I can personally attest to the invaluable contribution this book has made to the history of modern cosmology as well as Church history as it discerns and explains cosmological and historical truths as seen through the eyes of truth, i.e. through the eyes of traditional Catholicism. I have placed it here at this time in tribute to Cassini who quite recently disclosed his diagnosis of a greatly debilitating disease.  See Bad news for Cassini - page 1 - Catholic Living in the Modern World - Catholic Info

Cassini, under the pen name James Redmond O'Hanlon (a most interesting choice as you will see if you look up Redmond O'Hanlon!), is the self-disclosed author of this most incredible work, The Earthmovers which is the subject of perhaps one of the longest and most viewed threads on CathInfo as seen at THE EARTHMOVERS - page 1 - Fighting Errors in the Modern World - Catholic Info.  May, God willing, this work stand the test of time and grow in significance and influence, especially as an attraction to the traditional Catholic Faith.




The Earthmovers (PDF) – Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation
The Earthmovers (PDF)

One of the greatest obstacles to the restoration of the Faith is the difficulty of identifying and eradicating the roots of the revolution against it.  In his monumental work The Earthmovers, author James Redmond O’Hanlon exposes the roots of the revolution in the rejection of God’s Revelation regarding the position of the Earth in the universe and in the failure of the Church leadership to continue the courageous efforts of their predecessors to defend that Revelation, beginning as early as the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.  In spite of the widespread belief that heliocentrism was eventually “proven” by advances in astronomy, O’Hanlon shows that the champions of the heliocentric hypothesis have never provided proof beyond a reasonable doubt for their model of the solar system and that the Neo-Tychonic geocentric-geostatic model of the universe continues to explain all of the experimental and observational evidence better than any of the competing models.  The Earthmovers shows that the failure of the Church leadership to defend God’s Word in regard to the Earth’s position in the cosmos as it had been understood in the Church from the beginning paved the way for the modernist revolution against the traditional faith and practice of the Church by exalting fallible human science above divine science, an error which the Angelic Doctor identifies as “the source of all heresy.”

579 pages.

*******************************************

How does one get hold of this book?

The Earthmovers (PDF) – Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation

Many thanks!

Thanks Mat123.  The edition you referred to has been edited but not published yet.

I have written a mini version of the effect the Galileo case has had on churchmen, a 50 page edition
and having it printed up.

Here are the first two pages.

‘The heaven is My throne, and the Earth a footstool for My feet.
What house will you build Me says the Lord,
or what shall be the place of My resting?’ (Acts 7:49)

Here above, in Holy Scripture, we find the Lord God, using the analogy of the fixed Earth of the Holy Bible as His footstool, asking what kind of Church will mankind build Him on His place of resting, the Earth. So, two-thousand years later, let us recall what happened, and see where His ‘footstool’ is today.

On the eve of the Amazon Synod held on October, 5th 2019, 10 Catholic lay leaders warned of the revolutionary designs against the Catholic faith from inside and outside the Catholic Church. Hosted by the pro-life group, Voice of the Family, the discussion, titled “Our Church, Reformed or Deformed,” featured a number of Catholic men active in trying to preserve what is left of the traditional Catholic faith on Earth in our time. One speaker summarised when and how this modern ‘reformation’ began in the Catholic Church:

‘Satan uniquely entered the Catholic Church at some point over the last century, or even before. For over a century, the organizers of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Liberalism, and Modernism infiltrated the Catholic Church in order to change her doctrine, her liturgy and her mission from something supernatural to something secular.’--- (Taylor Marshall, LifeSiteNews, October 4, 2019.)

So, what happened in the last century or before that gave birth to Modernism in the Catholic Church by way of ‘Satan’ introducing changes from the traditional supernatural doctrine of Catholicism to a faith based on the secular that led to the demise of traditional Catholic faith on Earth? Well, from 1757 to 1835 and thereafter, for the first time in the history of the Church, popes began to adopt and promote a secular story of Creation rather than abide by the supernatural one of traditional Catholicism. In Scripture, it literally states in many places, that the sun (and stars) turn around God’s footstool, the Earth, created fixed at the centre of the universe (geocentrism), a revelation held by all the Fathers and popes of the Church up to that time. Accordingly, the early Church had condemned as heresy the old pagan belief that the Earth moves around a fixed-sun (heliocentrism). This 1820 Biblical U-turn by popes, was based on their delusion heliocentrism was proven by Isaac Newton, Stellar Aberration, Stellar Parallax and Leon Foucault’s pendulum. This was the same Biblical meaning proposed by Galileo who claimed that the references to a moving-sun in Scripture were metaphors, not literal, an assertion rejected by Pope Paul V in 1616, with Galileo being tried later in 1633 by Pope Urban VIII’s Inquisition, at which he was found guilty of suspected heresy. It was this change of Biblical meaning that began the revision of Church doctrine, her liturgy and her mission from something supernatural to something secular.

