The following is an excellent article from the Catholic Gazette, a publication of the Catholic Missionary Society, Brondesbury founded in 1902 (as the Diocesan Missionaries of Our Lady of Compassion).

I attempted to obtain the source, which is anonymous. I have read that ''it consist[s – I have changed the tense] of extracts from speeches made as a convention in Paris of B’nai B’rith, the exclusively Jєωιѕн branch of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.'' This reference comes from Fr Feeney's magazine Point {not linked to for fear of heresy}. He was a heretic but may have been telling the truth.

https://archive.org/stream/TheJєωιѕнPerilAndTheCatholicChurch/tmi2_Jєωιѕн_peril#page/n0/mode/2up

The credentials of the paper:
http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/article/9th-february-1918/11/the-catholic-gazette

The Gazette appears been stalwart in exposing the machinations of the Jєωs and earned their displeasure for it*  (The link illustrates, to Cardinal Hinsley's lasting shame, that he supported the Board of British Jєωs against the Gazette. He was an ecuмenist, grossly sympathetic to the Jєωs [going so far as to join the blasphemous 'Council of Christians and Jєωs'] and a thorough liberal, showing that this poison is far older than the Council** There is a fuller source I cannot remember  – to the effect that they took a strong interest in the Protocols  of the Learned Elders of Sion (I have not read them and cannot comment on the provenance of that disputed work, yet they merit careful interest by the informed Catholic on their purported claims alone)) – God bless them.

*https://books.google.co.uk/booksid=HewvEkbeC8C&pg=PA133&lpg=PA133&dq=Board+of+British+Jєωs+Catholic+Gazette&source=bl&ots=vei0XouX1-&sig=7e1rROLsOrQKY-nrB-gαyc-o46Q&hl=ensa=Xved=0CCQQ6AEwAWoVChMItc3u0ZfyyAIVxtgCh3j7QBw#v=onepage&q=Board%20of%20British%20Jєωs%20Catholic%20Gazette&f=false
** https://contemporarychurchhistory.org/2013/03/catholicism-dictatorship-and-the-world-at-war-the-significance-of-cardinal-hinsley-1935-1943/

The Jєωs have; and do, constantly plot against Christianity and corrupt Christian society (Mgr. Dillon, Vicar-Apostolic of Sydney, wrote some very interesting lectures on the relationship between Masonry and the Jєωs – sadly out of print and very dear). They are the  reduced by their wicked deicide from the Chosen People to the principal enemy of Christendom and the favoured weapon of Satan, ridden with pride and evil.  

As Fr Michael Crowdy wrote, the only Christian thing to do would be to restrain the wretched souls (i.e. Jєωs by religion and those Jєωs who do not possess the Faith)  in a Jєωιѕн quarter to thwart their wickedness and corrupting influences and compel them to hear devout sermons for their conversion [such indeed was the policy of the Papal States].

It is perhaps needless to add that the course set out above would have been the virtuous and right one. How many condemned and deplored the nαzι evil without falling into the trap proffered by Jєωry (I look on it as the Good Samaritan did  -- we must save our mortal enemy from the robbers or from the nαzι murderers, yet an enemy he remains and is not to be trusted one jot as subsequent history shows) of accepting their vile claims I simply do not know.

If it need be added, I doubt not that Bishop Williamson is quite sincere about the Leuchter Report and the number and manner of those killed implied therein, so, if asked, he is obliged not to lie about his opinion.The good Bishop's historical views are not mine but do not affect his office as a Catholic bishop, his good moral character nor the noble stand he has made for the Faith, a true son of Archbishop Lefebvre. God bless him and Bishop Faure too.

It is instructive that we hear little of the (more substantial) Holodomor in the Ukraine, nor the Armenian Genocide. Benedict the Sixteenth's abominable theory -- that the mass-murder of the Jєωs 'changes' Christianity and makes us guilty of murder and not the Jєωs -- indicates how what Bishop Williamson calls 'h0Ɩ0cαųstianity' destroys Christianity.

 

Well obviously, we hear little of the Holodomor and the Armenian Genocide.  Why?  Because the major information and news arms of the world are controlled by Jєωs, not to mention most of the major publishing houses.  That's just a no brainer!

I am to this very day not so sure about the "mass murder of the Jєωs."  That many of them died in WWII is unquestioned.  So did many Hungarians and Poles.  How many European Jєωs were deliberately murdered is still subject to debate.  Since I, like David Irving, believe that more Jєωs died in the back seat of Ted Kennedy's car at Cappaquiddick  than died in nαzι 'gas chambers,' we have to look elsewhere for the instruments of Jєωry's alleged mass destruction.

