JUDAISM IN ITS OWN WORDS

WHO IS HUMAN? WHO IS NOT?

"You are adam ["man"], but goyim [gentiles] are not called adam ["man"]." Kerithoth 6b

“The seed of the goyim is like an animal.” Sanhedrin 74b

“All Gentile children are animals.” Yebamoth 98a

Israeli Soldier: "They are animals, we are humans!"


“The best of the gentiles: kill him; the best of snakes: smash its skull; the best of women: is filled with witchcraft.” Kiddushin 66c The uncensored version of this text appears in Tractate Soferim (New York, M. Higer, 1937), 15:7, p. 282. "The best of the gentiles should all be killed."
http://тαℓмυdical.blogspot.com/2010/09/truth-about-тαℓмυd.html

The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jєωs
Ma’ariv 09.11.09 (p. 2) by Roi Sharon
http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/964/186.html?hp=1&loc=1&tmp=3416
Here is a full translation of the article in the Maariv newspaper of Israel
http://didiremez.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/settler-rabbi-publishes-the-complete-guide-to-killing-non-Jєωs/

Rabbi Eliyahu exhorts the killing of women and children:
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=63137

Rabbis Yitzhak Ginzburg and Yaakov Yosef endorse Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro’s 2009 book endorsing the killing of babies and children, adding “It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for [threatening Israel]. If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing wrong with the murder."
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126890.html

God created them [goyim] in the form of men for the glory of Israel . . .for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jєωs] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved of this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him. Midrash Talpioth 225a

“Who is funding the rabbis who endorse killing Gentile babies?” By Akiva Eldar, Ha’aretz, 11/17/09
“…For example, [Israel’s] government ministries regularly transfer support and funding to a yeshiva whose rabbi determined that it is permissible to kill gentile babies "because their presence assists murder, and there is reason to harm children if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us ... it is permissible to harm the children of a leader in order to stop him from acting evilly ... we have seen in the Halakha that even babies of gentiles who do not violate the seven Noahide laws, there is cause to kill them because of the future threat that will be caused if they are raised to be wicked people like their parents….”
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1128767.html

"...'living soul' designates Israel because they are children of the Almighty, and their souls, which are holy, come from Him. From whence come the souls of other peoples? R[abbi] Eleazar said: 'They obtain souls from those sides of the left which convey impurity, and therefore they are all impure and defile those who have contact with them.'...'living soul' refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and 'cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth,' to the other peoples who are not 'living soul," but who are as we have said." Bereshith 47a

“Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever… their material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jєωs…” Abraham Foxbrunner. Habad: The Hasidism of Schneur Zalman of Lyady. Northvale NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1983. Pp. 108-109.

The rabbis' calls to murder are still in the news.
Rabbinic Text or Call to Terror?
By Daniel Estrin
Published January 20, 2010, issue of January 29, 2010.
JERUSALEM — The marble-patterned, hardcover book embossed with gold Hebrew letters looks like any other religious commentary you’d find in an Orthodox Judaica bookstore — but reads like a rabbinic instruction manual outlining acceptable scenarios for killing non-Jєωιѕн babies, children and adults.
“The prohibition ‘Thou Shalt Not Murder’” applies only “to a Jєω who kills a Jєω,” write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar. Non-Jєωs are “uncompassionate by nature” and attacks on them “curb their evil inclination,” while babies and children of Israel’s enemies may be killed since “it is clear that they will grow to harm us.”
http://forward.com/articles/123925/

"One million Arabs are not worth a Jєωιѕн fingernail." Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1] at the eulogy for Dr. Baruch Goldstein, Kach Party terrorist who used a machine gun to murder at least 39 Palestinians worshipping at Cave of the Patriarchs mosque in Hebron.  Rabbis praised his mass murder and then Prime Minister Yitshak Rabin gave permission for a memorial to honor Goldstein. Here's a picture of the shrine to the mass murderer:
http://pro.corbis.com/search/Enlargement.aspx?CID=isg&mediauid=%7BC55FC619-14B1-486B-9B52-28E7B6545F0E%7D

"The Jєω by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species." Rabbi Saadya Grama, Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut ("Jєωιѕн Superiority and the Question of Exile") 2003.

“Souls of non-Jєωs come entirely from the female part of the Satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jєωs are called evil.” [Yesaiah Tishbi, Torat ha-Rave-ha-Kelippahnbe-Kabbalat ha-Ari (The Theory of Evil and the Satanic Sphere in Kabbalah) 1942, reprinted 1982] The Messianic age of restoration and redemption (tikkun olam) forecast by the religion of Judaism and spoon-fed to their partisans among the goyim, posits a world restored to universal harmony and justice. That’s the cover story, anyway. But the truth it is somewhat more macabre, as Tishby relates: “… the presence of Israel among the nations mends the world, but not the nations of the world…. It does not bring the nations closer to holiness, but rather it extracts the holiness from them and thereby destroys their ability to exist… [T]he purpose of the full redemption is to destroy the vitality of all the peoples.”], Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 13: 9780970378453, pp.774-775

“Even when we seek revenge, it is important to make one thing clear – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs. The тαℓмυd states that if gentiles rob Israel of silver they will pay it back in gold, and all that is taken will be paid back in folds, but in cases like these there is nothing to pay back, since as I said – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs." ("Rabbi Eliyahu: Life of one yeshiva boy worth more than 1,000 Arabs," Kobi Nahshoni, Ynet, April 3, 2008)
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3527410,00.html

Because Gentiles are not human, Gentiles are owed no debt of morality or decency - not honesty [Baba Kamma 113a], not property [Baba Mezia 24a], not even life! — “The best of the Gentiles should all be killed” Soferim 15, 10

"Happy will be the lot of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the goyim of whom the Scriptures say: "Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh; they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath." At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: "The Lord alone will appear great on that day."" Jean de Pavly, Editor, "Vayschlah177b", Sepher ha-Zohar (Le livre de la splendeur), Volume II, Emile Lafuma-Giraud, Paris, (1908), p. 298

"Some of the Turks and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does." Maimonides explaining who is not fit “to participate in the world to come,” Guide for the Perplexed, Book III, chapter 51 cited in Israel Shahak, Hebrew University Professor, Jєωιѕн History, Jєωιѕн Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years. London: Pluto Press, 1997. p. 25.
http://tinyurl.com/yew88mb
http://books.google.com/books?id=avh6dkSop0EC&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=Some+of+the+Turks+and+the+nomads+in+the+North,+and+the+Blacks+and+the+nomads+in+the+South&source=bl&ots=Lub48Cnk0p&sig=6TG7tQCTNP07O7_surkmR19GyEw&hl=en&ei=X0wKSqL8DJu8tAPq7rjpCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1  

