Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: Maurice Pinay Blog preserved (until it is shoahed again)  (Read 2370 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Maurice Pinay Blog preserved (until it is shoahed again)
« on: July 10, 2024, 06:55:00 PM »
Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Maurice Pinay Blog preserved (until it is shoahed again)
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2024, 07:04:20 PM »
Archive for October, 2022

Pope Francis’ ‘Foreign Minister’ dialogues with Jacob Schiff’s American Jєωιѕн Committee
October 24, 2022

Jul 6, 2020: Pope Francis’ Secretary for Relations with States, Archbishop Paul Gallagher dialogued with Rabbi David Rosen, a successor to Rabbi Abraham Heschel as representative of Jacob Schiff’s American Jєωιѕн Committee (AJC) to the Vatican. You may recall R. Heschel’s candid admission that the intent behind his dialogue with the Vatican was, “I want to attack their [ie. Catholics’] souls.” The dialogue under present consideration is a continuation of that mission. The discussion was live streamed. The video is embedded below.
The host for the discussion was the AJC’s Lisa Palmieri-Billig, who previously worked for the ADL of B’nai B’rth lodge, and before that worked in the Rome office of the World Jєωιѕн Congress (WJC) during the Vatican II Council which was headed by Nahum Goldmann at that time.
We should note at the outset, R. Rosen wonders if the Vatican’s ‘foreign minister’ has ever met with a Jєωιѕн organization before, which begs the question, why has it happened now? Whatever the reason, it does reflect the reality that the AJC, like so many other Jєωιѕн power organizations, is an agent of the Israeli government. Indeed, Palmieri-Billig begins by stating the intent to discuss the relationship between the Holy See and ‘Israel’ and identifies R. Rosen as an “Israeli.” 
In her introduction, Palmieri-Billig draws attention to the ‘Israel’- Vatican bilateral commission (which in 2007 recognized the тαℓмυdic ‘Noahide laws’ and outrageously, anachronistically suggested that these ‘Noahide laws’ are “reflected” in the New Testament Book of Acts).  
Palmieri-Billig then sets up her tag partner R. Rosen by citing the 1993 Fundamental Agreement between the Holy See and the State of Israel, and specifically Article 2 of the preamble which commits the Holy See to become a force multiplier of AJC/ADL-type Jєωιѕн power groups in “combatting all forms of antisemitism”.
After a brief thanks, R. Rosen, a self-described Pharisee, gets straight to business picking up the baton Palmieri-Billig had earlier passed to beat the Church (@11:30). R. Rosen reminds the Holy See that it has signed a contract with Counterfeit Israel to “work together in joint action to combat antisemitism” and R. Rosen expects that pound of flesh, which he suggests has not even begun to be paid yet. Naturally, Rosen has suggestions (as his posture becomes more aggressive): The Church’s network of nuncios should be networking with Jєωιѕн power groups at the local level and organizing programs. They haven’t done so thus far. They need to DO MORE; do programs “to raise the problem of antisemitism and anti-Judaism… be active in changing attitudes,” in other words, be an extension of Jacob Schiff’s anti-Christ American Jєωιѕн Committee.
Abp. Gallagher is now sinking in posture, whether due to Rosen’s overbearing performance, exasperation that clerics are already servants to Jєωιѕн power groups, God knows. He attempts to redeem at least himself with a litany of his own disgraceful philorabbinic treacheries with the ѕуηαgσgυєs; wearing a yarmulke, etc. etc. Abp. Gallagher agrees that, yes, the Church can and should do more. This softens the edge of the tag team’s sterness, but not for long.
Palmieri-Billig wants to know why the Vatican has not yet accepted the International h0Ɩ0cαųst Remembrance Alliance’s ‘working definition of antisemitism.’ Abp. Gallagher believes that defining ‘antisemitism’ may be counterproductive. R. Rosen laments the difficulties that Jew-supremacist groups are having smearing the people they hate as ‘antisemites.’ There needs to be a definition in order to prosecute ‘antisemites.’ A definition would allow them to “legislate punitive actions … legal penalties.” ‘A definition allows you to address conspiracy theories,’ a definition would facilitate stigmatization of ‘antisemites’ to prevent stigmatization of Jews. 
Palmieri-Billig asks what else the Church will do towards “reconciliation” between the Church and Counterfeit Israel. Abp. Gallagher says there are many [Catholics] who don’t embrace completely the formal position of the Church [wrt ‘antisemitism’] so we need to work on that. Gallagher suggests a revival of Nostra Aetate, the Vatican II docuмent co-written by R. Rosen’s AJC predecessor, R. Abraham “I want to attack their [ie. Catholics’] souls” Heschel. Perhaps some aspects of this docuмent have been neglected he says.
R. Rosen notes the “amazing, blessed transformation” of the [Novus Ordo] magisterium “of the popes and official docuмents of the Church,” but laments that it hasn’t worked its way to the grass roots. The biggest problem for R. Rosen is that of formation. If the Church is serious about these contracts it has signed with Counterfeit Israel then it [ie. “Jєωιѕн roots” and by this Rosen means broadly, pharisaic, тαℓмυdic Orthodox Jєωιѕн roots] needs to be an essential part of the formation of priests, everywhere. and he “fears” this is not the case. There should be a greater and deeper knowledge of [modern] ‘Jews,’ [rabbinic] Judaism and [Counterfeit] Israel.
Abp. Gallagher is sinking again, but tries to win some approval by reminding the AJC tag team how philojudaic the past few popes have been while agreeing that “obviously” there is much work to be done “obviously” at the grass roots with the education of young people and the formation of clergy and religious.
The discussion then turns to the status of Jerusalem. Palmieri-Billig asks R. Rosen to speak on the state of Christians in ‘Israel’ today rather than an, at least, ostensible representative of Christians. R. Rosen has proven himself to be a complete liar on this topic. I will not repeat his lies on behalf of the Ku Klux anti-Christ Jєωιѕн state. Anyone still interested can continue watching the softball Q&A in the video below.