Auschwitz for Calvary, the gas-chambers for the Cross, the Jєωs for Our Lord -- which is made to be opposed to and has supplanted the Faith, and with a dubious insistence on a Kabbalistic number of victims

 Yes, exactly.  Bp. Williamson and others have noted Jєωry's vain attempt to supplant Calvary, The Cross and Our Lord with their own symbols.  They are a despicable lot!
Still, Patrick, I'm not certain why you seem to disagree with Bp. Williamson on this subject.

This reference comes from Fr Feeney's magazine Point {not linked to for fear of heresy}. He was a heretic but may have been telling the truth.

http://www.fatherfeeney.org/point/index.html

There!

And please stop referring to a good deceased priest who fought for the Faith as a heretic. Not even the Holy Office in its "condemnation" had such an audacity.

Fr. Feeney spoke the truth.

J. Paul and the other gentleman. Please forgive me. He was no heretic and I recant and abjure every remark accusing him of being a heretic, assuming I am correct in calling a heretic a man who knowingly corrupts the Faith. I threw mud around very wrongly. There was not a jot of malice, of wilful corruption, in his case. His zeal lead him into error. The rest of that issue of Point is excellent, it is a great pity that such an incisive mind which could have done great service fell into such a plain error. Baptism of blood or desire is 'of the faith'.

http://archives.sspx.org/miscellaneous/feeneyism/three_baptisms.htm
http://traditionalcatholic.net/Tradition/Information/Baptism_of_Desire.html

That is just the SSPX side of the story, whose liberal theology on this subject is also shared and promoted by many sedevacantists such as the CMRI.


The following is our side of the story. Please feel free to read and draw your own conclusions:  

This is the only official "Feeneyite" website:

http://catholicism.org/

Father Feeney and Catholic doctrine

http://catholicism.org/feeney-doctrine.html


Other resources here:

Link to “The Bread of Life”:  http://store.catholicism.org/bread-of-life.html

Link to “The Gate of Heaven”:  http://store.catholicism.org/gate-of-heaven.html

Link to “The Loyolas and the Cabots”:  http://store.catholicism.org/the-loyolas-and-the-cabots.html

Apostolic Digest on EENS, by Michael Malone.


In this forum, there is also an entire sub-forum dedicated to the topic:

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=forum&f=28

That is just the SSPX side of the story, whose liberal theology on this subject is also shared and promoted by many sedevacantists such as the CMRI.
 

The liberal theology of some SSPX trained priests is very similar to von Balthasar’s theology in some of its most hateful aspects. Many people are unaware that von Baltshasar’s belief in universal salvation was not actually completely universal. He believed that the emptied Hell will be re-opened at the end of the world to receive the "integrists," that is those who believe in the literal meaning of dogma. TIA has pointed this out at the end of a book review which can be read here http://traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/G_031_Fumus.htm

Archbishop Lefebvre taught that neither faith nor baptism are necessary for Church membership. He wrote the following in his Open Letter to Confused Catholics: “The doctrine of the Church also recognizes implicit baptism of desire.  This consists in doing the will of God. God knows all men and He knows that amongst Protestants, Muslims, Buddhists and in the whole of humanity there are men of good will. They receive the grace of baptism without knowing it, but in an effective way. In this way they become part of the Church.”

While according to the SSPX school of imaginary theology, Protestants, Muslims, and Buddhists can all be anonymous members of the Mystical Body of Christ; there are a group of people who some SSPX trained priests say are definitely excluded from membership in the Church: Catholics who believe in the literal meaning of dogma.

CANON V.-If any one saith, that baptism is free, that is, not necessary unto salvation; let him be anathema.
CANON II.-If any one saith, that true and natural water is not of necessity for baptism, and, on that account, wrests, to some sort of metaphor, those words of our Lord Jesus Christ; Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost; let him be anathema.

Thank you J. Paul, I agree.  Fr. Feeney had it right and he had many enemies, because he found the enemy and tried to expose them.  Fr. Feeney was not disobediant, and no reason to be what is said to be  excommunicated.  How many saints had the same thing thrown at them more than once?!

Paul Singer just donated to Rubio's presidential campaign.

Do these people really need all this money to run for President?  Win or lose what happens to these donations?