"... the explanation of the matter, [is to be found] in light of what Rabbi Chayim Vital wrote in Shaar HaKedushah (and in Etz Chayim, Portal 5, ch. 2) — that every Jєω, whether righteous or wicked, possesses two souls, as it is written, “And neshamot (souls) which I have made. ... The second, uniquely Jєωιѕн, soul is truly “a part of G-d above, The souls of the nations of the world (the Gentiles), however, emanate from the other, unclean kelipot which contain no good whatever, as is written in Etz Chayim, Portal 40, ch. 3, that all the good that (Gentiles) do, is done out of selfish motives. So the Gemara comments on the verse, “The kindness of (Gentiles) is sin” — that all the charity and kindness done by (Gentiles) of the world is only for their self-glorification..." (Chapters 1 and 2) The lower category consists of three completely unclean and evil kelipot, containing no good whatever... From them flow and are derived the souls of all the nations of the world (Gentiles), and the sustaining force of their bodies. Also derived from these kelipot are the souls of all living creatures that are unclean and forbidden to be eaten, and the sustaining force of their bodies." Tanya, Chapter 6

http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/7880/Jєωιѕн/Chapter-1.htm

"Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered father of the messianic tendency in Jєωιѕн fundamentalism, said, 'The difference between a Jєωιѕн soul and the souls of non-Jєωs—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.' Rabbi Kook's entire teaching... is followed devoutly by, among others, those who have led the settler movement in the occupied West Bank... According to the ideologies which underlie Gush Emunum, the militant West Bank settlers group, and Hasidism, non-Jєωs have 'satanic souls'... Members of Gush Emunum argue that 'what appears to be confiscation of Arab-owned land for subsequent settlement by Jєωs is in reality not an act of stealing but one of sanctification.' From their perspective the land is redeemed by being transferred from the satanic to the divine sphere... Common to both the тαℓмυd and the Halacha, Orthodox religious law, is a differentiation between Jєωs and non-Jєωs. The highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mandel Schneerson, who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well [and proclaimed himself messiah], explained that 'The difference between a Jєωιѕн and a non-Jєωιѕн person stems from the common expression: 'Let us differentiate.' Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of 'let us differentiate' between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jєωιѕн person is of a totally different quality from the body of all nations of the world.'" Allan C. Brownfield, "It Is Time to Confront the Exclusionary Ethnocentrism," Issues of the American Council for Judaism, Winter 2000, cited in Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp.365-366.

Chabad leader Rebbe Schneerson taught that Christianity is a form of mental illness.

See his video here:
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2008/06/false-messiah-schneerson-meets-convert.html

More on Chabad:
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2006/08/new-book-exposes-lying-violence-prone.html

"And for Christians let there be no hope..." Birkat HaMinim, "Benediction" #12 of the Shmone Esreh

"It is our duty to praise the Master of All, to ascribe greatness to the molder of primeval creation, for He has not made us like the nations of the lands, for He has not assigned our portion like theirs nor our lot like theirs, for they bow to vanity and emptiness and pray to a god who cannot save--man, ash, blood, bile, stinking flesh, maggot, defiled men and women, adulterers and adulteresses, dying in their iniquity and rotting in their wickedness, worn out dust, rot of maggot [and worm]--and pray to a god who cannot save." Aleinu from Judaic prayer book, Two Nations in Your Womb, Israel Jacob Yuval, University of California Press, 2006, p.119

“I want to attack their souls.” Rabbi Abraham Heschel, interviewed by Geula Cohen for Ma'ariv, January 4, 1965 as translated by AJC/Paris
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/12/vatican-ii-kabbalist-sage-rabbi-abraham.html

"Every Jєω, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German." Elie Wiesel: Legends of Our Time, "Appointment with Hate, NY, Avon, 1968, pp. 177-178.

"I too, like Hitler, believe in the power of the blood idea" -Chaim Nachman Bailik, Israel’s national poet, in “The Present Hour” (1934).


ABORTION: WHO IS HUMAN? WHO IS NOT?

Judaism excuses abortion through the "rodef" pilpul, that the baby is a rodef, a pursuer, an aggressor, whose life the mother may take. (among many, see "Jєωιѕн Law Favors Stem Cell Research," Jєωιѕн Journal of Greater Los Angeles, July 30, 2004) Judaism teaches that the baby is not "nefesh," a person, until it is born.

"Rashi, the venerated twelfth century Judaic interpreter of the Bible and тαℓмυd, says of the fetus" 'lav nefesh hu - it is not a person." Rabbi Meir Abulafia decreed, 'So long as the fetus is inside the womb, it is not a nefesh and the Torah has no pity on it." The noted Judaic legal scholar Rabbi Isaac Schorr stated: 'The sense of the тαℓмυd is that a fetus is not a person' (Responsa Koah Schorr, no. 20 ["responsa" are authoritative in Judaism and supersede the plain text of the "Hebrew Bible."]). The тαℓмυd contains the expression 'ubar yerech imo' -the fetus is the thigh of its mother, i.e., the fetus is deemed to be part of the pregnant woman's body. The Greek philosopher Aristotle regarded the unborn child in its first seven days as a 'secretion' (ekrysis). In rabbinic law the status of 'secretion' lasts for the first forty days of gestation. In Judaism the woman is not regarded as pregnant until the baby in her womb is more than forty days old.

"Contrary to these traditions of Judaism, God did not say in the bible that He recognized the unborn baby only after forty days. He said He recognized it as a being before the child had even formed in the womb (Jeremiah 1:5) As usual, the rabbis go God one better and establish a term of forty days before recognition can be conferred, and that rabbinic recognition is only of the pregnancy itself, not of the humanity of the child.

"The matter does not rest at the forty day limit, however. In the familiar pattern of rabbinic modification, supplementation, and emendation, enough of these are generated to allow abortion at any time during the pregnancy for almost any reason, however fanciful or arbitrary. For example, if it is decided that an aborted baby does not look like a baby after it has been aborted, then it is not considered to have been an aborted child. [Tosefta Niddah 4:5-6]

"Since the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, the standard American abortion procedure is considerably тαℓмυdic in nature, since the тαℓмυd specifically states that if the unborn baby is adduced to be a rodef the rabbis authorize that it can be chopped up at any time: 'They chop up the child in her womb.' [Mishnah Ohalot 7:6]" - Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, ISBN 9780970378453, pp. 878-879.

