Frankly there are only three real possibilities that make any sense, either [1] Vatican ii can be followed faithfully along hermeneutic of continuity lines without displeasing God, or [2] there is a time and place to blatantly disobey what the pope orders decides, or [3] there is currently no pope in the Vatican.
The second possibility is correct.
So it seems to that you (to be clear I am not saying this *is* what you think), the pope is saying that he is binding us to accept V2, binding us to believe all that the synod has established, iow, to you, the pope is
really saying that which he did not say - is that correct?
If so, you are only one among billions of others since V2 who believe the same thing. If so, your opinion is proven by history since V2 to be the popular opinion.
Do you see how well that worked for the enemy, how easy it was for them to get those billions of people who lost the faith to simply abandon the true faith for the new faith? Do you know of any other revolution in history that happened where the enemy took over without a drop of blood being shed? - not even 50 years later?
In reality, the whole first quote in the OP is an audacious lie from start to finish. It is fact that like all the conciliar popes, Pope Paul VI was a Modernist and that Modernists lie,
Pope St. Pius X taught us that........
"...Further, none is more skillful, none more astute than they, in the employment of a thousand noxious arts; for they double the parts of rationalist and Catholic, and this so craftily that they easily lead the unwary into error;
and since audacity is their chief characteristic, there is no conclusion of any kind from which they shrink or which they do not thrust forward with pertinacity and assurance..."
Topic: Paul VI "bound" the faithful to the so-called doctrines of Vatican II (Read 1622 times)