You have consistently called LoT a HERETIC!!! But Sanborn gets the pass? How and why? Where do you think the LoTs of this world come from? Do you remember the Dr. Fasstigi debate?
Sanborn is probably the biggest hater of the so-called "fenneyite" out there.
Yes, I've called LoT's position heretical. Haven't studied +Sanborn enough on the matter to be able to say the same thing. Believing in BoD does not necessarily involved Pelagianism ... though in most cases it does. Of course, I remember the Fastiggi debate. +Sanborn opened by calling out subsistence ecclesiology as Vatican II's chief heresy (first thing he mentioned) ... and then enunciated some principles that led to nothing other than ... subsistence ecclesiology. Beyond that, I know very little about his thoughts on BoD.
Nevertheless, I would not say that LoT needs to "convert" either ... merely that he needs to reject his heresy. I'm in no position to determine who's a Catholic and who's not. Both +Sanborn and LoT profess the Catholic faith. See, it is merely my OPINION that the position of LoT is heretical, and a demand for conversion implies that my opinion has more authority than it actually does. That's the biggest problem I have with the Dimond brothers.