Quote: ‘As a result of the collapse of geocentrism, which the Church has come to accept, she is now caught between her historic-dogmatic representation of the world’s origin, on the one hand, and the requirements of her most fundamental dogmas on the other, so that she cannot retain the former without to some degree sacrificing the latter… In earlier times until Galileo, there was perfect compatibility between historical representation and the Fall and dogmas of universal Redemption, and all the more easily too, in that each was modelled on the other… Today we know with certainty that the stellar universe is not centred on the Earth, and that terrestrial life is not centred on mankind.’----Fr Teilhard de Chardin SJ. Christianity and Evolution, Collins, 1971, p. 36.

Throughout its history, the Catholic faith has warned its flock that Satan is the ‘Father of lies,’ capable even of fooling the elect (Matt. 24:24), those men who preside over the running of the Catholic Church. According to Genesis, Satan had successfully tempted Adam and Eve, the first two human beings, with the promise if they ignored God’s order not to eat the forbidden fruit, then they would gain more knowledge than that given to them by God. The consequences of this Original Sin brought suffering and death to all humanity thereafter. The Devil obviously knew if that lie worked with Adam and Eve, why wouldn’t the very same lie work with their weakened descendants? So, let us begin with the first most important Catholic doctrine to be eliminated by Satan’s deceit, ‘Who made the world?’ The supernatural answer, ‘God made the world,’ an act of faith both dogmatised by Councils and inserted in prayer:

‘God…Creator of all visible and invisible things, of the spiritual and of the corporal; who by His own omnipotent power at once from the beginning of time created each creature from nothing, spiritual and corporal, namely, angelic and mundane, and finally the human, both of the spirit and the body.’ (Lateran Council IV, 1215).

‘All that exists outside God was, in its whole substance, produced out of nothing by God. (De fide.) (Vatican Council I, 1870)

‘I believe in one God, the Father almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth,
and of all things visible and invisible.’—(Nicene Creed)

The Book of Genesis, written by Moses around the 5th century before Christ, under the auspices of the Holy Ghost, reveals that God created all, in its whole substance, over six days, 4,000 years before Christ was born. ‘Substance,’ we know from classic philosophy, means ‘what something is,’ finished, and not journeying to what something can become or will become.

Day 7: So the heavens and the Earth were finished, and all the furniture of them. And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made: and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had done.--- The Book of Genesis.

Thanks cassini!  Do you have a site where we can go to check out the mini version you are preparing?  Also, can you give us any word as to whether the full PDF version seen here will eventually be available in book form?  The Earthmovers (PDF) – Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation

I am putting a copy of the mini version up on this thread. I can continue if required. The mini version deals with the damage done to the Catholic faith since 1820. It will of course shock any traditional Catholic, but the Bible says the truth will out. I can send a mini PDF to you but only by way of private message available on CIF.

The larger TE is being edited by me to remove some unnecessary or repeated information. It covers and corrects the science involved as well as the effects heliocentrism has had on Catholic Biblical exegesis and hermeneutics as well as promoting agnosticism and atheism in millions since Galileo's time. Some time ago A friend posted TE on CIF with comments from members as it progressed. Go into CIF search to find it.

