Not necessarily. There's a school of thought which holds (rightly IMO) that an Ecuмenical Council is guided by the Holy Spirit and therefore cannot be harmful to the Church.
I'm not talking about this aspect of the revolution, but the revolution as a whole.
He is saying the revolution came AFTER Vll and not because of it.....
I'm talking about the historically, factual revolution that started in the 1700/1800s (illuminati), ramped up in the late 1800s so that Bl Pope Pius IX was imprisoned in the Vatican, and then was defeated (temporarily) and exposed by Pope St Pius X in the early 1900s, and confirmed by Our Lady at Fatima.
At this point, with someone as educated at +Schneider, to say that the revolution in the church *started* post V2 is just to ignore history, facts and reality. It's like saying that the north-south didn't start hating each other until *after* the cινιℓ ωαr started. It makes no sense. Ideas/emotion always come before action. Therefore, the revolution idea/planning started BEFORE the revolution event (i.e. V2).
Even if you argue that the 1800s revolution is unconnected with V2, to argue that there was no build-up, planning, or conspiracy in the decade(s) prior to the 60s is just laughable. +Schneider is simply (like the new-sspx) denying that a global conspiracy exists, to keep the sheeple calm and pacified.