UNDER THE BANNER, NO. 144, JULY-AUGUST 2009,
PAGES 20-31
INFILTRATIONS IN THE CHURCH
by FELIX CAUSAS
(Publish with permission of the author)

via GOOGLE TRANSLATE

Who dared to defend Rampolla? FARCE? Nonsense? or HOAX?
A renegade followers of Archbishop Lefebvre and defends the F ∴ M ∴ Rampolla.
Is it just a joke? Is it pure stupidity?
Either they are sedevacantists Italian to join the camp-Tanoüarn Celier and Co.
in argument for the lack of plot against the Church?
But you do not have to take them seriously.
In an extensive article of 35 pages entitled "The Cardinal Rampolla was he a Freemason?" Which appeared in the French edition of the Italian magazine " Sodalitium " Number 62 , Father Ricossa is not only questioned the affiliation Cardinal Rampolla's Masonic membership but also Upper-Illuminist Lucifero Masonry of the OTO.
We note at the outset that the title of the article, itself, is already one in doubt that the rest of the paper will undertake to expand until the final fall!
It should be noted before entering the heart of the matter we have other things to do in a state of emergency where we are today than fighting other Catholics, even if they are not our trend! We prefer to book all our energy to fight the occult power in all its manifestations!
However, from time to time when the honor of certain persons involved with unconscious, procedures or require the enemy, and also on behalf of fraternal correction, we must not hesitate to intervene. The struggle for truth requires; the fight against the enemy too!
Regarding the case Rampolla, we have already said what we said in our previous article, the abbot Ricossa by Article dishonest he has committed, requires us to answer him point by now point, although the facts are fully called into question long-established.
Second point: according to the "reading grid" that we have given in our articles on the "Vocabulary Enemy" (SLB No. 80) and "Vocabulary monomaniac" (SLB No. 141), we were not surprised found in the article by Father Ricossa discrediting of the words whose sole purpose is to instill doubt - the Luciferian Masonic affiliation and of Cardinal Rampolla felon - in the minds of followers of the thesis Cassiciacuм (supports "Sodalitium"), supporters of their cause or their friends and readers review. Thus, from the beginning of the article, Father Ricossa launches a frontal attack on "state of the thesis," "first sounds", "Masonic initiation potential," "version which owes its capillary action (! .. .) to the many lectures and writings of the Marquis de La Franquerie in the 70 "," enriched with new elements, "" Press `traditionalist '(note the use of quotes inside).
But the abbot Ricossa attacks especially in this article in SLB, article that prompted him to write his scathing appeared in "Sodalitium" No. 62! ...
1) ASSERTIONS UNCONTROLLED AND RECKLESS ACCUSATIONS:
We must point out numerous errors of interpretation, due to a misreading of our article or express a desire to demolish the "thesis of the affiliation."
We never said our own what we wrote because we are a single Catholic basic teaching, which has never claimed to take the place of the teaching Church, which never took pen, for over twenty years now, if the authorities mandated to the fighting had done their duty! All our teachers are clerics, scholars, high intellectual integrity, many of which may be honored, even canonized, one day when the Church will be in order. We affirm nothing of ourselves. We quote simply authorities and docuмents that we have been fortunate to know and we can not fail to inform our neighbors, given their importance. We would shut us a crime. We had the grace to know: we must let others know! We are the watcher, the sentinel on the ramparts simple and we have to heart to point out the danger when we see it happen, including the dangers past that illuminate the present dangers!
Thus, we never said free all Secretaries of State of the Vatican from Pius IX, were appointed by the F ∴ M ∴ [1] We would like this about our old friend and revered master, the Marquis de The Franquerie which, remember it anyway, before the war was the right hand of Monsignor Jouin and editor-in-Chief of the RISS, which allowed him to learn a lot about the "inside information "the nature of occult powers, its acts, its tactics of infiltration ... Add the information of the Marquis were corroborated by former Jesuit Malachi Martin in his book-key "Vatican. The Treasury of Saint Peter "published in 1987 by Editions du Rocher. This voluminous work is not only a historical novel: it provides a large number of keys, the key "Secretary of State." We advise the abbot Ricossa to read particular pages 659 to 662 ... Malachi Martin had learned much in the Vatican, including the "Market" that binds the world to the Church through the Masonic Lodge ... We'll talk a little further away but it was lance the boil!
On the affiliation of the Marquis felon Rampolla had learned enough of Bishop Jouin, necessitated some caution vis-à-vis the Vatican, to have acquired an absolute certainty. Rampolla was a traitor and had made a point of termination for such an abomination from happening again, for a Luciferian is not inducted into the Chair of Peter! This shocked the editors of "Sodalitium" up to them who say that the seat is vacant!
Why this indulgence vis-à-vis Rampolla? This execrable character should be denounced. We did.
Similarly we do not slander our own Saint Pius X, Benedict XV and Pius XII that we have in high esteem, especially Saint Pius X and Pius XII. We just mentioned - and we of course agree with him - the American Heimbichner Craig, we read with pen in hand and attended by a considerable literature on the OTO, necessary for writing his book scary and cleaner on the action of the company Luciferian. He also learned a lot about the "seed" of felon Rampolla and agents he trained and then planted in the church after his eviction from the "throne of St. Peter." Its termites formed by him, have made a work of death which Vatican II is also the trace. As for those who have rubbed Rampolla, they could not avoid being contaminated by its pestilential smell ...
There is no question for us to slander the Church and its priests, to drag in the mud along the length of an article, to exceed all bounds of decency as we are accused of doing the abbot Ricossa . "A serious ffirmations slanderous" and "charge" that are responsible for the article "Sodalitium No. 62," paper prepared for severely condemn "a certain spirit of defamation and denigration of the whole Church, that s 'implies [would] Unfortunately, among some "traditionalists", messy and the good name of the real defenders of the Catholic faith against the errors of the integral modern "! ! !
One wonders if we have not seeing things by reading such things! Ricossa Father continues: "So we start our trial, recalling that already during his lifetime, Cardinal Rampolla was never tried in the courts of the Church /.../ this alleged Masonic membership: It would have been the duty of anyone who had suspicions on the matter, to denounce him to the ecclesiastical authority for violation of canon 2335, which prohibits on pain of excommunication registration for the F ∴ M ∴, with the clerks, the penalty of suspension and deprivation of any profit, office, dignity, and pension Church (canon 2336 § 1). In the absence of an ecclesiastical trial, and in total ignorance of divine judgment, it is with the arguments of the historian, are and will always remain the docuмents and these alone, we will seek to approach the truth "!
We rub your eyes after reading these lines! What emerges from this scholarly prose and pseudo moralizing as the naivety of clerics will always be as unfathomable as human stupidity! Need I remind you that membership of the felon Rampolla - reported by Cardinal Merry del Val, Bishop Marty, the Marquis of Franquerie Felix Lacointa ... - Was not known until after the death of the traitor and the general public, in the late 20's! It should be noted for those who do not know that Rampolla was Secretary of State of Pope Leo XIII, that is to say, the second character of the Church after the Pope. At this level, and given the level of education, science, personable, ..., the Princes of the Church - and we must recognize that Rampolla was of that caliber, unfortunately - it does not commit the incalculable error (for the interests of the Counter-Church) trailing of damning docuмents and other affiliate rare items for which the sect requires its adherents an absolute prudence and supervision, permanent. Yet God allowed that Rampolla make mistakes of this kind and we discover among his papers after his death, the evidence of his treachery.