Abortion is from the Jєωs
By David Wemhoff
Culture Wars, September & October 2009
http://www.catholicintl.com/index.php/latest-news/573-the-Jєωιѕн-roots-and-the-catholic-failure-on-abortion

JUDAISM’S HERMENEUTIC OF DECEIT

SIX CATEGORIES OF LYING PERMITTED BY THE TORAH:

scholarship (including Torah scholarship), sɛҳuąƖity, and hospitality
The тαℓмυd: The Steinsaltz Edition, Vol II, p.49

lying to gentiles (Baba Kamma 113a)

for "peace" (meaning, "it's OK to lie to keep out of trouble") (Yebamoth 65b)

when everyone should know you are lying, "guzmah" (Hullin 90b)

It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jєωιѕн person or his property. One who mosers a Jєωιѕн person or his property has no share in the world to come. (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388)

The Culture of Deceit, Parts 1 & 2
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Deceit.html
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-DeceitII.html
http://tinyurl.com/mzbmdl
http://tinyurl.com/nune4d

Swindlers’s List
http://citizenfitz09.blogspot.com/2011/05/swindlerss-list-latest-additions.html

"I describe incidents which may or may not have happened but which are true." Elie Wiesel in Elie Wiesel: conversations By Élie Wiesel, Robert Franciosi, (1970), p 33.

STAR OF REMPHAM

As to the hexagram, there is NO biblical reference to a “Star of David,” but there are references to the Star of Rempham (Acts 7:43) and Amos 5:26 notes:

“But you carried a tabernacle for your Moloch, and the image of your idols, the star of your god, which you made to yourselves.”

“And you took unto you the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Rempham, figures which you made to adore them. And I will carry you away beyond Babylon.” Acts 7:43

PIERCING ONE OF JUDAISM’S BIG LIES

Here is a worthwhile photoessay that pierces yet another Jєωιѕн fable (Titus 1:14):

Lawrence of Cyberia: Tell Me Again, Who Made The Desert Bloom?
http://lawrenceofcyberia.blogs.com/news/2010/03/palestinians-made-the-desert-bloom.html

“In order to create an alleged justification for the crime of genocide they have committed against the Palestinian Arabs, the Zionists have tried to convince the world that Palestine was practically uninhabited, ‘A Land Without People For a People Without a Land.’ They created and propagated the myths that the Palestinian Arabs were nomads or semi-nomads without a culture and a civilization, that the Palestinians had neither a national identity nor existence, that the Palestinians lacked an economic structure and roots in the land.” The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem, edited by Dr. Issa Nakhleh, Continental Books, P.O. Box 756, Grand Central Station, New York, NY 10163-0756, p. 33. available at http://www.palestine-encyclopedia.com/

“…In 1882, the Jєωιѕн population of Palestine was about 24,000. In 1914, the entire population of Palestine was estimated at 634,133 Muslim and Christian Arabs and 55,413 Jєωs. In 1920, after the British mandate, the official census showed the Arab population, both Muslim and Christian, at nearly 600,000, still greatly exceeding the Jєωs, who numbered 66,574. Until 1948 the Arab population continued to exceed the Jєωιѕн by roughly 2:1. Ibid., p.25.

“… the last official British census in 1931 found Arabs in Jerusalem outnumbered Jєωs 2:1 with surrounding areas averaging 98% Arab! The Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question in the United Nations found in 1948 that, except for Haifa, ‘the Arabs have a clear majority over the Jєωs.’ Ibid., p. 26.

“So much for the Israeli… claim that for centuries Jєωs in Jerusalem and surrounding areas have outnumbered a tiny Arab population!

“During World War I, Arabs fought with the Allies against the Turks in hope of acquiring national independence. After the Balfour Declaration in 1917, the people of Palestine were considered by the League of Nations a ‘provisionally independent nation” very close to sovereignty. By 1947 Palestinian Arabs played a predominant role in government under the British. “The total number of government officials was 44,688 persons, of whom 4,314 were British, 30,178 Arabs, 9,276 Jєωs, and 920 others.’ Ibid., p. 28. Arabs also vastly outnumbered Jєωs in municipal councils and leadership in hundreds of primarily Arab towns and cities throughout Palestine.

“The land of Palestine had been a breadbasket of agricultural plenty going back to the original inhabitants, the Canaanites and later Philistines (for whom Palestine is named). Enjoying a climate similar to California’s, the Old Testament description was a “land that flows with milk and honey.” Certainly, much of Palestine in recent centuries had been over-grazed, particularly the mountainous hill country of Judea surrounding Jerusalem. Such barrenness caused visitor Mark Twain to describe it as barren, with hardly an Arab to be seen. Yet, at nearly the same time, “Lawrence Oliphant, who visited Palestine in 1887, wrote that Palestine’s Valley of Esdraelon was ‘a huge green lake of waving wheat, with its village-crowned mounds rising from it like islands; and it presents one of the most striking pictures of luxurious fertility which it is possible to conceive.’” Ibid., p. 33.  Numerous pre-20th century accounts, recounted in the Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem, describe it as a veritable cornucopia of every kind of agricultural produce, with excess exported by the Palestinians even to the nations of Europe.

The Encyclopedia confirms that before 1948

“these Arab towns and villages were not merely place names on a map. They were developed communities containing farms, factories, stores and schools, with an infrastructure of doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, merchants, mechanics, industrialists, workers, and farmers which would be the envy of any developing country today…Before 1948 they resided in 12 cities, 8 major towns, and 830 small towns and villages. Arab homes in the cities were either luxurious stone villas with beautiful gardens, or apartments with 2-5 bedrooms. These residences were well-furnished with modern furniture and household goods. No Arab home of the middle and upper classes contained less than eight valuable Persian carpets. All these homes and their furnishings were usurped by Israel.” Ibid. p. 34.

General Moshe Dayan tells the truth:

“We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is, a Jєωιѕн state here. Jєωιѕн villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul; Gevat in the place of Jibta; Sarid in the place of Haneifa and Kefar Yehoshua in the place of Tellshaman. There is not one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.” Ibid., p. 34.

“After 1948, Israel took over 12 cities and large towns and 526 small towns and villages. They bulldozed the towns and villages, building new towns with Jєωιѕн names. Ibid., “INDEX OF CITIES, TOWNS AND VILLAGES IN PALESTINE,” p. 347.

