I'd the like the opinion of anyone here that has read
The Church of the Incarnate Word by Charles Cardinal Journet. In doing some analysis on his contention regarding universal acceptance of a pontifical election being an infallible act, and decided to read the work in its entirety. Disregarding the previous, parts of it, especially his exposition on his own view of invincible ignorance seems to me to smack of modernism. I've heard that he exerted some influence during the Apostate Council, and that he was a supporter of both
Dignitatis humanae and
Lumen gentium. If that's so, then I would posit that his understanding of ecclesiology must at the very least be somewhat suspect. Any thoughts?
Here's a link to the work, posted on EWTN:
The Church of the Incarnate WordIf this should be relocated, please do so, Matthew. I just thought I should stick to the bibliophiles.
~ John