CathInfo.com

Your ideas about freedom of speech are not Catholic.  They can probably be traced to the so-called "Enlightenment" which, rather than being a good thing, was essentially an anti-Catholic movement.

In my process of having my mind formed to become more Catholic, I had to let go of the "Enlightenment" values that are  indoctrinated in Western society and replace them with traditional Catholic thinking.  There is nothing in Catholicism that suggests that free speech ought to be protected or has any value whatsoever.  In Catholic thinking, only speech that is true and good deserves protection.

Now pay attention, Meg, here is the key distinction—Are you reading carefully now?—In an unbroken line of infallible, unchangeable, perennial doctrine, the Magisterium has anathematized Poche's position on Mosaic Law. The Magisterium has NOT taught an infallible, unchangeable, perennial dogma regarding sedevacantism. Hence, my position and your opposing position are different, but both are sententia communis, teachings which are popular but within the filtered range of theological research. A Catholic may hold or reject sedevacantism.

“Further, by divine and Catholic faith, all those things must be believed at which are contained in the written Word of God and in tradition, and those which are proposed by the church, either in a solemn pronouncement [ex cathedra extra ordinary Magisterium ], or in her ordinary and universal teaching power [a.v.,  “what has always been taught,” ordinary Magisterium ], to be believed as a divinely revealed.”  Vatican Council, Session III Dogmatic Constitution Concerning the Catholic Faith (April 24, 1870) in Denzinger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, §1792