“The Encyclopedia extensively docuмents from British records that, far from Palestinians depending on Jєωιѕн prosperity, the Zionists were permeated with Marxist/collectivist values, resulting in eventual failure of the "kibbutz" experiment. Fairly new to Mideast agriculture, they were largely inefficient, dependent upon regular massive infusion of Western Jєωιѕн capital. Despite a general Israeli policy of boycott of Palestinian goods and services, the Palestinians, with a rapidly growing population in 1948 of 1,444,274, were both politically, socially, and economically racing toward UN-sponsored nationhood in 1948.

“Such prosperity came to an abrupt, horrific end after the Deir Yassin massacre by Zionist Irgun terrorists on April 9-10, 1948 and many subsequent Jєωιѕн outrages and atrocities, panicking 800,000 Palestinians into flight. “In 1948 the Zionists seized 90% of Arab-owned citrus groves, packaging and storage facilities, as well as that year’s crops, looting the prosperous Arab citrus growers, making them destitute refugees.” The same was true of all aspects of Palestinian industry, including olive oil, weaving, textile, tobacco, leather, dairy, wheat, fishing, and construction. In reality, confiscation of Palestinian resources largely constituted the “miracle” of Israel’s sudden abundant agriculture, of which the new state began boasting soon after expulsion of the Palestinians. This delighted evangelicals worldwide who saw it as stunning fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, making the "desert blossom as the rose." In reality, Israel now possessed thousands of acres of citrus, olives, wheat, etc. seized from the foremost agriculturists of the Middle East, Palestinian orchardists and farmers. The Encyclopedia: “The economic achievements of Israel today are built totally on the capital base of lands, property, and possessions usurped from the Palestinian Arabs.” Ibid., p. 34.
http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/debunkingfarahsfables.htm


SEMITES OR KHAZARS? WHO CARES?

The genetic science corroborates, "Khazars."

Here is an interesting paper studying mitochondrial DNA (mitochondrial DNA is inherited only from the mother, so its study is apropos their tribal obsession about who is and who is not "human" in their view). The researchers are mostly of the holy genocidal tribe (wholly genocidal tribe?):

Thomas MG, Weale ME, Jones AL, Richards M, Smith A, Redhead N, Torroni A, Scozzari R, Gratrix F, Tarekegn A, Wilson JF, Capelli C, Bradman N, Goldstein DB.
Founding mothers of Jєωιѕн communities: geographically separated Jєωιѕн groups were independently founded by very few female ancestors.
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Jun;70(6):1411-20. Epub 2002 Apr 30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC379128/pdf/AJHGv70p1411.pdf

Translating the distinctly technical language of their conclusion, the researchers found diversity of mitochondrial DNA slightly less than "host populations" (interesting choice of words on the researchers’ part, since "host" certainly suggests "parasite"), so they postulate several separate "founding events."  Then they note a special connection with Georgia (the former region of Khazaria).

Hence, the αѕнкenαzιs are not semitic, only slightly less diverse than "host" populations, and do have genetics suggesting a slight preponderance of "founding" mothers from the region of Khazaria.

Who cares? Notwithstanding their Master Race creed, there is no racial back door to Heaven and no racial chute to Hell.

“CONTEXT”

"'Context' is everything for the defenders of the тαℓмυd. Fair enough. But by 'context' they do not mean taking into account the surrounding text, but rather submitting to Judaism's own narrative about itself, which includes how it presents problem texts to non-Judaic audiences.... The rabbis even deny in many cases that there is a plain meaning.... It is enough that [the rabbi] states it and gentiles believe it; anything else is 'antisemitic.' This pattern of intimidation and thought control is repeated with monotonous effect, by thought cops and apologists for Judaism. It is a stock response intended to frighten off the opposition, premised mainly on the moral authority of the declarative sentences used by the 'expert' on Judaism. Debate ('polemic') on the part of informed skeptics is not permitted, since it constitutes the 'misuse' of a scholar's knowledge of rabbinic texts. Debating tactics and polemical tools are reserved solely for rabbis and their allies, along with just a dash of permissible dissimulation to leaven the burden of swallowing the pottage. And when deception and 'out of context' statements serve to advance Judaism, they are all well and good...." Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit. ISBN 13: 9780970378453 pages 137-138

AFRAID OF SHARIA? FEAR HALACHA AND
NOAHIDE LAW!

“Politically, the position of Jєωs in the Christian Spanish kingdoms was the highest ever attained by Jєωs in any country (except some of the ta'ifas and under the Fatimids) before the 19th century. Many Jєωs served officially as Treasurers General to the kings of Castile, regional and general tax collectors, diplomats (representing their king in foreign courts, both Muslim and Christian, even outside Spain), courtiers and advisers to rulers and great noblemen. And in no other country except Poland did the Jєωιѕн community wield such great legal powers over the Jєωs or used them so widely and publicly, including the power to inflict capital punishment.

“From the 11th century the persecution of Karaites (a heretical Jєωιѕн sect) [“heretical” because Karaites follow Mosaic Law, not тαℓмυdic Law, “halacha”] by flogging them to death if unrepentant was common in Castile. Jєωιѕн women who cohabited with Gentiles had their noses cut off by rabbis who explained that 'in this way she will lose her beauty and her non-Jєωιѕн lover will come to hate her'. Jєωs who had the effrontery to attack a rabbinical judge had their hands cut off. Adulterers were imprisoned, after being made to run the gauntlet through the Jєωιѕн quarter. In religious disputes, those thought to be heretics had their tongues cut out ...” Prof. Israel Shahak, Jєωιѕн History, Jєωιѕн Religion–the Weight of Three Thousand Years
http://www.bandung2.co.uk/books/Files/Religion/Jєωιѕн%20History,%20Jєωιѕн%20Religion%20%28The%20Weight%20of%20Three%20Thousand%20Years%29%20-%20Israel%20Shahak.pdf

NOAHIDE LAW

"If a Noahite is striving in the learning of Torah... reveals new aspects of Torah, he may be PHYSICALLY RESTRAINED and informed that he is liable for CAPITAL PUNISHMENT... If the court that is established in consonance with the Seven Universal Laws gives the DEATH PENALTY to a Noahite, the EXECUTION is an atonement for the person's past transgression... Furthermore, the Noahite must experience REINCARNATION to be able to atone for transgressions he has done." Chaim Clorfene & Yakov Rogalsky, "The Path of the Righteous Gentile: An Introduction to the Seven Laws of the children of Noah," (Feldheim Publishers, 1987) p. 42 (The book bears an official letter of approval of its contents by Rabbi Mendel Feldman, Shearith Israel Congregation.)

