You very much, and always be in Your company. Stay with me, Lord, if You wish me to be faithful to You. Stay with me, Lord, for as poor as my soul is, I want it to be a place of consolation for You, a nest of love. Stay with me, Jesus, for it is getting late and the day is coming to a close, and life passes; death, judgment, eternity approach. It is necessary to renew my strength, so that I will not stop along the way–for that, I need You. It is getting late and death approaches, I fear the darkness, the temptations, the dryness, the cross, the sorrows. O how I need You, my Jesus, in this night of exile! Stay with me tonight, Jesus, in life with all its dangers. I need You. Let me recognize You as Your disciples did at the breaking of the bread, so that the Eucharistic Communion will be the Light which disperses the darkness, the force which sustains me, the unique joy of my heart. Stay with me, Lord, because at the hour of my death, I want to remain united to You, if not by communion, at least by grace and love. Stay with me, Jesus, I do not ask for divine consolation, because I do not merit it, but the gift of Your Presence. Oh yes, I ask this of You! Stay with me, Lord, for it is You alone I look for, Your Love, Your Grace, Your Will, Your Heart, Your Spirit because I love You and ask no other reward but to love You more and more. With a firm love, I will love You with all my heart while on earth and continue to love You perfectly during all eternity. Amen.
Answers to the Readers:Q: Is Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ Really Evil?
Answer: Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ certainly presents itself as innocuous, that is as a fraternal organization concerned about humanity and striving to do good for humanity. However, this appearance of good is but a coverup for the real agenda. Among the very many encyclicals of the Popes condemning Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, the best description of its evil is contained in the 1888 Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII, Humanum Genus.
The real problem with Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is its refusal of the divine plan, of divine revelation, of the supernatural order of grace, of the very existence of God, the Holy Trinity, of the Incarnation, the Redemption, the Catholic Church and all its teachings. Its evil is, then, a direcr rebellion against Almighty God: “the partisans of evil seem to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons. No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself. They are planning the destruction of holy Church publicly and openly, and this with the set purpose of utterly despoiling the nations of Christendom, if it were possible, of the blessings obtained for us through Jesus Christ our Saviour.” (§2).
NATURALISM
The essential error of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is naturalism. This is the teaching that denies the existence of a supernatural order, and in particular of the very possibility of divine revelation, and of truth that cannot be understood by the human intellect. This is the reason for their constant attacks against the Catholic Church, and the Papacy, for the Church is the guardian of supernaturally revealed truth, and of the sacraments and teachings bestowed upon it by Our Lord Jesus Christ. “Their ultimate purpose... the utter overthrow of that wole religious and political order of the world which the Christian teaching has produced, and the substitution of a new state of things in accordance with their ideas, off which the foundations and laws shall be drawn from mere Naturalism” (§10).
Indifferentism is the consequence of this Naturalism, for it denies the very possibility of objective, divinely revealed truth. “As all who offer themselves are received whatever may be their religion, they thereby teach the great error of this age – that a regard for religion should be held as an indifferent matter, and that all religions are alike. This manner of reasoning is calculated to bring about the ruin of all forms of religion, and especially of the Catholic religion, which, as it is the only one that is true, cannot, without great injustice, be regarded as merely equal to other religions”(§16).
SATAN’S REBELLION
A further consequence is a denial of the truths that are evident to the natural light of human reason itself. It does this by allowing perfect freedom to its members on all truth, so that none can be regarded as certain and objective. Thus they come to deny “the existence of God, the immaterial nature of the human soul, and its immortality” (17). The consequence of this is the abandonment of the moral law written into nature itself, which forbids such things as murder, stealing, cheating, corruption, euthanasia, abortion, contraception, divorce, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity – all against the natural law and characteristic of our modern society. “For wherever, by removing Christian education, the sect has begun more completely to rule, there goodness and integrity of morals have begun quickly to perish, monstrous and shameful opinions have grown up and the audacity of evil deeds has risen to a high degree.” (§19).
This in turn leads to the destruction of marriage and of the family, to materialism and to the consequence of atheistic materialism, which is Communism, with its direct attack on the Catholic Church. Is it any wonder that the Pope calls Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ “the kingdom of Satan, in whose possession and control are all whosoever follow the fatal example of their leader and of our first parents, God, and many aims also against God. (§1).
