Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Noel Barbara (RIP) on Salvation  (Read 2489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Clemens Maria

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2246
  • Reputation: +1484/-605
  • Gender: Male
Fr. Noel Barbara (RIP) on Salvation
« on: December 12, 2014, 10:13:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 3eme trimestre 1991                          ISSN 0750-2494
                                 FORTES IN FIDE
                                    Number 9

                           [Insert graphic "icon.tif"]

                         THE SALVATION OF NON-CATHOLICS

                OBEDIENCE IS THE BEST OF ALL POSSIBLE SACRIFICES

                          a review of Catholic teaching

                                  *-----*-----*

                        Printed Form-to-ASCII Conversion
                                       by
                                jmcnally@fred.net
                         (http://www.fred.net/jmcnally)

                                  *-----*-----*

                                    CONTENTS

                   THE SALVATION OF THOSE OUTSIDE THE CHURCH
                              What is the Church?
                             Salvation is from God
             The Necessary Conditions which must be fulfilled for
              non-Catholics to belong to the Soul of the Church.
                  A Catholic Response to the Question Raised
               The Necessity of Submitting to the Magisterium in
                        order to Avoid Losing One's Way
                                       
                 OBEDIENCE IS OF GREATER VALUE THAN SACRIFICE.
              Appendix: Listing the public activities of Pius XII
                          With regard to Sacred Music
                                       
                                CORRESPONDENCE

                                 *-----*-----*

              THE SALVATION OF THOSE OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

         "There is only one universal Church, outside of which
    absolutely no one can be saved."  Gregory XVI gave enunciation
    to this dogma which is "one of the most important and most
    clearly enunciated" teachings of our religion.

         How are we to understand his words?

         As they were meant to be understood by the Apostles, the,
    Apostolic Fathers and all the Doctors.  The word of God can
    never change.  As our Master said, "The sky and the earth will
    pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Mark XIII:31).

         Whosoever wishes to be faithful to the Lord should
    "absolutely reject the heretical supposition that dogmas
    evolve, as a result of which their meaning can change and
    become different from that which the Church first imparted to
    them" ("Antimodernist Oath", Denzinger 2145,4).

         Such being the case, the Church today, as she has always
    done, clearly teaches that outside of her, no one can be saved.

         In the face of this, must one believe that everyone,
    without exception, who does not OFFICIALLY belong to the Church
    by means of the reception of Baptism and the public profession
    of the Catholic faith, is damned?  Not at all.  Listen to the
    words of Pope Pius IX: "God in his sovereign bounty and mercy
    does not allow that a person who is not guilty of a voluntary
    fault should be subject to eternal punishment" (Letter "Quanto
    conficiamur").  In order to help us understand the possibility
    of salvation for "non-Catholics", I shall review the nature of
    the Church, and how, by means of her, God in His Mercy
    regenerates souls and saves them.

                               WHAT IS THE CHURCH?

         Recalling an expression used by St. Paul (Col. I:24), Pope
    Pius XII said that the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ:
    "Mystici Corporis Christi quod est Ecclesia", and, in doing so,
    confirmed the answer Joan of Arc gave to her judges when she
    said: "In my opinion the Church and Christ are one and the same
    thing."

         "The Church", said dom Grea, "is Christ Himself; the
    Church is the "fullness" and the achievement of Christ, "His
    Body" and his true and mystical growth: The Church which is His
    Body, and the fullness of him who is filled all in all (Eph.
    I:22-23).  And so it is that the Church occupies among the
    works of God the very place of Christ.  Christ and the Church
    are one and the same work of God" ("L'Eglise et sa constitution
    divine", p. 18).

         Surely it is clear from this that there can only be one
    institution which is the authentic Church of Christ.

         HOW ARE WE TO RECOGNIZE THE CHURCH?

         Foreseeing that innumerable Churches would claim to be
    this unique institution, Christ took great pains to delineate
    the nature of His Church and to distinguish it from all the
    others.  He did this at Caesarea Philippi.  After having told
    Simon bar Jona that he was Peter, Jesus declared "upon this
    rock I will build my Church" (Matt. XVI:18).  The Master did
    not say "a Church", but "MY Church".  This possessive adjective
    makes it abundantly clear that of all the religious societies
    which claim to belong to Him, only the Roman Catholic Church,
    which is built upon the rock of Peter, is the authentic Church
    of Christ; the others, which reject this rock, cannot be such.
    The dogma in question must therefore be understood in this
    manner: "Outside of the Roman Catholic Church, absolutely no
    one will be saved".[1]

         The Mystical Body of Christ, the true Church, participates
    in the mystery of the Incarnation.  Just as her Head, that is
    Jesus Christ, is both true Man and true God, so also the
    Catholic Church is at one and the same time both human and
    divine, a material and a spiritual entity.