How this happens exactly? Here: the death of Cardinal felon, was found on him a key which gave access to a metal cabinet where personal discoveries were evidence of the affiliation of the deceased cardinal secret societies (F ∴ M ∴, OTO, ...) sources and its harmful effect. It was in these circuмstances that the damning docuмents was brought to St. Pius X, the holy pontiff, appalled, but wanting to preserve dishonor the memory of the prelate felon, and in order to avoid a scandal, says very moved, "The unhappy! Burn! ". And papers were thrown into the fire in his presence. We will see below, in an appendix to his article, Father Ricossa brazenly deny these facts and a rabbit out of his hat, in this case the "testimony" from a reader in Switzerland. We will see what to think. Additional precision: the OTO in Zurich published a periodical entitled "Oriflamme" which reflects the membership of the Cardinal felon. It was also reported in a book exclusively for F ∴ M ∴: the "Europäische Freimaurer Kalender" for 1966, published in Germany in Baden-Baden.
The Marquis de La Franquerie had learned this information from Monsignor Jouin, Bishop Marty, in detail, and we had talked. Unfortunately, these are the tangible evidence that St. Pius X burned to preserve the memory of the felon and the Church a scandal, evidence that the abbot Ricossa would like to see on his desk that we can provide ... But there is the testimony of those who knew and we can send to the trash with a single stroke of the pen or liars (Monsignor Jouin, Marquis de La Franquerie ...). It is important also to address this serious challenge to the testimony of persons worthy of faith on the part of Father Ricossa. This is simply to accuse them of lying. Such methods are unacceptable, scandalous, especially when accompanied by their "demonstration" of devious ways, distorted evidence. And Father Ricossa cited in support of his thesis about the denatured which circulated after talks with Benedict XV, about "adulterated" which occasioned at the time of great turmoil in the political and diplomatic circles. And that's it! A little easier, is not it, but let us not take this game!
We ourselves have witnessed about amazing and we have no physical evidence to give the truth. The fact remains that these things are really past and will remain etched in our memory indelibly! "Testis united testis nullus" says the Latin adage, perhaps, but facts are facts and a single witness may have seen or heard extraordinary things without being able to furnish proof. So!
At that price you can challenge all the Masonic infiltration in the Church of default evidence, of "palpable historical docuмent" so dear to the historian! ! ! And we could conclude: my dear friends, Deo Gratias! We have great news for you: there is no Masonic infiltration in the Church! This was only a figment of the imagination, the finding of excessive and fanatical Catholics, who say without any physical evidence of the monstrosities that undermine the dignity and honor of the people! ! !
It seems that many clerics have not realized it was more of a combat rogue, accompanied by multiple low blows, even if it meant higher eminences, a battle in which the protagonists, tall sizes , do not commit the odd trailing overwhelming evidence of their claims abuses!
Father Ricossa claims there was no divine sanction! But if, reverend sir, there was a beautiful divine sanction was the election of a saint, that all "traditionalists" worship: Saint Pius X in place of the traitor Rampolla which logically should be elected. The veto of the Emperor of Austria had no reason to be serious against Rampolla if those who knew then (Monsignor Jouin) had not pressed the Emperor of Austria to intervene urgently Cardinal Puzyna! With this veto Saint Pius X was elected! Here it is Divine Punishment! ! !
We will add, as an aside, the chancery and the intelligence services must have docuмentation of the utmost importance and be aware of unknowns of mere mortals. But these diplomatic and intelligence are silent as tombs. It will also be difficult to obtain physical evidence.
2) A SET OF QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS STAGGERING ALL TRUNCATED:
Note the early objections of Father Ricossa major ambiguity for writing the body of his article as "the floor to the charge - the floor is defense." The priest presents the arguments of the prosecution, we are, and then presents the arguments of the defense of Rampolla felon who go against the thesis plots, like St. Thomas, "sed contra ... ".
What? Pardon? You said the word is to the defense?! The defense of a traitor? Are you serious, sir? You will try to defend a camouflaged enemy of our venerated Holy Roman Catholic Church, under false pretext of calumny? ! Try to defend at all costs a tool of Lucifer who nearly accomplish the objectives of the Counter-Church in 1903, the objectives of the High Sales execrable Roman so incurred by Cretineau-Joly in his "Roman Church against the Revolution"? !
So, without hesitation, you get counsel for the 'devil' Rampolla? You seem caught amnesia or despise irrefutable evidence: those of the Marquis de La Franquerie who knew the matter in detail by Bishop Marty who was also the details directly to the Secretary of State of Saint Pius X, the venerable Cardinal Merry del Val, two exceptional personalities who did everything they could to stem the rising tide of sludge generated by the Counter-Church?!
And you dare to title your objections: "The Word is the defense?" The truth upsets you does at this point that you agree to the auxiliary of the worst snakes that dropped the Counter-Church in the early twentieth century, an assault on the Citadel which you claim to be an advocate? !
You laugh at the intervention of Bishop Jouin to Austria. First, it should be noted that Jouin Bishop's friends call him "Rev." even before he founded the RISS in 1912, he directed until 1932 review and survived seven years longer, until at the beginning of the war in 1939, thanks to the care of his friends.
He was never told that Bishop Jouin intervened as director of the RISS at the Conclave of 1903, as the first issue of its journal appeared nine years later! You really take us for fools or bad accounting?
Do you know that Bishop Jouin, well before founding the RISS, following the advice Bidegain and after the case of IR, was an excellent connoisseur of the FM and he had trouble with the brethren, the time when he exercised a ministry? ! Masonry had played tricks on and he knew what to expect with the "dear brothers ..."
Heimbichner clearly states on page 16 of his book that the intervention was well in 1903 and not 1912 or later, when Monsignor Jouin headed his review! Monsignor Jouin saw the danger that was brewing in the Conclave, through its intelligence network, and through influential connections, persuaded Francis Joseph, Emperor of Austria - says Heimbichner - to invoke the right to exclude , provision of a treaty dating back to the 17th century, signed between Vienna and the Vatican, clause certainly fallen into disuse, but it achieved its goal to undermine the traitor out of Rampolla, whatever may have been the ups and downs during the Conclave , what may have been the feelings of enmity felt by the venerable cardinal when Cardinal Puzyna became the herald of an episode "no conclave correct" l. .. God had his ways were not those of the Cardinals!
Write that "Monsignor Jouin could then talk to Franz Joseph Rampolla's Masonic and Franz Joseph had no reason to prevent Rampolla for this reason" following the long deleterious influence of the pro-Masonic Josephism Austria is not a compelling argument. This is a peremptory statement free!
Furthermore, it is indeed mysterious Saint Pius X, who owed his election to the ouster of Rampolla, to be quick to remove the veto. While it is always annoying that political power interferes in the affairs of religious power and vice versa. It is also regrettable that the two powers have not met the requirements of Pope Saint Gelasius, salutary advice back to the fifth century [2] , recommending that the two powers to deal strictly with all their jurisdiction while working, in the most perfect harmony, the common good. If the requirements of Pope Saint Gelasius had been met by some and by others, we never had so many sources of discord, hatred and ruin for more than a millennium and a half!
St. Pius X abolished the veto. God allowed him to do! We note though that Rampolla was not elected and this is essential! According to the abbot Ricossa, Rampolla was excluded solely because of the political jealousies. Free to the Abbot of these arguments hold for front and especially to think that St. Pius X, after his election, has been appointed to important offices Rampolla of the Roman Curia, knowing the prelate known to be a Freemason?!
Recall again that the affiliation of the felon was top secret because it was the highest levels of the Luciferian Masonry of the OTO and not the mere masonry where the brothers are unaware of these intricacies that would make an escape many if they had knowledge. St. Pius X knew the membership of the OTO after the death of the felon and not in the Conclave of 1903 or shortly after the Conclave! Should still repeat, write black on white or put in bold? !