"The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday..." [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4]

"The Christians are worshipers of Avodah Zorah ["idolatry"]" [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Ma'akhalot Assurot, 11:7]

"It is a mitzvah [religious duty], however, to eradicate Jєωιѕн traitors, minim [Christians], and apikorsim, ["heretics," i.e., sincere Judaic converts to Christianity] and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jєωs and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot." [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Chapter 10]

"... a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner [in other words, insincere worship such as (1) faking worship to obtain business or social advantage, as the Marranos, or (2) denying Jesus' divinity, does not earn the death penalty]. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jєωιѕн court would consider worthy of capital punishment." [Maimonides, Hilchot Melachim XI, Mishneh Torah]

The Jєωιѕн Encyclopedia affirms that the punishment for Christian "idolatry" is beheading. See:
"Laws, Noachian," Jєωιѕн Encyclopedia entry,
http://www.Jєωιѕнencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=113&letter=L

Maimonides legislates that it is incuмbent upon the Jєωιѕн people even to coerce the rest of the world if necessary to accept the Noahide laws [Mishneh Torah , Laws of Kings 8,10] ... we certainly must proselytize every human being to keep those seven laws." (Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, Center for Jєωιѕн-Christian Understanding and Cooperation
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/01/pope-we-need-to-work-together-with.html)

A Grave Mistake in Need of Correction: A Response to the Meeting Between Rabbi Shlomo Riskin and Pope Benedict XVI–The only thing worse than injustice is an attempt to disguise it.
http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/topics/news/3203-a-grave-mistake-in-need-of-correction-a-response-to-the-meeting-between-rabbi-shlomo-riskin-and-pope-benedict-xvi
Who Says Judaism Isn't a Proselytizing System?
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2008/01/who-says-judaism-isnt-proselytizing.html
USCCB States Principles for "Dialogue" Fraud
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2009/10/usccb-statement-of-principles-for.html

One of many possible examples of how the “Noahide Law” system of double-standards is absurdly preferential to “Jєωs” and tyrannical towards everyone else from the Babylonian тαℓмυd:



"A non-Jєω is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

"A Jєω can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jєω." [Babylonian тαℓмυd, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110]

Rabbis Yitzhak Ginzburg and Yaakov Yosef endorse Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro’s 2009 book endorsing the killing of Gentile babies and children, adding “It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for [threatening Israel]. If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing wrong with the murder."
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126890.html


The serpent used sweet sounding words to seduce Eve in the Garden too. Do not be deceived by the rabbis' sweet words about the Noachide Laws. They are not nearly as benevolent or benign as the rabbis' marketing feigns.

Much like the word "Torah" makes a Christian wrongly think that the rabbis are referring to the Pentateuch, but actually refer to "Torah SheBeal Peh" (the Oral "Torah" that was later compiled into the тαℓмυd and Kabbalistic books), Christians think that the "Noah" of "Noachide Law" is the biblical Noah, but wrong again. No, the Noah of the Noachide Law is most unbiblical, mocked in the rabbinical literature as an incompetent drunk incapable of fulfilling God's commission, and who compounded the sin of Adam.

"Three had a passion of agriculture [N.B. farming is an occupation of disrepute in Judaism] and no good was found in them: Cain, Noah, and Uzziah." Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I, translated by Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman (Soncino, 1983) vol. 1, p. 289.

"The rabbis teach that Noah ended as a castrate. One story has it that he was castrated by a lion while he was drunk and on his way to have intercourse and this `scattered his semen.' Alternatively the Midrash says that it was actually Ham who castrated Noah, and that Noah told Ham, `You have prevented me from doing something in the dark [having sex], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.'" [more on Maimonides' racism later] Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I, translated by Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman (Soncino, 1983) vol. 1, p. 283.

"It is claimed that as `Noahides,' these `good' gentiles will not have to follow all the rules of the тαℓмυd of Judaism, only the `Seven Laws of Noah.' What they are not told is that in order to faithfully adhere to the so-called Seven Laws of Noah, the `righteous gentiles' are obligated to suffer the prize indignity of submitting to rabbinic interpretations of those laws, which amount to an infinite number of glosses and explications running from here to eternity. A more accurate name for the heavy burdens with which these gullible gentiles are going to bind themselves would be the Seven Billion Noachide Laws.... Maimonides ruled that when a Judaic murders even a righteous gentile (a gentile who is a friend and ally of Judaism) the Judaic is not to be harmed: `A Jєω who killed a righteous gentile is not executed in a court of law as it says (Exodus 21:14 `If a man shall act intentional against his fellow...' (and a gentile is not considered a fellow) and even more so that he is not executed for killing an unrighteous gentile.' (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Rotze'ach 2:11. The Judaic publishing company's commentary accompanying the preceding teaching of Maimonides states that Jesus was an example of a min (plural: minim)." Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 13: 9780970378453, pp. 496-499

The rabbis teach that Jesus Himself was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a, 107b], even teaching such insanities as claiming that Jesus worshipped a brick. [Babylonian тαℓмυd Sanhedrin 67a, 107b] There are, of course, other numerous scurrilous accusations against Jesus in the тαℓмυd and rabbinical literature. Though the passages have been denied and expurgated тαℓмυd editions have been published, often using code words for Jesus, Princeton Professor and Director of JUDAIC Studies Peter Schafer has examined dozens of тαℓмυd editions in the original and vernacular languages. Schafer not only adduces the explicit references to Jesus of Nazareth, but he also traces the code words used in the тαℓмυd editions expurgated and sanitized for Gentile consumption. Schafer traces from edition to tractate to folio how "Balaam," "that man," "the carpenter," "ben Pandera" (son of Pandera), the blank spaces, and the rest of the code words refer to Jesus of Nazareth. In his book "Jesus in the тαℓмυd" (ISBN 13: 978-0691129266) Schafer has affirmed that the тαℓмυd teaches that that Jesus was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a, 107b], was a "mamzer" [bastard] conceived adulterously in "niddah" [menstrual filth] by a Roman soldier named Pandera [Kallah 51a] of a whore [Sanhedrin 106a] and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces and, in some editions because Jesus is accused of sɛҳuąƖ perversion, semen [Gittin 57a]. Schafer docuмents much more, including the тαℓмυd claim that the Sanhedrin justly executed Jesus because he was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a, 107b] who worshipped a brick [Sanhedrin 67a], even boasting that the Sanhedrin overcame Roman opposition to the execution of Jesus [Sanhedrin 43a].


In the context of Noachide Laws, why is this important? Because idoloaters are liable for execution by beheading under halacha, Torah Law.

Practicing Christians worship Jesus as True God and True man, hence, under Torah law, are idolaters liable for execution.