Leo XIII also points out that Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ has always had a special hatred for the Papacy, for the Roman Pontiff is the defensor of the supernatural order that they reject. “The partisans of the sects openly declare what in secret they have for a long time plotted, that the sacred power of the Pontiffs must be abolished, and that the Pontificate itself, founded by divine right, must be utterly destroyed.” (§15). It was his predecessor, Pope Pius IX, who published the docuмents of the Carbonari sect of the freemasons, indicating their plan to overcome the Papacy: “What we must ask for, what we should look for and wait for, as the Jєωs wait for the Messiah, is a Pope according to our needs....and this Pontiff, like most of his contemporaries, will be necessarily more or less imbued with the Italian and humanitarian principles that we are going to put into circulation” (Quoted by Archbishop Lefebvre, They have uncrowned Him, p. 147).
In fact, it is the freemasonic principles of Liberty, Fraternity and Equality, humanitarian principles of the Enlightenment of the 18th century and of the French Revolution of 1789, that later became the motivation for all the changes brought about in the Church since Vatican II. The destruction of authority and of the Magisterium, of the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the introduction of Religious Liberty and Ecuмenism, democratic collegiality and synodality, and preoccupation with the environment and social justice, rather than the commandments of God and the salvation of souls, these are all manifestations of Freemasonic Naturalism. Is it any wonder that Archbishop Lefebvre wrote: “The changes and reforms that were effected during and after Vatican Council II, and which were inspired by a Modernism and false Ecuмenism that take their origin from Masonic doctrine, are all infectious reforms. I cease not to repeat: these reforms are vitiated, because they no longer contain the Catholic spirit. They exude another spirit: Those who accustom themselves to live according to these reforms and to use them, no longer have the Catholic spirit. (Against the Heresies, p. 73).
Consequently, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is not only evil, but it is the direct enemy of the Catholic Church, and moreover, it has succeeded in infiltrating into the Church, so as to corrupt it from within. It is consequently the enemy against which we must fight by our prayers and sacrifices, as do the members of the Militia Immaculatae when they pray: “O Mary conceived with sin, pray for us who have recourse to Thee, and also for those who do not have recourse to Thee, especially for Freemasons and for those who are commended to Thy care”.
OUR HEAVENLY FRIENDSWhen she was 56, Angela Merici said "No" to the Pope. She was aware that Clement VII was offering her a great honor and a great opportunity to serve when he asked her to take charge of a religious order of nursing sisters. But Angela knew that nursing was not what God had called her to do with her life.
She had just returned from a trip to the Holy Land. On the way there she had fallen ill and become blind. Nevertheless, she insisted on continuing her pilgrimage and toured the holy sites with the devotion of her heart rather than her eyes. On the way back, she had recovered her sight. But this must have been a reminder to her not to shut her eyes to the needs she saw around her, not to shut her heart to God's call.
All around her hometown she saw poor girls with no education and no hope. In the fifteenth and sixteenth century that Angela lived in, education for women was for the rich or for nuns. Angela herself had learned everything on her own. Her parents had died when she was ten and she had gone to live with an uncle. She was deeply disturbed when her sister died without receiving the sacraments. A vision reassured her that her sister was safe in God's care -- and also prompted her to dedicate her life to God.
When her uncle died, she returned to her hometown and began to notice how little education the girls had. But who would teach them? Times were much different then. Women weren't allowed to be teachers and unmarried women were not supposed to go out by themselves -- even to serve others. Nuns were the best educated women but they weren't allowed to leave their cloisters. There were no teaching orders of sisters like we have today.
But in the meantime, these girls grew up without education in religion or anything at all. These girls weren't being helped by the old ways, so Angela invented a new way. She brought together a group of unmarried women, fellow Franciscan tertiaries and other friends, who went out into the streets to gather up the girls they saw and teach them. These women had little money and no power, but were bound together by their dedication to education and commitment to Christ. Living in their own homes, they met for prayer and classes where Angela reminded them, " Reflect that in reality you have a greater need to serve [the poor] than they have of your service." They were sosuccessful in their service that Angela was asked to bring her innovative approach to education to other cities, and impressed many people, including the pope.