We are confident that Rampolla took the most extraordinary precautions is not known for his involvement in the highest levels of occult powers. The argument in defense of Father Ricossa does not!
One can even consider, if you push a certain logic to the end, that Rampolla decided to retain all evidence of membership in its metal cabinet for the Vatican authorities discovered well - thanks to its "key" that He carried with him - the terrible docuмents, after his death. A bomb in a way, that the Pontiff and his close associates in a cold sweat feel and understand how far the enemy had reached the level of infiltration ... [3]
In the "Second and Third Argument," in Note 39, the abbot Ricossa reproach us to accuse St. Pius X have burned the evidence of the forfeiture of Rampolla. We would have been disrespectful towards the Saint Pius X. If Father had Ricossa read our comments would have noted that we do not blame directly Saint Pius X, for which we have the greatest veneration. We regret, however, that this venerable pontiff did not go through when you know its relentless struggle against the cult modernist! It was never our intention to discredit Saint Pius X, implicitly denying his holiness or whatever else! These charges are outrageous and do not reflect our thoughts. Even saints have their moments of weakness and love for the Church to that of black abyss sometimes they fall back, not daring to give the enemy a pretext to savor its progress or make fun of the disorder generated by its exactions !
St. Pius X would not it have been pointing the projector without worrying about "what people will say we"? The defenders of the citadel Catholic would probably understood his message ...
Father Ricossa once again instills doubt about the evidence reported by Felix Lacointa in its "anti-revolutionary block" on the comments of Bishop Marty and a French priest. Doubt about the identity of the Cardinal who related in detail all the details of the case to Bishop Marty Rampolla. But the Marquis de La Franquerie assured us that this was the Cardinal Merry del Val, Secretary of State of Saint Pius X!
As for claiming that Monsignor Benigni, founder of the network anti-modernist "Sodalitium Planum", himself a great expert in masonry, never suspected of being affiliated Rampolla does not surprise us: the OTO as part of the highest circles Counter-Church, its followers were wise as the serpent! It was unforgivable that the Vatican Secretary of State is as indiscreet! ... Mgr Benigni died in 1934, hated of all modernists. The article by Felix Lacointa dated from 1929. At the Conclave of 1914 Mgr Benigni could not have known what was revealed in 1929, five years before he died, worn out by fighting without mercy.
Ricossa that Father wrote that the testimony of F. Lacointa are "impressive at first sight" part of the astonishing determination to clear the traitor Rampolla its abominable wickedness! Weird, really weird! We want to be defending the Church and its most stubbornly high, but want to defend the "devil" and his associates left us very confused!
Fourth argument: Father Ricossa wrote, "the magazine The Equinox [4] demonstrate [5] that Rampolla was part of the OTO "... The volume of the Equinox quoted by the Marquis of Franquerie, following Felix Lacointa [6] does exist and thanks to the kindness of a friend we have docuмented extremely consult the pages in question, and see with our eyes, the names of the characters mentioned, members of the OTO, which Cardinal Rampolla ...
As for writing a review like that of the OTO, reserved for its members Luciferian, was at auction - a moment suppose that's true ... - There was very little likelihood that the general public, including Catholics, are aware of the existence of such publications, and even if they had known, it is likely they would have fled like the plague. That is to say that apart from the world of the Counter-Church, the journal of the OTO was not for the general public and not trying to attract attention to non-specialists!
Father Ricossa writing, however, that the text of the OTO presents "insurmountable inconsistencies that make the source totally unreliable"! Certainly, Father has done everything in his power to discredit to the docuмent root terribly overwhelming! We shall see. Father Ricossa pokes fun of the list of 14 names of members listed in the docuмent OTO and began a scholarly demonstration apparently intended to be sprayed and logical inconsistencies in dates and death of people that could not then be part of the OTO! ...
What would it be better studied and the Counter-Church was not formed by the friends of Christ the King Vaquié Jean and the Marquis de La Franquerie! He then realized that the figures cited by the OTO, they have certainly lived before the founding of the OTO, were all part of the line of Cain as a Luciferian ... The famous offspring of the devil that has continued from century to century as a result of Cain, the first luciferian!
There is not the enemy as to be able to recognize those in his camp: "his own"! This aspect of the struggle of two cities has completely escaped the abbot Ricossa and the list of 54 names given by the OTO is not as laughable or ridiculous that would have us believe the abbot Ricossa. That the OTO had mentioned Moses, Charlemagne, St. Hippolyte, Alexander VI (Borgia) is not surprising: the Counter-Church appreciates those who have walked a while with her (or Antipope Pope astray) because certain behaviors cause many souls on the way to damnation, a major objective of the forces of Hell! We have repeated it many times in our articles SLB: damnation of the majority!
As Moses was it not raised at the court of Pharaoh, typically demonic kingdom [7] ? But Moses followed God's ways.
Charlemagne, far from being a member of the lineage of Cain was the emperor of an empire that was already in his time a form of supranational government. These embryos can always universal interest in the occult power assassins who aspire to continually retrieve the buildings oriented in the Divine Plan of Creation to divert and use their Slaver Plan for world domination. Counter-Church of the OTO should have other subversive intentions by getting Charlemagne to his advantage while this remarkable man will never come to terms with the forces of the devil. But we humbly recognize that we are not in the good books of the OTO to be aware of all its secrets ...
However Rampolla was not recovered and his case is quite different since the demolition work that opera is palpable enough to notice that the Rally he encouraged all his influence was one of the largest disaster that the Church had to suffer in that time disturbed ...
Fifth argument: "the record of Bishop Jouin, quoted by the Marquis de La Franquerie." Wretched claws begin this fifth point of the "rebuttal" Father delights in meanness on the title of nobility of our old friend and called simply "Andre Le Sage." Yes, but Andre Le Sage's Franquerie. No matter, after all, because very few men in the twentieth century have kept the torch of divine right of kings, authentic legitimate! Where were the other nobles in the battle between all important? ... We are part of those who think that the Great Monarch will keep the nobles who fought in the right direction but will recreate a new nobility more committed to defending the rights of God, protect the widow and the orphan, attaché to defend its particles, or privileges to disperse rallies, parties and other social events quite futile!
The Marquis de La Franquerie was that caliber of brave men who worked all his life only for the rights of God and the defense of the One Truth that saves! She was not aware of any meanness. Father Ricossa can be said, given its processes? ! ...
In this fifth point, Father Ricossa Seeks to issue the existence of the file Rampolla release, Among Others, members of the episcopate "safe" Through the Marquis de La Franquerie. Recall our friend That Was in Some affiliation with the Cardinal Felon Sects-through confidences made by Cardinal Merry del Val, Secretary of State of Saint Pius X, Marty Bishop, bishop of Montauban and Other sources of information. This Was Not Intended file intended for publication Must Be Communicated to persons in positions of Responsibility, to inform and warn 'em about the tactics of the enemy, subtle tactics That Could Lead, if we don' Will not take care, to place one of the MOST enterprising aCCoMpliCes on the Throne of St. Peter ... Extremely serious event That Almost Happened at the time (and May Have Happened sincere!). The record was not just made up articles of Felix Lacointa, but detailed descriptions of Monsignor Jouin, Cardinal Merry del Val, Bishop Marty and other politico-religious docuмents collated on the felon, according to what we were able to learn.