REINCARNATION

Search “gilgul.”

"The sages of the true wisdom teach that every Jєωιѕн soul must REINCARNATE many times until it has fulfilled all the 613 mitzvos in action, speech, and thought." Shulchan Aruch HaRav: Hilchos тαℓмυd Torah 1:4

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef on the REINCARNATION of Judaic souls:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/rabbi-says-h0Ɩ0cαųst-victims-were-reincarnations-of-sinners-711547.html

"If a Noahite is striving in the learning of Torah... reveals new aspects of Torah, he may be physically restrained and informed that he is liable for capital punishment... If the court that is established in consonance with the Seven Universal Laws gives the death penalty to a Noahite, the execution is an atonement for the person's past transgression... Furthermore, the Noahite must experience REINCARNATION to be able to atone for transgressions he has done." Chaim Clorfene & Yakov Rogalsky, "The Path of the Righteous Gentile: An Introduction to the Seven Laws of the children of Noah," (Feldheim Publishers, 1987) p. 42 (The book bears an official letter of approval of its contents by Rabbi Mendel Feldman, Shearith Israel Congregation.)

Cranky lawyer reincarnated as dog, sentenced to stoning, escapes:
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/230041-Jєωιѕн-court-sentences-dog-to-death-by-stoning


PAGAN POLYTHEISTIC JUDAISM

Jєωs are not “orthodox” for following Mosaic Law, but orthodox for following the perversion and Master Race and pagan precepts of the Oral Torah (see below) for which Jesus unmistakably damned the Pharisees and their followers as “children of Hell” Matthew 23:15.

The Kabbalistic books of the Oral Torah, including the Zohar and Sefer Yetzirah, are in the lineage of Egyptian and Babylonian black magic that spawned idolatry of the Golden Calf, even to the Israelites worshipping, fornicating with, and sacrificing their children to the demon Moloch (Leviticus 20:3-5, 3 Kings 11:5-33, et al.).  No less than in the days of the Israelites (1 Kings 8:8; Malachias 2:8-12), contemporary Judaism retains worship of pagan “strange gods”: Birkat ha-Hammah sun worship http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2009/02/more-pagan-judaism-birkat-ha-hammah.html (persists even though Ezechiel 8:16-17 specifically damns it as an abomination in the eyes of God), moon worship (kiddush levanah http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/blessing-of-moon.html ), polytheism (the worship of the goddess Shekinah http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/vatican-lesson-on-shekinah.html ; see especially Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit, http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/2010/03/michael-hoffmans-online-revisionist.html ), reincarnation (gilgul neshamot, gilgul neshamah http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:O1HaB8VL6lAJ:kabbalah-beliefs.suite101.com/article.cfm/gilgul-neshamah-soul-reincarnation-or-transmigration-of-souls+gilgul&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari ), death curses (pulsa d’nura http://www.koshertorah.com/PDF/pulsa.pdf ), etc.

See also: The Encyclopedia of Jєωιѕн Myth, Magic and Mysticism by Rabbi Geoffrey W. Dennis, ISBN-13: 978-0738709055
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0738709050/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0738709050&linkCode=as2&tag=httpwwwchanco-20

A bit more on pagan polytheistic Judaism—the rabbis' magic skulls:
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/181975-Rare-Magic-Inscription-on-Human-Skull

"There are two kinds of necromancy: the one where the dead is raised by naming him, the other where he is invoked by means of a skull." —The Babylonian тαℓмυd, Tractate Sanhedrin 65b

TORAH

"Jєωs don't read the Bible literally. We read it through the lens of generations of interpretations and acknowledge the evolution of human understanding of God. The тαℓмυdic image of God is vastly different from the image of God presented in the Bible." [Rabbi Laura Geller, Senior Rabbi, Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills, California
Huffington Post | April 2, 2011]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-laura-geller/acts-of-god-a-Jєωιѕн-pers_b_842215.html

"This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jєωs as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible." [Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159]

"The Jєωιѕн religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The тαℓмυd is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." [Universal Jєωιѕн Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474]

“Pharisaism became тαℓмυdism, тαℓмυdism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” [Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jєωιѕн Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi]

"The тαℓмυd is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the 'Tradition of the Elders,' and to which He makes frequent allusions." [Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the тαℓмυd: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70]

“The complex of rabbinically ordained practices ... including most of the rules for the treatment of Scripture itself--do not derive from Scripture at all. Rabbinic Judaism's initial concern was with the elaboration and refinement of it's own system. Attaching the system to scripture was secondary. It therefore is misleading to depict rabbinic Judaism primarily as a consequence of an exegetical process or the organic unfolding of Scripture. Rather, rabbinic Judaism began as the work of a small, ambitious, and homogeneous group of pseudo-priests ...By the third century (A.D.) the rabbis expressed their self-conception in the ideology of "oral Torah" which held that a comprehensive body of teachings and practices (halachot) not included in Scripture had been given by God and through Moses only to the rabbinic establishment.” (Rabbi Jacob Nuesner, Rabbinic Judaism: Structure and System, pp. 31-34)

Don’t get suckered into one of the oldest rabbinical tricks, the claim that the тαℓмυd is based on "Torah." A Christian assumes that "Torah" = Pentateuch, but there's the trick. In Judaism there are at least FIVE definitions of Torah. Here's the proof:

Please note FOUR definitions of Torah in the Jєωιѕн Encyclopedia's entry on Torah:

“Originally, in order to maintain the distinction between the written Torah (see written law) and various traditional interpretations, customs and practices, the rabbis forbade the commitment to writing of the additional material. However, when it became too voluminous and chaotic conditions made oral transmission too uncertain, the ban was lifted and the material organized and transcribed in the form of the Mishnah, the тαℓмυd, and other rabbinic works. The rabbis expressed their view that 'two Torahs' were given at Sinai, a Written Torah [Torah She Bich Tav, DEFINITION #1] and an Oral Torah [Torah SheBeal Peh, DEFINITION #2] (see oral law) and that at least some of the oral traditions relating to the meaning of basic biblical concepts were as authoritative as the written text (see halakah le-mosheh mi-sinai) In a sense the Oral Torah came to be regarded as more important than the Written Torah inasmuch as the explanations and understanding of the latter depended upon the former. A third meaning of the word ‘Torah’ therefore includes elements of the Oral Torah, which are considered authoritative or deoraita ---'from the Torah.' Finally in its broadest sense, the word 'Torah' is sometimes used to refer to the entire corpus of Halacha and Aggadah, [DEFINITION #3] Written and Oral, from the Bible up to and including the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis [DEFINITION #4]....” [The New Encyclopedia of Judaism, Geoffrey Wigoder editor in Chief, New York: New York University Press, 2002, ISBN 0814793996, page 778]

Please note a FIFTH definition of Torah according to the Holy Father's favorite rabbi, “a great scholar” [Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth, p.71]:

“... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah [DEFINITION #5], not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself.” [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of 'Being a Rabbi' in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]

It gets worse because these “Torah” are on an ever-widening trajectory from God. Consider explicit corollaries of the great scholar's presumption that, because the rabbis are divine, they can “alter the very content of Mosaic revelation.”