Here are the chapters in the ongoing TE
Contents                                                    Page
Prologue…………………………………………………..…………..………1
Preface……………………………………………………………………….13
Introduction……………………………………………………………….…25
PPI is a summary of the chapters to come.
Chapter 1            Faith and Science ………………………………………....37
Chapter 2            The Book of Genesis...…………………………………….46
Chapter 3            Wonders and Mysteries of Space...………………………..53
Chapter 4            The Science of Astronomy.……………………………......58
Chapter 5            The Ancient Astronomers………………………………….64
Chapter 6            The Sacred doctrine of Geocentrism…………….………...69
Chapter 7            The Birth of Heliocentrism.....…………………..………...88
Chapter 8            The Seeds of Copernicanism……………………………...92
Chapter 9            1473-1543: Nicolaus Copernicus.…………………………98
Chapter 10          1545-1563: The Council of Trent……...….……………. 114
Chapter 11          1546-1601: Tycho de Brahe……………………………...119
Chapter 12          1548-1600: Giordano Bruno….………………………….124
Chapter 13          Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and Victorious Heliocentrism……………..132
Chapter 14          1571-1630: Johannes Kepler…………………………….144
Chapter 15          1564-1613: Galileo’s Discoveries...….……………….....155
Chapter 16          1613-1615: Galileo’s Biblical Heresy…………………...163
Chapter 17          1615: Cardinal Robert Bellarmine………………………172
Chapter 18          Defending Biblical Geocentrism………………………...179
Chapter 19          1616-1633: Galileo’s Dialogue and Trial…….………….187
Chapter 20          1625-1712: Domenico Cassini.…………………………..206
Chapter 21          Exploring Cassini’s Oval………………………………...226
Cahpter 22          1660-1662: The Royal Society of London……………....232
Chapter 23          1667: St. Peter’s Square…….……………………………236
Chapter 24          1642-1727: Isaac Newton…….……………………….....242
Chapter 25          The Shape of the Earth……………………….…...…..... 272
Chapter 26          1726: Finding Stellar Aberration...……………………...280
Chapter 27          1741-1758: Reforming the Irreformable ……...….……. 284
Chapter 28          1820-1835: Reformation Completed……………………301
Chapter 29          Anfossi’s Faith v Olivieri’s Ploy...……………………...309
Chapter 30          1835 The Coriolis Effect………………..………………325
Chapter 31          1838: Finding Stellar Parallax…………………………..326
Chapter 32          1851: Foucault’s Pendulum……………………………..329
Chapter 33          From Heliocentrism to Evolutionism……………………336
Chapter 34          ‘Dry Rot’ Underway…………………………………… 353
Chapter 35          1869-1870: Vatican Council I….………………………..359
Chapter 36          1871: The Airy Test…..………………………….. …….370
Chapter 37          1887: The Michelson-Morley Failure………………….. 373
Chapter 38          1889. Pope Leo XIII’s  Providentissimus Deus  ……….381
Chapter 39          1905-1915: Albert to the Rescue………………………..389
Chapter 40            Testing Einstein’s Relativity………...………………….413
Chapter 41            Cassini’s Unified Field Theory....……………….……...417
Chapter 42          19th and 20th Century Catholic Faith and Science……….422
Chapter 43          1962-1965: Vatican Council II…….……………………447
Chapter 44          1981-1992: Pontifical Commission on the Galileo Case...4
Chapter 45          The Earth at the Centre of the Universe …………………4
Chapter 46          Confirming Galileo’s Reformation...…………………….4
Epilogue ………………………………………..…………………………..

I was moved by this weeks Kolbe Center newsletter, where a priest in Australia just discovered the truth about the 6-day creation. He admitted the Creation theology has long been abandoned in the Church, and with it the supernatural.

I do owe you a great debt of gratitude, cassini ... for all the great work you've done on this subject.  I'll always be grateful.

I realized at a young age, as the Jesuits attempted to corrupt my own mind with their heresies, how their attacks on Sacred Scripture caused so many of the young men in my class (Jesuit boys' school) to lose their faith.

I spent many years on the offensive against them, but didn't truly understand the root causes of their heresy.

That is why I give no quarter whatsoever, zero, zilch, nada ... to the heresy of Father Paul Robinson.  See, at least with the Jesuits, they didn't disguise themselves.  They'd officiate at clown "Masses", would never be caught dead in clerical dress, would dance on park benches during outdoor "Masses" during which wicker baskets with "communion" were passed around so that probably 50% of it was left on the lawn ... etc. etc. etc.  That way, anyone with even a modicuм of faith would see through them as not being representatives of the True Faith.  THAT is why it's so much worse what Fr. Robinson is doing.  He goes out there smelling like fragrant incense, accompanied by the ringing of bells, wearing a Roman collar, and pronouncing / chanting Latin phrases ... and so the faithful who hear him spouting off denying the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture can easily be caused great confusion in their faith.  "Well, if a Traditional priest says it, it must be OK, right?"  No, I submit that Robinson is a FAR GREATER danger to the faith than the absurdly transparent Jesuits, for this reason.  If you don't disguise the bitter poison in a spoonful of sugar, very few would ingest it.  But bury it under a huge mount of sugar where you can barely detect its flavor ... and it will kill far more than the straight poison ever could.  It's why Ratzinger was a great danger to the faith, while Bergoglio inadvertently served it.  If a wolve prances in to the sheepfold undisguished, they immediately recognize it and beging to take evasive action and alerting others.  "Look, flaming at the mouth heretic rainbow-flag-wearing limp-wristed atheistic Jesuit says ... "  In point of fact, even if said Jesuit were to say something true, you would suspect even that, just because of who he is.  Now, "SSPX superior, whose book was endorsed by SSPX, often a public spokesman for SSPX, does great Gregorian chant and man does he know how to pick the right scent of incense, he says ..." Which is more dangerous.