The information for "VIP" is not the same as that communicated to the public. Some people need to know quality! In this connection it is useful to open a parenthesis in line with what we just wrote. Father Ricossa seems to ignore or pretend to ignore that the Marquis de La Franquerie - fount of knowledge in a number of areas, including knowledge of the Counter-Church, the defense of the French monarchy and the Roman Catholic Church - was chosen for these reasons serve as Secret Chamberlain of Pius XII, in particular. A Secret Chamberlain is an intelligence agent of a Pontiff, agent a lot about very specific questions. The Marquis de La Franquerie and handed to the Pope or the Bishops 'safe' files very well done on the topics we discussed. He would have them hand delivered by friends when he was not safe in Rome (war, urgency of the moment ...) because he was wary of certain personalities in the entourage of the Pope ... These records were thus designed to the highest members of the Church teachers were not formed, as can be expected, just newspaper clippings or shorthand "pavement radio"! ... But the priest did not know probably Ricossa and has therefore allowed to question the testimony of our friend and skills for which "Rome" had appointed Chamberlain Secret!

Folder "Rampolla" Was no exception to the rule of high seriousness and competence That made the reputation of the Marquis de La Franquerie to Italy! In our case, unlike the Abbot Ricossa who, before a scratch although firmly told not hesitate to make a brush polishing, we do not question the credibility of the Marquis de La Franquerie [8] the reliability of his witnesses and his critical sense in the sort of sources. Broken to work as a historian, having Political Science and Ecole du Louvre we knew his honesty!

As to denigrate the "Davidic descent" [9] the Kings of France, the coming of the Holy Pope and the Grand Monarque is making a bad case of intent. There are enough old docuмents on these issues to cut short any villainy. The Blessed Virgin at La Salette, in his Secret - is not it Mr. Abbot Ricossa, great enemy of Secret [10] - deals with the restoration of Christian society and the Church under the combined action of these non-standard characters which we expect the arrival with great impatience ...

And the Abbot of engaging in digressions on the sources cited by the Marquis, which were extracted elements that supported the "thesis" of the Holy Pope and the Grand Monarque. It is certain that Nostradamus or Jean-Fernand Crombette Gaston Bardet were never the Fathers of the Church, and that even if one must be extremely careful with their work, sometimes there are pearls you need to know to sort n 'retain what is good, according to the counsel of the apostle Saint Paul! We agree that these characters are "limited" and that the area of prophecy requires a cool head! But here too the argument of Father Ricossa does not: Would it have forgotten the pagan oracles who foretold the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Similarly there are prophecies in Islamic countries and among Protestants: the case of seeing Nordic Anton Johanson and his visions for the punishment of the Western nations is rather surprising. All this joined the conventional Catholic prophecies concerning these events. Should they discard so far? ! Experience and remember what is good is said! ...