“...the Babylonian тαℓмυd represents God in the flesh...” Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Rabbinic Judaism, Minneapolis MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1995. p. 62

"The Holy One, Blessed be He, speaks Torah out of the mouths of all rabbis.” Haggadah 15b

"The Bavli [Babylonian тαℓмυd] has formed the definitive statement of Judaism from the time of its closure to the present day." Rabbi Jacob Neusner, quoted by Norman F. Cantor, The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jєωs, page 112)

The occultic portion of the тαℓмυd, the Kabala, at Tikkunei Zohar 1:27b refers to the Mishnah of the тαℓмυd as “the burial place of Moses.” The reference is an apt double entendre because the тαℓмυd at Shabbat 15 teaches that it supersedes and nullifies the Old Testament, so “buries” the Pentateuch of Moses.  

“Think not that I will accuse you to the Father: There is one that accuseth you, Moses, in whom you trust. For if you did believe in Moses, you would perhaps believe me also; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” John 5:43-47

The "tradition of the Elders" actually "buries Moses" (Tikkunei Zohar 1:27b), disparages Moses (and Isaias), places Moses in the 18th row of тαℓмυd "sage" Rabbi Akiva like a dunce in the back of the class (Menachot 22b).

Since converts from Judaism revealed the foundational teachings of Judaism, much effort has been invested in sanitizing vernacular translations of the тαℓмυd.

These sanitized editions are useful to the rabbis: "See it's not there." Or "The tractate is about 'Balaam'"

In the sanitized тαℓмυd editions numerous code word substitutions are used for Christians (min, Cuthean, Egyptian, Epicurean, etc.) and Jesus of Nazareth ("that man," "the carpenter," "Balaam," "ben Pandera, a reference to the тαℓмυd's teaching that Jesus was the b-stard of a wh-re who committed adultery with a Roman soldier named Pandera, and even blank spaces).

The тαℓмυd (Torah SheBeal Peh) teaches that Jesus was a b-stard born of an adulterous relationship (Kallah 51a) of a wh-re (Sanhedrin 106a) and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces because he "worshipped a brick" and, sem-n because he is accused of sɛҳuąƖ perversion. (Gittin 57a).

The тαℓмυd Sanhedrin 43a boasts that the Sanhedrin convicted Jesus and, at the Jєωιѕн court's instigation, He was crucified, “hanged,” even though the Romans were “inclined toward acquittal” of Jesus; therefore Jєωιѕн denial and blame-shifting to the Romans is a lie. The infamous Toldoth Jeschu, Maimonides' Hilkoth Akun V, 3 and Letter to Yemen), and the 1905 Jєωιѕн Encyclopedia (page 170), all boast of Jєωιѕн responsibility for Christ's death. The тαℓмυd notes that Jesus deserved four more deaths. Sanhedrin 52a suggests Jesus should have been strangled while immersed in dung. There are other тαℓмυdic passages that describe Jesus as an idolatrous sex freak, practicing black magic —and more


Pursuing the anti-Biblical nature of Judaism and its тαℓмυd:

“On the surface, Scripture plays little role in the Mishanaic system, The Mishnah [of the тαℓмυd] rarely cites a verse of Scripture, refers to Scripture as an entity, links its own ideas to those of Scripture, or lays claim to originate in what Scripture has said, even by indirect or remote allusion to a Scriptural verse of teaching... Formally, redactionally, and linguistically the Mishnah stands in splendid isolation from Scripture....the Mishnah constitutes Torah. [definition #2 ‘Written Torah’] It too is a statement of revelation, 'Torah revealed to Moses at Sinai.' But this part of revelation has come down in a form different from the well-known, written part, the Scripture. This tradition truly deserves the name 'tradition,' because for a long time it was handed down orally, not in writing, until given the written formulation now before us in the Mishnah.... Since some of the named authorities in the chain of tradition appear throughout the materials of the Mishnah, the claim is that what these people say comes to them from Sinai through the processes of qabbalah and massoret --handing down 'traditioning.' So the reason... that the Mishnah does not cite Scripture is that it does not have to.” [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, The Mishnah: A New Translation. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1988. pp. xxxv-xxxvi].

Note the casual admission that both “qabbalah and massoret [the vaunted, but bowdlerized, ‘Hebrew Bible’]” change Scripture through “process,” “traditioning.” In Judaism tradition is not fixed or faithful, but is an ever-changing “process” that is described as “traditioning.” This is why “the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis” are Torah, [definition #4] hence authoritative in Judaism.

Indeed all this oral “traditioning” is precisely what Jesus fingered as “make void the commandments of God for the traditions of men.” [Mark 7:9]. Since the rabbis are free to “alter even the very content of Mosaic revelation” with impunity, we begin to understand why Jesus said, “there is one that accuseth you, Moses” [John 5:45-47].

Do not be misled by a rabbi's mere mention of the word Torah. You must pin him down: "Which 'Torah'?" Then watch out for the pilpul, mental reservations, and Kol Nidre deceit that will inevitably follow.