https://web.archive.org/web/20221010114522if_/https://www.youtube.com/embed/oBGXeQ7JgTg 





Arnon Milchan’s Great Grandfather was appointed to run the anti-Christian Collel Chabad by the 5th Lubavitch Rebbe
October 24, 2022


Quote
“On one family side we go back to [medieval тαℓмυdist] Rashi, on the other side we go almost to King David” [Anon Milchan] said. (“Producer Arnon Milchan’s goal: Broker Mideast peace,” Tom Tugend, Jєωιѕн Journal,Sept. 25, 2008 ) https://Jєωιѕнjournal.com/culture/arts/66178/
I don’t take seriously Jєωιѕн fables and endless genealogies, and I hope you don’t either. Nevertheless, the people who do take these things seriously are causing us a great deal of temporal and spiritual harm on the basis of these fables and genealogies. Let’s take a look at one such figure, Arnon Milchan, among other things: Israeli billionaire, Jєωιѕн spy, Hollywood film mogul, nuclear weapons procurer for the Jєωιѕн state.
As noted above, Arnon Milchan claims illustrious rabbinic ancestry on both sides of his family. His family is included in The Unbroken Chain, Neil Rosenstein’s genealogy of the descendants of the Katzenelnbogen rabbinic dynasty which we have noted is tacitly endorsed by David Rene James de Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild banking empire (until he passed that position to his son Alexander last year) and governing board chairman of the World Jєωιѕн Congress whose family is included in this genealogy. 

David Rene James de Rothschild hold’s The Unbroken Chain, a genealogy by Neil Rosenstein (right), which purports to establish a glorious royal, biblical lineage for European αѕнкenαzιm back to King David through Rabbi Meir Katzenelnbogen and Rashi.
According to The Unbroken Chain, Arnon Milchan’s Father was Dov Milchan, son of Esther (nee Schlank) and Haim Eliezer Milchan a founder of the Jєωιѕн settlement of Rechovot, Arnon’s paternal grandmother, Esther Schlank’s father was Rabbi Mordechai Schlank who, “was in charge of Kollel Habad and led the fight against Christian missionaries.” ‘Habad’ is a less common rendering for the Hasidic sect usually Anglicized as Chabad. Fighting against Christian missionaries in the Holy Land is not all Arnon Milchan’s rabbi great grandfather and his Collel Chabad (a ‘charity’ Hasidic mob front founded by anti-Goyimite extremist Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Lyadi) is about.
Below are the entries on the Milchan family from The Unbroken Chain in reverse order.

At the link below from a Chabad Judaica auction, I was blessed to find further docuмentation of Arnon Milchan’s great grandfather Rabbi Mordechai Schlank’s position at Collel Chabad. It states that Arnon Milchan’s great grandfather, Rabbi Mordechai Schlank was appointed to run the Collel Chabad by the 5th Lubavitch Rebbe, Sholom Dovber Schneersohn himself.

https://web.archive.org/web/20221010114522if_/https://v.calameo.com/?bkcode=0040759544402a965962b&mode=mini






Patron of Bolshevism, Jacob Schiff, Rothschild’s man in the US, was founder & patron of the American Jєωιѕн Committee, AJC
October 24, 2022