Venerable Bartholomew Holzhauser as to, we can not accept the analysis of Father mocking Ricossa! Put on the record straight: it's not a comment but one interpretation, which is quite different! The "Little Bollandists" Bishop Guerin have this formula that the excellent interpretation of Holzhauser shows all the other work that has been made on this fundamental prophetic text as "child's play." Also, be aware that when the Venerable wrote his interpretation he had the hand as "guided" and could not go beyond chapter XV, verse 4, ie the verses which speaks of the Antichrist and after. The translator has thought it allowed to continue until the end but its interpretation has nothing to do with that Holzhauser. The venerable has mentioned the date 1855 as date of birth of the Antichrist is not surprising. God has postponed punishment many times, according to the indications of the mystics and prayers of various "lightning" get time. There's really nothing to guffaw over a simple "mistake" to date, and take the opportunity to throw and the author and his work in the trash! This tactic is now much too well known to let it take ...

Having known the Marquis, a great defender of the Church and the King, and read from the pen of Father Ricossa that this man of integrity "had an excessive passion for the bizarre, the unusual and even the esoteric" (! ) has literally shocked. Such a statement is outright grotesque. The Marquis fought all these notions of his life, how could he have a passion for those around? ! ...

Sixth and final argument: the policy of Cardinal Rampolla and his "school". Having written in our article on the felon Rampolla that "since Pius IX virtually all Secretaries of State are members of the Lodge under a requirement of the Counter-Church" has been the major factor that has Father Ricossa decided to write his article in "Sodalitium"! Because of these few lines the priest wrote, "this time it is no longer only of Cardinal Rampolla, but of the Catholic Church"! Father knows he read or did he learn to read with the "global method"? ! We say only a few exceptions, nearly all the Secretaries of State were affiliated. We want the old Jesuit Malachi Martin, who was the translator Conclaves [11], high-flying specialist also reported that these claims in his book "Vatican, the Treasury of St. Peter" and we have said. The P. Malachi Martin was aware of a large number of cases, including the Vatican Masonic infiltration. His testimony is especially important if the enemy managed to win over the second infernal characters Vatican this indicates that our time sees the demonic power more than tenfold. We made simply finding disillusioned. Lists of church members to the Lodge, such as those provided by Mino Pecorelli (formerly of P2, then murdered because of his revelations !...), by Don Luigi Villa and others, we have reproduced and supplemented by the famous Masonic record of the French episcopate in 1938 [12] they also hinder the abbot Ricossa? We also, contrary to what the priest might think, shall defend the Church, but the manner of St. Catherine of Siena, shouting the truth from the rooftops with a hundred thousand languages, even those who do not want the hearing or who find the means employed are not "correct"! ... We intend to alert the Masonic infiltration of Catholic undermining the Church, like it or not! We consider it a crime not to give warning when danger is urgent or approach stealthily. If the abbot Ricossa take offense, he abandoned the struggle that he goes over and play ball!

The Rally, though think the priest was a terrible mistake, we are still paying for today. Who could recommend this obvious error if the men of the sect by sect or manipulated? In the end, the Rally he benefited the church or the Enemy? We await the answer of the abbot Ricossa should know this maxim of the Gospel of judging a tree by its fruits? ...

As to write that "the monarchy is certainly the best form of government but not the only and the submission to the constituted government is present in the practice and teaching of the Church since the dawn of Christianity," we can not - in the face of assertions as criticism - that to oppose the recommendations of Pope Saint Gelasius which called everyone to stay within its sphere of competence and to refrain from interfering while working for the common good, under the gaze of God!

And that until the Revolution, because from this terrible fracture, the Pact of Reims, the year of our Lord 496, was broken by Lucifer who would impose his new form of government anti-Christian Demo (n) Republican democracy that has nothing to do with the republics that existed before the Revolution!

We addressed these fundamental questions many times in SLB, and noted that since the year of disgrace 1789 everything is distorted by "reducing groups and leaders nuclei" [13] that infect the whole pyramid and monopolize power in the knowledge of the people who naively imagines the opportunity to choose their leaders ...

Do we still need to remind the abbot Ricossa the abominable 'Catechisms' of the Napoleonic era where there was the odious Corsican Illuminati and F ∴ M ∴ a kind of fourth person of the Holy Trinity? ! ...

Leo XIII has published a number of anti-Masonic texts, we are delighted, especially for the great encyclical "Humanum Genus." And we appreciate that Rampolla was not Secretary of State at the time of the encyclical appeared as it would surely make every effort to ensure that this text does not appear. The occult powers which had the mandate to operate its undermining inside the church would have been offended that Rampolla his signature at the bottom of the papal encyclical ...

Incidentally, the photograph of Aleister Crowley (?), On page 29 of "Sodalitium" is rather a misnomer: it is simply ridiculous. It would have been a thousand times better to choose a picture "cold" as the portrait reproduced by Craig Heimbichner in his book, which shows all decked Crowley Masonic rags, photography we have reproduced in our article on the "felon Rampolla ". A picture of a clown might as well have illustrated on page 29 of "Sodalitium" "! It is all pathetic. Let's slip on this odd and hilarious Abbot Ricossa. Unless the librarian does is wrong? Or ...? There is another more disturbing possibility that one, who will join the conclusion of our article by posting a picture so horribly ridiculous that Crowley must surely have several bottles of whiskey (or doses cam) "in the nose" - no, but look again its thrombin on page 29 of "Sodalitium"! - Father Ricossa was behind the head for an even more subversive than you think: to get the OTO for a sect of charlatans, crackpots that has nothing to do with the higher mysteries of the Counter- Church! When you contemplate this sad clown Crowley on page 29, do you think the OTO can be considered as a coterie of Luciferians, one of the highest centers of the Counter-Church of the Devil? ! Come, let's be serious, this sect is not as dangerous as the villains "paranoid" we want to believe! And dear Cardinal Rampolla would misled with this bunch of clowns? You do not think!

Is this an underhanded tactic of Father Ricossa by publishing the wretched portrait? Have we raised a new rabbit? We ask the question!

As for writing about the Cardinal Gasparri, the trend clearly internationalist, and considered by some experts to be affiliated with the Lodge that "some rumors of masons ran over him," this is not enough to Father, he writes that if "[Gasparri] was a mason, he would have had no qualms to kill the anti-Masonic press, which has been put to death the [network] Sodalitium Pianum [Mgr Benigni] and the entire Catholic press while Bishop and Jouin the RISS could enjoy the full support of Benedict XV and Cardinal Gasparri in the fight against the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry. " Big deal! That clerics are naive and desperate to apologize when it comes to justifying the policy of the Rally of the Vatican authorities. While Benedict XV, in the continuity of Saint Pius X, has supported the work of Monsignor Jouin but we can say without fear of error, that the heart was not! As Gasparri, his Secretary of State, he applied the instructions of the "Royal Art" Masonic and on this occasion apparently supported the struggle of Monsignor Jouin antimasonic while continuing his double game! Internationalist preferences clearly show which way he leaned ...