Though she turned him down, perhaps the pope's request gave her the inspiration or the push to make her little group more formal. Although it was never a religious order in her lifetime, Angela's Company of Saint Ursula, or the Ursulines, was the first group of women religious to work outside the cloister and the first teaching order of women.
It took many years of frustration before Angela's radical ideas of education for all and unmarried women in service were accepted. They are commonplace to us now because people like Angela wanted to help others no matter what the cost. Angela reminds us of her approach to change: "Beware of trying to accomplish anything by force, for God has given every single person free will and desires to constrain none; he merely shows them the way, invites them and counsels them."
Saint Angela Merici reassured her Sisters who were afraid to lose her in death: "I shall continue to be more alive than I was in this life, and I shall see you better and shall love more the good deeds which I shall see you doing continually, and I shall be able to help you more."
She died in 1540, at about seventy years old. Her feast day is 1st of June.
Question: Should I attend the New Mass when I cannot travel to attend the traditional Mass? Answer: The answer to this question is fundamental to our understanding of the crisis in the Church. The answer that will be given by the priests who accepted the 2007 Motu proprio of Pope Benedict XVI, Summorum pontificuм, is quite clear. The New Mass is the “ordinary” form of the Roman rite, and the traditional Mass is the “extraordinary form”. While a person might have a personal preference for one or the other, such a personal preference does not exempt him from the general law of the Church, making the assistance at the New Mass on Sundays an obligation in conscience. Such can be the only logical answer of those priests and communities approved by the bishops and post-conciliar Rome, but who celebrate the traditional Mass as am extraordinary form of the Mass.
However, the answer to this question will be quite different from a priest who celebrates the traditional Mass to preserve the Catholic Faith, and in virtue of the perpetual right guaranteed by the Papal Bull Quo primum of Saint Pius V (1570). Such a priest will clearly be free to profess the truth, namely that the New Mass of Paul VI is a modernist compromise, in particular undermining belief in the divinity of Christ, in the Real Presence, and in the propitiatory value of the sacrifice of the Mass. He will affirm that it is a compromise that attempts to fuse together some (not all) Catholic externals with a neo-protestant and neo-modernist way of thinking and acting.
If you, a traditional Catholic, assist at the traditional Mass, it is not because of personal preference for an old-fashioned “extraordinary” form. It is because you want to keep the Faith, live the Faith, sanctify your soul and go to Heaven, and because you know that the traditional Mass hallowed by continuous centuries of use by saints, is the most powerful means to do this that God has given to His Church. If you were to go to the New Mass when unable to travel to the traditional Mass, you would risk losing your Faith, you would be scandalized by the disrespect for God in the Blessed Sacrament, and you would not only fail to grow in the Faith and in the love of God, but would be in grave danger of bitterness and cynicism about a Church that has become so lukewarm as to allow such an abuse on such a widespread basis. If sacrilege is always present in the New Mass to some extent, forbidding our participation, it is even more clearly the case when Holy Communion is administered in the hand, practically denying the doctrine that Christi is present whole and entire in every particle.
Consequently, for the love of Jesus who died for our sins, who lives in the Blessed Sacrament, always interceding for our behalf, do not participate in the New Mass. All the moral theologians say that the positive laws of the Church (such as attendance at Sunday Mass) do not oblige under grave inconvenience. That is why a person is not obliged to travel more than one hour to get to Sunday Mass. One hour travel time is considered a grave inconvenience. In this case, the grave inconvenience is the participation in a liturgy that is offensive to God, and quite simply evil, deliberately deprived of the beauty, goodness, truth, integrity and holiness that characterize all the prayers and ceremonies of the true Catholic Mass. Instead pray your Rosary and your Mass prayers, read or listen to good sermons and traditional books, or spend a holy hour with Our Lord. In this way you will sanctify the Lord’s day and fulfill the third commandment of God, even though it is impossible for you to fulfill the first precept of the Church.
Fr Peter R Scott