Quote
“Russian Democracy has become victorious, and thanks are due to the Jew that the Russian Revolution succeeded.” (Jacob Schiff speaking to Samuel Untermeyer’s Jєωιѕн League of American Patriots, May 3, 1917)
Source
From Jacob H. Schiff: A Study in American Jєωιѕн Leadership, by By Naomi Wiener Cohen.
Jacob Schiff; a descendant of an αѕнкenαzι rabbinic dynasty; shared a home with the Rothschilds:

Source
Jacob Schiff; founder and patron of the ‘American Jєωιѕн Committee’ or AJC:

Source



Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Maurice Pinay Blog preserved (until it is shoahed again)
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2024, 07:05:56 PM »
Archive for July, 2017

Saved by race: A convert to Judaism "cannot be equal to a Jew by birth"
July 9, 2017

This entry was posted on July 9, 2017 at 5:08 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Saved by race: A convert to Judaism "cannot be equal to a Jew by birth"”

  •  Says:
    July 25, 2017 at 1:51 pm | Reply
    Since Jews worship themselves is it possible they are influential in modern day “Satanic Church” philosophy?
    Anton Le Vay stated one of the pillars of his “Church” is Self-Worship.

Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Maurice Pinay Blog preserved (until it is shoahed again)
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2024, 07:08:07 PM »
Archive for June, 2017

Russian Nationalism is a masonic contrivance; a Russian counterpart to British ‘Atlanticism’
June 11, 2017

Freemason, Nikolay Ivanovich Novikov was Director of Moscow University Press beginning in 1779. His extraordinary output of Masonic journals and books was supported by masonic lodges, the Russian Orthodox heirarchy and Russian monarchy. Russian Orthodox Archbishop Platon wished that, “in the entire world there would be such Christians as Novikov.”

From, Novikov: From Masonry to Orthodoxy, by Adam Drozdek


This entry was posted on June 11, 2017 at 7:58 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “Russian Nationalism is a masonic contrivance; a Russian counterpart to British ‘Atlanticism’”

  •  Says:
    June 12, 2017 at 1:35 am | Reply
    Hello: I've been looking for the work u mention, this blog article, and I find on Amazon there is indeed an Adam Drozdek, author, listed, but I find no listing for the work entitled, “From masonry to orthodoxy,” though there are some titles listed for this Drozdek on theology and Greek philosophy–is this title, “FM masonry to orthodoxy,” perhaps a chapter heading? Thanks for ur help. A.
  •  Says:
    June 12, 2017 at 2:24 am | Reply
    It's quite well known that Peter the Great visited England and Holland in 1698, invited by William III, to learn about the art of ship building. (“To gain practical experience in the largest shipyard in the world, belonging to the Dutch East India Company, for a period of four months.”)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_the_Great#Grand_Embassy
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Embassy_of_Peter_the_Great
    Supposedly he was initiated into Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in London by Christopher Wren and after he returned to Russia he allowed Franz Lefort and his Scottish officers to establish a lodge. Peter the Great was associated with a few Scots from early on: Patrick Gordon (“helped to decide the events in favor of Peter in 1689”), Robert Bruce (“first chief commander of Saint Petersburg”) an his brother Jacob Bruce (quotes from Wikipedia.)
    While in 1714 Peter brought one Jan Acosta from Amsterdam into his court. He was likely related to the Da Costa family which name can be found mentioned in quite a few places. Mentioning this because a Da Costa is mentioned in a quote in your previous post. Another Da Costa was Moses Da Costa who is noted to having petitioned for admission into the English “Russia Company” in 1727.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses_da_Costa
    (Of course I don't know to what degree were the Da Costas in different countries really related.)
  •  Says:
    June 12, 2017 at 5:32 am | Reply
    Dear apsterian, its an academic paper
    http://dlibra.umcs.lublin.pl/Content/21581/czas17868_32_2014_8.pdf
  •  Says:
    June 12, 2017 at 5:38 am | Reply
    Dear anonymous June 11, 2017 at 10:24 PM, thank you for that data. Centuries earlier, Tsar Ivan iV invited Elizabethan occultists, including John Dee to his court and in 1555 established international trade relations with the British joint stock “Muscovy Company” which was a model for the later infamous East India Company. Tsar Ivan IV reportedly proposed marriage to Elizabeth I. Whatever the case, their correspondence is a matter of record.
  •  Says:
    June 12, 2017 at 5:43 am | Reply
    Also, In,1700: Tsar Peter the Great appointed the apocalyptic Kabbalist Stefan Iavorskii as most powerful cleric in the Russian Orthodox Church
    https://books.google.com/books?id=3nKoFMo3ECoC&lpg=PA232&ots=BYlQdL5B8I&dq=stefan%20iavorskii%20cabbala&pg=PA211#v=onepage&q&f=false
  •  Says:
    June 15, 2017 at 1:09 am | Reply
    Tsar Feodor Ivanovich (or Boris Godunov?) invited John Dee to enter service in his court in 1586. And John Dee is described as mathematical advisor for the Muscovy company in the following article:
    https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/04-2/kochruli.htm
    But John Dee's son Arthur Dee was actually court physician to Tsar Mikhail Romanov for almost 14 years, arranged by James I and at the request of the Tsar in 1621.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Dee