Conclusion of the abbot Ricossa at the end of his article: "These be enough to make you think of a Masonic affiliation and what is more Luciferian, for Rampolla [and members of his" school "]? In my opinion absolutely not "!

The devil's advocate, who has spent his whole article to try to clear the traitor Rampolla to make it white as snow, ruled: Rampolla was neither a member nor a member of the sect of the OTO!

Applaud, ladies and gentlemen, the award rendered by the Court of Verrua Savoia, the award made by an abbot who has not led to fierce battle against the secret societies, like the Marquis de La Franquerie and RISS; a priest who has not had the chance to share the secrets of high officials or people who "know" and wait for it, a priest who goes to write, "not a mason so until proven otherwise "! ! !

It is well known that senior members publish all the evidence of their membership and do everything in their power to make them known, especially their enemies! It is to cry to read such nonsense! Or die laughing!

In an appendix to his article "An important point of Cardinal Rampolla," the abbot Ricossa drives the point home. An attentive reader Swiss Sodalitium hastened to send the extracted accuracy of the "Journal" of the historian of the Popes, Ludwig Pastor, in which he discusses the matches Rampolla discovered after his death ...

We see on the next bad move: Father Ricossa triumphantly concluded that there was a shift ... (yes!), about a travesty of St. Pius X! ... Certainly, these poor human beings have the faulty memory compared to men of antiquity who cultivated to excess! What a mistake on their part to give full credit to stop the rumor, this terrible and pervasive rumor! ...

Let us examine this charming precision! You see, the papers found in Rampolla did not concern his Masonic affiliations but his correspondence with his friends modernists! ! ! Again, hats off, Monsieur l'Abbe, you are really no stone unturned. You spend without counting the exclusive benefit of Rampolla felon! What a touching solicitude!

The only problem is that the Cardinal Merry del Val and Bishop Marty were formal: the papers of the metal cabinet membership, affecting many of the traitor! The Marquis de La Franquerie knew what it was! But perhaps the testimony of the second character of the Church and a member of the Church teaching is not sufficient to Father Ricossa? Write what he wrote in "Sodalitium No. 62" is simply to treat them liars, `experts' in the fabrication and distortion, followers of the rumor, or simply low of mind or idiots because they are stupid enough to confuse modernism and Masonic affiliation? ! While the abbot Ricossa himself is adequately trained, informed, enlightened not to let it count, not to be surprised by some nasty rumors about warped by evil that took off in 20 years and continue to disturb the spirits ever since! And, 'Best of' by wanting to prove too much for its systematic questioning, you end up getting the opposite of what we were looking eagerly (= money pure and simple, of course) by publishing the Appendix (unfortunate) Father Ricossa he realized that the argument based on the hat of a magician (Switzerland), as the rabbit circuses, is null and void? Indeed, St. Pius X said it would about the felon Rampolla, and vulgar modernist compromise with the party [14]: "the poor, burn! ". These words convey a sense of extreme compassion we show that the docuмentary evidence was found of exceptional gravity! ... Too bad, Father, your rabbit Switzerland falls into the water!

After reading the article as "docuмented" in appearance, but also along this insipid No. 62 we were shocked! The F ∴ M ∴ and especially the OTO may be more than satisfied with the outcome. One of their members would not have done better.

Since the publication of our article on felon Rampolla, a few years ago, no reaction of the Counter-Church and some quarters of the French National Right, highly infiltrated [15], had not manifested. Absolute radio silence as it is the rule when addressing matters as unwelcome nuisance to the interests of occult powers.

We must acknowledge, you will agree, and we bowed up, the article by Father Ricossa, who, under pretext of defending the Church and act as devil's advocate - he has so held - was just the Devil's Advocate! There are beautifully played the role of "carrier bags" [16] and we mean no insult [17] Abbot Ricossa. We note simply, we are sorry to have to withdraw from its role in this highly subversive lamentable case.

No doubt that the OTO had to cut a bottle of champagne after reading his article! One can even assume that the release of his next book, on the OTO member will "honor" or "honorary doctor" ...

All this is deeply distressing: a renegade priest of the SSPX has decided to clear the traitorous Cardinal Rampolla del Tindaro Luciferian does nothing less than a sham!

One can therefore wonder whether this defense is good Verrua Savoia or if the defense of the felon has not been whispered by some influence pharmacy or carefully concealed? ...

This defense is so "hénaurme" we are entitled to ask the question. All the lights have turned red, and the alarm bells start to howl louder and more so that is part Verrua centers of Catholic tradition opposed to the true message of La Salette! Enemies of the Secret of the Mother of God, the Italian priests did not hesitate to publish a few years ago, a pamphlet claiming that the secret docuмents had been condemned by the Vatican, that reading (and diffusion) was prohibited Catholic and he must be careful to study texts alarmist and catastrophic. That is to say in scarcely veiled terms that the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ is an imbalance that unwelcome humanity with texts such senseless and that the Church and its priests can not tolerate a message which condemns so vehement!

Unfortunately for the abbots, God's ways are not theirs, the Mother of God knew what she was saying, knew the most intimate nature of some "sewers" and respondent has the order at its worthy messenger (Melanie), to pass "to all his people" the message she had given the mountain of La Salette in 1846 [18].

We take this opportunity to solemnly warn the abbots of warts, due to their bias as worrisome in cases where essential to the good fight, the Hi of the Church and Society, they would do well to ponder the fate of eleven French bishops who opposed the Secret slandered and Melanie. The end was tragic or bad to them (Ginoulhiac Bishop, Bishop Fava ,...) should be encouraged to the utmost caution, paying attention to the mistakes they made and to look back on themselves before that it is too late [19]! It seems that already addresses the ax to the tree ...

Their persistence in wanting to defend indefensible causes could cost them dearly one day! When engaged in the fighting are not the Battles of God and we are trying to undermine the points of strategic defenses facing the enemy, it may have serious concerns about the fate of their will be reserved!