Robinson need to be called out and called out forcefully.  Nor is there any question whatsoever that he's teaching heresy.  If I notice that, "hey, wait a minute, that sheep there, I can see a gap under his arm, and there's some brown fur that looks a lot like that of a wolf ...", I am under obligation to start shouting "Wolf!" from the housetops.

Oh, not only does Robinson teach his heresy, by he has the heretical temerity to deride those faithful who with the same childlike simplicity that the early Christians and Church Fathers had, simply accept what Sacred Scripture teaches, since it was authored by the Holy Ghost, and who attribute inerrancy to Sacred Scripture, since God cannot be the authorr of error, as per the unanimous interpretation of the Church Fathers ... he derides such faithful as "Biblicists", turning the virtue of revernece for the divinely inspired Word of God to some kind of vice and (blasphemously) using it as a term of derision.

We have even conversative Novus Ordo types, Kolbe Center, many FSSP, to say nothing of myriad Prots, who would denounce Robinson as a heretic ... and that says volumes about where the neo-SSPX have gone.  "Quo vadis, Fellay?"  Not only did Robinson put this heresy out there in writing, but the SSPX fully endorsed that garbage, and keep putting Robinson in highly-visible roles, and as a superior.  I suspect he's got the inside track for the next US District Superior, and possibly even a bishop, when the time comes.

Robinson's book belongs near the top of a new Index of Forbidden Books.

Robinson's reasoning?  He says it's because a global flood is scientifically "impossible".  Of course, that's heretical in and of itself, since I seem to have heard somewhere that "with God all things are possible".  It's also embarrassing and shameful for him to put more credence in modern science than in Sacred Scripture.  AND, what's REALLY embarrassing, I've watched a fair number of MAINSTREAM sources compiling significant evidence of a massive WORLDWIDE flood even, all around the same time.  What, wouldn't that be embarrassing for Robinson, where the very science on whose altar he sacrificed Sacred Scripture would betray him and make him the fool, and he would have been a heretic for no particular reason.

Robinson also endorses "uniformitarianism" (thoroughly debunked by Kolbe Center and others), which had been invented by Lyell, bosom buddy and penpal of Darwin, and in correspondence between the two, they admit to one another that a lot of their stuff is preposterous, garbage ... but that they don't care so long as they can use it to undermine Sacred Scripture.

THESE are the types with whom Robinson has cast in his lot, while joining them in their derision of faithful Catholics who prefer the Inspired Word of God to the ramblings of atheists.

SO MUCH do the neo-SSPX labor under this desperate (embarrassingly desperate) need for "respectability", of being "accepted" by the world, by the mainstream ... that they have the blood of not a few who took the jab on their hands, and most recently they betrayed the faith by taking pride in being welcomed by the Vatican that is, as we speak, welcoming the sodomite parade during the Jubilee year.

Didn't Our Lord say that the world would hate us, just as it hated Him?  If they don't hate you, SSPX, and if the Modernists don't hate you ... then you've lost your way.

Earthmovers is the only treatment of Cosmology that a) unequivocally upholds Church teaching, b) thoroughly thwarts Newtonian and Einsteinian pseudo-science, and c) brings the diabolical, cabalistic esotericism of the heliocentric-relativist paradigm into the light. 

I agree.  It should be required reading at Traditional Catholic schools.  I'm a Flat Earther, of course, and have disagreed with cassini on that matter, but I consider that a disagreement among friends ... and long thought that of Dr. Sungenis and Kolbe Institute, but then in a recent video they attacked and listed Flat Earthers, in their list of those who are in error, RIGHT ALONGSIDE the Modernist heretics who deny the inenerrancy of Sacred Scripture.  I've always respected it when Sungenis at least TRIED to come up with an interpretation of Sacred Scripture that took it for granted that Genesis was literally, historically, scientifically, and factually true and accurate.  I disagreed with his interpretation, but we shared the same fundamental principles ... or so I thought.  But then when FEs are listed alongside the heretics who reject the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture, it makes me wonder what their fundamental principles really are.  They couldn't at least differentiate between the material error (so they thought) of the FEs and the formal error (heresy) of the Modernists?