The Ancient and Accepted ‘Scottish’ [ie.Sephardic] Rite of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ
June 9, 2017


Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Maurice Pinay Blog preserved (until it is shoahed again)
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2024, 07:09:26 PM »
Archive for May, 2017

Nostra Aetate: A Microcosm
May 6, 2017

‘Father’ Kurt Hruby, the Destroyer
Paul Démann, Geza Vermés, Kurt Hruby (of Notre Dame de Sion fame) were Hungarian ‘Jews’ of egregiously conflicted interests who ‘converted to Catholicism,’ became priests, laid the groundwork for Vatican II and Nostra Aetate, and once their work was done, ‘converted back to Judaism’ (Kurt Hruby opted to continue his priestly ruse).
The following passage is from Geza Vermés’ book, Providential Accidents: An Autobiography. He is speaking of his fellow ‘convert to Catholicism’ Fr. Kurt Hruby. While reading it, bear in mind ‘Father’ Hruby’s illustrious rabbinic ancestry.

These are hardly the only ‘Jews’ of conflicted interests involved in the Vatican II neo-Bolshevik revolution.
Also see:
Mgr. Oesterreicher on Malachi Martin and the Fraudulent “Prayer for ‘The Jews”
This entry was posted on May 6, 2017 at 11:03 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Nostra Aetate: A Microcosm”

  •  Says:
    May 8, 2017 at 3:02 am | Reply
    more on the duplicitous pseudo-Catholic Kurt Hruby
    “One has to safeguard Jєωιѕн identity in circuмstances often difficult and obscure.”
    – Kurt Hruby quoted in Jєωιѕн Identity, p.18 –
    source: http://www.hebrewcatholic.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/JI-85×11.pdf
    “His ministry called him to be the first responsible, in France, of the Catholic Episcopal Committee for relations with Judaism. He wrote an appreciable number of articles and courses – unfortunately dispersed – he participated in the New Catholic Encyclopedia and the Dictionary of Religions . He also wrote about the true meaning of Kabbalah and the tradition of Rabbi Luria of Safed. He was also a man of great charity, Jєωιѕн and Christian. He never closed his door to priests of Jєωιѕн origin who had left the ministry and the Church, often after the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Today, this aspect may seem unpopular. It is fundamental.”
    […]
    “In line with the spirit of “reparation” that animated him, he translated from Yiddish certain texts of the Rebbe of Breslov ( Uman ). That seems to me to be a sign. For the Reb Nahman of Breslov wrote the ” Tikkun klali – תיןוכ כללי – Repair in Totality”, which believes that some psalms have the opportunity to bring to the world a little of this immense joy of faith.”
    source: Appendix: Brief biography of Fr. Kurt Hruby, by Fr. Alexandre Abraham Winogradsky
    https://prieresynagogale.pressbooks.com/back-matter/appendix/
    MIRACLE IN THE HASIDIC TRADITION – KURT HRUBY
    http://www.notredamedesion.org/en/dialogue_docs.php?a=3b&id=807
    more garbage from this тαℓмυdist
    https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anotredamedesion.org+hruby&oq=site%3Anotredamedesion.org+hruby&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.8438j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
    Kurt Hruby expert at Vatican II and friend of La Contre-Réforme catholique
    http://crc-resurrection.org/notre-pere-fondateur/amities-sacerdotales-abbe-de-nantes/abbe-kurt-hruby/
  •  Says:
    June 7, 2017 at 6:22 am | Reply
    Thank you for posting this,I have no knowledge of these “men”
    This reaffirms my belief of the Novus Ordo being a non-catholic sect who successfully hijacked and now control one of the oldest largest organizations and their properties.
  •  Says:
    August 1, 2017 at 8:43 pm | Reply
    People must throw out all misconceptions about Judaism,if having any endorsing attitude. Judaism instruct it's adherents to be practice deception . Any,and all method deployed to protect ,and advance the ” Chosen People “of an exclusive tribal God ,who's principal name is Yaweh ( See Yaweh God Of The NWO You Tube ) who's mission is to put His people first : That means ALL Gentiles out ; ALL. Christ is considered,” Another God “. His message NOT Judaic period . The Jews goal at Vatican 2 was to destroy Christ's New Covenant making Him an agent of the Jews ,and not a break from them . Christ warned us ,but learn : * All that is hidden shall be revealed”.



Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
« previous next »