Finish. We do not lead to sterile polemics. We said what we say in SLB No. 126. We took the pen to counter the bad article Sodalitium seemingly "objective" and searched. We will return there. The case is heard by irrefutable evidence, though the abbot Ricossa think! We leave this matter now in the hands of God ...

But before closing this article we will allow us to refresh the memory of Father Ricossa, who claims quite wrongly disciple of Bishop Guerard des Lauriers, because the abbot seems to suffer from a curious amnesia. In a number of "Cahiers de Cassiciacuм", published in May 1979, is attached to a long article from the Father Guerard des Lauriers, a letter from a very informed man, now deceased: Marco Winckler, we have already contained in SLB due to its importance. We are committed to put in front of our readers the crucial testimony of Marco Winckler on "Lobby Rampolla" because this honest man had learned a lot in Rome from 1944-1945, the action of the Luciferian felon Rampolla and his seed, very active at the time, network who wanted above all to avenge the affront of 1903 ...

In this appendix we reproduce again below, Mr. Winckler reported memories 30 years old at the time, now 60, what he had heard at the Court Vatican. They spoke twenty years before his election to a Monsignor Montini, the clan-elected lobby Rampolla who ascended the throne of St. Peter, the second foal succeed where the master had failed in the early twentieth century!. ..

As you can see the enemy of the result in ideas and perseverance is really hell! Marco Winckler received at the time of confidences of the lobby, saw that he was still active and wanted revenge because the enemy never gives up!

The network had not disarmed demonic despite the veto of Austria and the failure of a coup! In his testimony, Marco Winckler speaks of confidence that made him a Bishop Pignedoli ... whose names appear thirty years later on the lists published in Italy clerics affiliated with the F ∴ M ∴! ... But pranksters (?) As Ricossa will still continue to say we have no physical evidence of rumors too crazy, is not it? ...

So, Father!

"I beseech you therefore before God and Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead in His glorious coming, and the establishment of His kingdom, to speak the word. Press the men in season and out, take, beg, threaten, exhort with complete patience and desire to teach. " II Timothy IV, 1-2

On the feast of Saint Bonaventure, Doctor of the Church

ANNEX

THE STORY OF MARCO WINCKLER

"The fortunes of war had brought me to Italy after various adventures and misadventures with several arrests by the Germans, especially after a newspaper article, published in 1942, who appointed me as a Jєω. And this is a Catholic first put at bay, and all sorts of caresses and honors when the wheel had finally turned. She began to turn in for me in the spiritual joy, until she turned evil.

"Enjoying the great privilege at the time of the Post for the Armies, which allowed to route to France and vice versa correspondence of many Monsignor, Reverend and Reverend of any color (suit) residing in Rome, I ' had met many people and learned many things, because the Papal Court was still a court. Midway between East and West, between yesterday and tomorrow, it was full of relics and flavors that knows more since the Heads of State are people clad in ten kinds of armed police, and transported at breakneck speed in a kind of armored trains catafalques.

"Officer of Italian interpreter, I worked for common tasks in Staffs. I still had the hobby. Because probably all of the above, I was invited to the first postwar meeting of the principal figures of the Jєωιѕн community of Rome. It talks including ways to end anti-Semitism. Word got out among the Catholics of Jєωιѕн origin who worked in the Special Secretariat of the Vatican (a type of financial department). They wanted to know me. We made friends. At meetings organized by the Association of University graduates, they held to introduce myself to the chaplain of the association.

"It was Monsignor Montini, then Substitute the Secretary of State.

"My new friends had made me an enthusiastic portrait, adding:" It's one of us. " Who can understand. I keep a memory of the masses and blinded those homilies, in the extraordinary baroque chapel of the Sapienza, a chapel for fairy tales, where the assembly created a kind of warm atmosphere and as a result significantly, without my know what to attribute it. I want to have retained no recollection of any specific passage of these sermons, it was sparkling, there were words that played like a high light in stained glass.

"We were happy and he too. Moreover, the mode was eloquence. The reigning Pope had unwittingly imposed its style and everyone was trying to be slim, to be ascetic, mystical being, to have long hands (I do not know if you went to sleep on the floor). In his office, Monsignor Montini was active, direct and precise. He wished that I push in Paris, to create an association similar to his. Graduates of Paris did not need me as to show students they knew in 1968 what they are capable of when fully impregnated and heated to the point.

"The lobby was thought at the beginning of the century pull it off with Cardinal Rampolla [20], that is to say, raise one of their own at the top of the church to reshape his own image, this group pressure had not disarmed. And the hope of victory was all the more vivid, the impatience even greater, that circuмstances had played in its favor since the death of Pope Pius X. The revolution had established his power on a prodigious financial system, the "victory of democracy," a fortified Soviet empire, the world of new ways of propaganda and pressure, and discredit, because of the collapse Hitler anything that looked like anti, and in the Church, the fear for many bishops, religious and secular, to go to the vanquished or retarded.

"I still remember the distinctions made by Pius XII in his Christmas speech in 1944 about the word" democracy. " This, as they say, did not pass the ramp. And I remember the confidence of Cardinal Suhard sorry that had followed the advice of the Nuncio to join the Vichy government, including the "legitimacy" was not recognized by that of France "Free". The good Cardinal did not recover from failed handshake. As for the Cardinal Tisserant, he pondered what became, at the Council, the starting point of the decree on religious freedom.
"But who, however, has long prepared the possibility of such an election which made possible the following? It is easy to answer, but please register it is dangerous to venture into this field. I fully understand the cautious attitude of those who prefer to believe that the Holy Spirit who has himself expressed his choice. Perhaps had he shown otherwise may not have we not taken into account, only God could tell us because the Cardinals, it seems, committed to secrecy ...

"However, since the arrival of Jacques Maritain as ambassador to the Holy See, stupid and malicious gift of Georges Bidault, had ceased to serve Mass at Monsignor Montini. Because in this situation, members of the association does generate more to assert their progressivism. My friends, let us say, were frankly modernist. Maritain had invaded the group Montini, and there were only for integral humanism. I fled.

"But since it is a testimony that you ask me, I say that there was in Rome exactly what you want to know, and you will allow me to call the lobby montinien, or group Rampolla, and that an asset Monseigneur, with strong interpersonal skills, I often met and for whom I had a sincere friendship, learning that I had been presented to Monsignor Montini, I admired him and had the air of follow him, believe me probably mature enough to take a decisive step in the way of efficiency.