“Jєωιѕн Mysticism- According to Rabbi Steinsaltz, Jєωιѕн mysticism – or Kabbalah – is the official theology of the Jєωιѕн people. Although the world of Kabbalah is profoundly symbolic and abstract, its teachings are of tremendous significance to the individual and to society alike. Its influences are evident in all Jєωιѕн spheres – the prayer book, the тαℓмυd, and Jєωιѕн philosophy. Kabbalah is not a separate area of Torah knowledge, but rather the hidden, spiritual dimension of the revealed aspects of the Torah. These revealed facets of Torah – such as halakha (Jєωιѕн law) – speak primarily about visible, physical things; Kabbalah, on the other hand, speaks directly about spiritual entities, like the system of olamot (spiritual “worlds,” or graduated levels of reality) and sefirot (divine “attributes,” or channels of divine energy) through which God creates, sustains and directs the universe. It also discusses the interaction between those entities and the performance of mitzvot in the physical world. It is for this reason that Kabbalah has been called the soul of the Torah.
The character of Kabbalah is perhaps manifested most clearly in Hasidut. By changing the terminology of Kabbalah yet maintaining its messages, Hasidut offers a simpler, more accessible way of unlocking its secrets. The Hasidic movement, which has prompted dramatic changes in the outlook of the Jєωιѕн people, began in the late 18th century with the teachings of Rabbi Yisrael Ba’al Shem Tov. By re-emphasizing the value of every Jєω, the Ba’al Shem Tov provided his disciples with the opportunity to link the individual closer to the Almighty. Hasidism has breathed new vitality into Jєωιѕн life, offering an alternate route to the arduous and, for some, unattainable path of study.”
http://www.steinsaltz.org/content.php?pg=Introduction&ID=65
"тαℓмυd --- The authoritative body of Jєωιѕн law and lore accuмulated over a period of seven centuries (c. 200 BCE - c. 500 CE) in Erets Israel and Babylonia." —The New Encyclopedia of Judaism, Geoffrey Wigoder, editor in Chief, New York: New York University Press, 2002, ISBN 0814793996, page 747

The Novus Ordo’s Offertory was lifted from the same Torah SheBe'al Peh ("Oral Torah" = тαℓмυd http://www.Jєωιѕнencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=113&letter=O  ) that blasphemes the Holy Family:
http://www.catholictradition.org/Eucharist/roman-mass4.htm

What God judged as “voiding the commandments of God for the traditions of men” [Mark 7:6-9]:
There are verses in the Torah that were explained away by the rabbis of the тαℓмυd as either not applying any longer, never applying or they get made so complex to enact that they eventually fall away.

…The Torah condones the death penalty while the тαℓмυd pretty much outlaws it. [see Hoffman’s analysis] The Torah tells us to take our malcontent children to the gates of the city and if they can't be reformed by the elders, to stone them to death. The тαℓмυd tells us that never happened and never should happen. Sorry!

And, in the reverse, the Torah is pretty clear about what keeping kosher should look like, and it is pretty simple, while the rabbis of the тαℓмυd and later codes expanded the laws and made them quite complex. We have a long history of interpreting our Torah, redefining its meaning, and using very advanced and creative hermeneutical tools to either alter, or in some cases, downright change, what the original meaning seems to have been. We have the principle of PARDES, which is a rabbinic literary invention, whereby each word of the Torah has four levels of interpretation: the literal meaning, peshat, a more subtle or hinting reading, remez, a creative commentary, drash, and a totally hidden or mysterious meaning, sod. Through this technique, and many others, commentators, most famously Rashi, 11th century in France, have sometimes completely changed the text from what it literally says.
“The Torah, The Constitution, and the 4th of July” Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater, Spiritual leader, Pasadena Jєωιѕн Temple and Center, Huffington Post, July 2, 2011
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-joshua-levine-grater/the-torah-the-constitutio_b_889180.html
Analysis by Michael A. Hoffman II:
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2011/07/тαℓмυd-and-constitution.html


“ʝʊdɛօ-CHRISTIANITY”—OXYMORON AND LIE

Whether from the Judaic or the Christian perspective, "ʝʊdɛօ-Christian" is an oxymoron in the vein of "defector-believer." From the Judaic perspective, Christians are “idolaters” (and so deserve death) because Christians worship “that man” (the тαℓмυdic epithet for Jesus Christ) as God, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity. From the Christian perspective Judaics, as proselytes in the line of the Pharisees, defected from the Mosaic Covenant and rejected the New Covenant, so are not faithful, but apostate. Notwithstanding smarmy flattery from Christians about “Elder Brothers” and notwithstanding the rabbis retailing their authority by “Noahide Laws,” the pretense of continuity is a lie.  Recall that, as freely stipulated by the rabbis, Judaism is a post-Christian religion, a reaction against Christianity.

“The thesis of this book is that Judaism and Christianity do not form a common tradition, ‘the ʝʊdɛօ-Christian tradition.’ They are not compatible ... only now, for reasons of politics and sociology, have some representatives of Judaism maintained otherwise....”
Jєωs and Christians: the myth of a common tradition, Rabbi Jacob Neusner, ISBN 1-586841-08-4, Binghamton NY: Classics in Judaic Syudies
http://books.google.no/books?id=qDdoHV9sPsAC&lpg=PP1&dq=Jєωs%20and%20Christians%3A%20the%20myth%20of%20a%20common%20tradition&hl=no&pg=PR11#v=onepage&q&f=false
See also: Don Curzio Nitoglia: The "ʝʊdɛօ -Christian" Lie
http://www.doncurzionitoglia.com/menzogna_del_giudeocristianesimo.htm
Google translate: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doncurzionitoglia.com%2Fmenzogna_del_giudeocristianesimo.htm
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/11/don-curzio-nitoglia-ʝʊdɛօ-christian-lie.html

“The complex of rabbinically ordained practices ... including most of the rules for the treatment of Scripture itself--do not derive from Scripture at all. Rabbinic Judaism's initial concern was with the elaboration and refinement of it's own system. Attaching the system to scripture was secondary. It therefore is misleading to depict rabbinic Judaism primarily as a consequence of an exegetical process or the organic unfolding of Scripture. Rather, rabbinic Judaism began as the work of a small, ambitious, and homogeneous group of pseudo-priests ...By the third century (A.D.) the rabbis expressed their self-conception in the ideology of "oral Torah" which held that a comprehensive body of teachings and practices (halachot) not included in Scripture had been given by God and through Moses only to the rabbinic establishment.” Rabbinic Judaism: Structure and System, Rabbi Jacob Nuesner, pp. 31-34

TORAH ON ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖITY, BESTIALITY, COPROPHAGIA, & PEDOPHILIA

“Israel is not to be accused of pederasty.” Kiddushin 82a

A SALIENT EXAMPLE OF HOW THE RABBIS NULLIFY GOD'S LAW WITH THEIR ORAL TORAH

GOD'S LAW IN THE HEBREW BIBLE:

Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination."

TORAH NULLIFYING GOD'S LAW:

Sanhedrin 54b "If a boy under the age of nine perpetrated sodomy upon an adult, the adult is not liable for punishment, for the intercourse of a boy under nine years of age is not legally an act of intercourse. Since a child less than nine years old cannot commit sodomy, he can also not be the object of sodomy....This Baraita supports Rav, for it teaches that if a man engaged in ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ intercourse with a child under the age of nine, he is exempt from liability."


"…intercourse with a boy under nine years old is not considered a significant se