"I remember the mysterious tone he took - Bishop Pignedoli is to him that it is - to tell me about the great revenge was being prepared. I told the story through the veto of Austria, the result for him was to plunge the Church for half a century in the darkness and isolation of the Middle Ages, he insisted on need for openness and adaptation of the Church, and finally he gave me a glimpse of a new era, and very soon, and with great success, thanks to those who succeed where Cardinal Rampolla had the misfortune of to fail.

"I looked at him with wide eyes. He thought it meant, "But who is it? "He replied without a parable:" You use it the Mass every Thursday. "

"I confess that I must have looked silly, and I was, because I was a hundred leagues from suspecting what was expected of me for the success of Montini, the new desired time and the hills Nations (UN).

"It was, however, that I regain my senses. It was serious. The friendly Bishop Pignedoli was very intimate with Montini, since followed him in his "honorable" separation in Milan and is currently responsible for Cardinal delicate missions (such as to engage Catholics in Vietnam to receive the honor of God and peace Communist troops Viet Cong).

"We were 2 January 1945, the night fell, there was a reception at the venerable Prince E. Rampolla of Naples, and my dear lord made me invite. It was in an opulent palace, style 1880, and the rooms were bright, gleaming chandeliers, guests, guests ease breathing, the scent of young girls and women, the smell of alcohol, cigarettes blondes the whole atmosphere that is both sumptuous and worldly Papalini of me changed, the patricians who, since the capture of Rome, had condemned the main gate of their palace in protest, and therefore no longer enjoyed the favors of the House Savoie.

"You know, my dear Father, I did not respond to the advances of" Venerable "prince who was virtually the smoke and mirrors of the famous lobby (again," you understand me "). I thought, coming out of this reception, as part of a small Italian book I read in my childhood: "The great di piu cose him" (things that are beyond) and I thought even more of the famous Santo Fogazzaro ...

"No doubt there was, will there still characters in a particular caliber, capable in spite of tears and blood, saying," I'll see ... "And" I will make sure that ... "but push the deceit to the degree of perfection which we see today, this is the mystery of iniquity, the mystery so powerful that it will go blind and deaf to even the best , not to mention the "holy" priests disciples of Saint Timor ... They have, for example, never heard of the disease and the strange death of Pius XII, and when given the evidence, they are quick to reject them or to silence. They are silent in the church, the good doggies dumb.

Fortunately, there are still some "Domini canes"! "

On February 11, 1977

Marco Winckler.


[1] Page 13 of article Sodalitium.

[2] See the light of Bishop Delassus book, "The Posthumous Mission of Saint Joan of Arc," p. 178 (Esja or CFO)

[3] This is a possibility. Maybe death surprised him before he had time to take the precautions usually take the agents of the occult power, wise as the serpent.

[4] Official Organ of the OTO.

[5] Note that the conditional instills doubt and questions.

[6] Note that the Marquis knew E. Lacointa since he wrote in his review of numerous articles, some of which were grouped into volume (pre-war).

[7] is notoriously esoteric he not written a book on "Sacred Kingship: Pharaoh of the most Christian king"? ! This must be done: to associate evil Egyptian royalty to the French monarchy very Christian, after the pact year 496! ... How far does the aberrations are not they in the Bible, while Egypt has always been associated with the Devil! ...

[8] Now that he's been dead for over fifteen years! Indeed, it is very convenient not to have in front of you an opponent informed that the allegations would undermine treacherous ...

[9] Yet a few years ago cited the "Cardinal" Lustiger, in the edition of Esja (!) In New York at a meeting with Ecuмenical "Masters of the World" for a prize. .. The real decision makers are aware of everything and know a lot in genealogy & ancestry!

[10] See below, where we expose the shocking aspect of the "Cult of Half Pope!" ... We give the reason for the name 'strange' ...

[11] 14 Practicing language skills were widely used during conclaves. Posted to the Vatican for many years, Malachi Martin had learned a lot about certain scenes ...

[12] See our article in SLB No. 134: "The Masonic Infiltration of the Church."

[13] Consider again the work of Adrian Loubier with the same title because you can not understand anything in politics after the Revolution without the key leaders of the nuclei and reduction systems they have put in place throughout society and work down from the natural order. How many are wasting their time and money unnecessarily for not wanting to recognize the reality of this abominable machinery or simply because they do not. The time is too serious to waste its energy in fighting free tomorrow: when will they understand some people? !

[14] Although modernism is the "sewer of all heresies." Belonging to cults of the Counter-Church was much more serious!

[15] See the brochure for Henry Coston, disillusioned, published ten years ago "enemy infiltration in the National People's Right" (July 1999) to Henry Coston Publications.

[16] For the younger, who have not experienced the period of French Algeria, this meant all traitors so-called French, who helped the FLN of cutthroats (finance, weapons, false docuмents, etc... ..). It was mostly the cream of the socialist-communist and all professionals of the Anti-France too happy to participate in this dirty job where compatriots often found a horrible death ...

[17] The insult is the last argument of those who do not or no longer have. This pathetic little game does not interest us.

[18] We refer our friends to the thesis much more important - that the Italian brochure spiteful - of Father Michel Corteville "The New Great Shepherds of La Salette" (2 volumes, 1100 pages, in "L'Impartial "12 avenue du Grain d'Or, 49600 Beaupréau) to counteract the venom of Italy!

[19] See the brochure of Arnaud de Lassus, "Our Lady of La Saiette. The 150th anniversary of the apparition "(reprint No. 125, June 1996 to the AFS, 31 rue Rennequin, 75017 Paris).

[20] Let there be no mistake in reading the testimony of Mr. Winckler. The Lobby Rampolla was not just a lobby moderno-progressive. There was the Archangel fallen behind all these people. A close friend of Winckler assured us that the author you read the testimony was fully aware of "L'Affaire Rampolla," subject to the two articles. He also learned all the menu, in Rome, 1944-45 ... In addition, two elected lobby Rampolla, Roncalli and Montini have been beautifully pinned by Don Luigi Villa in his works, we hear pinned under the Masonic term. See "Paolo VI beato? "(Including the Masonic symbols on the tombstone of the family Montini)," Paolo VI, processo a Dad? "" The 'Chiesa Nuova' di Paolo VI "and" Reed `Beato Giovanni XXIII '? "(Civilta Publishing, 121 Via G. Galilei, 25123 Brescia, Italy) that addresses the issue well and Masonic ties of the two pontiffs with the Lodge and the representatives of the masonry! ...