         THE BODY OF THE CHURCH, that which renders her visible and
    constitutes as it were "a flag raised over the nations", is
    first of all those members of which she is composed.  Also
    pertaining to the body of the Church is the public profession
    of the faith by these members, the sensible signs by means of
    which she communicates to them the divine life, and finally,
    the entire ensemble of her rites and monuments.

         THE MEMBERS OF HER BODY are all those who have received
    the laver of regeneration or Baptism.  This is the sacrament of
    the faith which Jesus instituted in order to bring together all
    those whom the Father had called and chosen (John XV:16,
    VI:44).  As members of a visible body, they publicly profess
    the Catholic faith.

         OUTSIDE AND SEPARATED FROM THE BODY OF THE CHURCH are all
    those who have been so unfortunate as to commit the sin of
    heresy, schism or apostasy, as well as those who have been
    excluded by legitimate authority.

         THE SOUL OF THE CHURCH or her divine aspect is above all
    the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Jesus.  It is He who gives life
    to the Church, who illuminates and directs her.  It is also
    this divine life which, descending from the Head, vivifies all
    the members and binds them together.  Finally, the Soul of the
    Church consists of "the theological virtues faith, hope and
    charity, the gifts of grace from the Holy Spirit, and all the
    celestial treasures which are derived from the merits of Christ
    the Redeemer, and of the Saints" ("Catechism of Saint Pius X").

         BELONGING TO THE SOUL OF THE CHURCH are all those in whom
    the Holy Spirit dwells.  These are those who have theological
    faith, possess the divine life and are in a state of grace.
    The primary effect of the Holy Spirit in the soul is to
    sanctify it.

         While sinners have separated themselves from the Soul of
    the Church, they remain always united to her body.  Pope Pius
    XII recalled this in his encyclical "Mystici Corporis": "It is
    necessary to recognize that the infinite mercy of Our Lord
    makes it impossible for Him to refuse a place in His Mystical
    Body to those whom He had previously not refused a place at his
    banquet table (Matt. IX:11).  For no fault, not even a most
    serious sin - schism, heresy and apostasy apart - can separate
    one from the Body of the Church."

         SEPARATED FROM THE SOUL OF THE CHURCH are all those who,
    as a result of some mortal sin, are no longer in a state of
    grace.  They have in effect expelled the Holy Spirit from their
    souls because He cannot live in a soul that is stained by
    mortal sin.

                            SALVATION COMES FROM GOD

         It is a truth of our faith, one that as Catholics we must
    believe, that there is no salvation apart from Jesus Christ.
    Since the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ, it is by means
    of her that salvation is of necessity made available to us.  In
    what way does this happen?

         THE ORDINARY MANNER

         God bestows His gifts with consummate grace and
    generosity.  In order to make it possible for men to save
    themselves more easily, His Son instituted and made available
    to them true sources of grace in the sacraments.  God has
    obligated Himself to give us graces by these sensible signs,
    and He is always faithful to His promises.  Each time a
    sacrament is properly administered, by one who has the power to
    do so, and as long as men do not hinder His action, God is
    obliged to provide them with the grace signified.  This is the
    constant teaching of the Catholic Church.

         THE EXTRAORDINARY MANNER

         If the Church teaches that the sacraments instituted by
    the Son of God made man oblige the Father to give His graces to
    whomsoever validly receives them, she has never taught that His
    generosity is restricted to this methodology.  If the Lord was
    obliged to give those who labored the entire day the denarius
    he had agreed upon, His Son reminds us that He did no wrong in
    giving as much to those to whom He had promised nothing.  Who
    can be so presumptuous as to pretend that He is not allowed to
    do as He wishes?  What upright soul can take offense at His
    generosity? (Read Matt. XX:1-16).  It is then clear that God,
    who has promised to give His graces through these ordinary
    means of the sacraments, can also give them in an extraordinary
    manner.  Holy Scripture provides us with numerous examples of
    this.  Thus, Saint Dismas, the good thief, received the grace
    of regeneration without any sacrament, and this with such
    efficacy that Our Lord said to him, "This very day you will be
    with me in Paradise" (Luke XXIII:43).

         Again, it was without the medium of any sacrament that the
    Virgin Mary, the Apostles and "the brothers who numbered around
    120" (Acts I:15), "all together in one place" (II:1), were
    filled with the Holy Spirit and were confirmed.

         The centurion Cornelius, his parents, servants and most
    intimate friends also received the Holy Spirit and were
    gathered into the Soul of the Church before even being Baptized
    by Peter.  Baptism brought them into the Body of the Church,
    but not into her Soul, for they were joined to the latter as
    soon as they received the Holy Spirit (Acts X:44-48).

         Closer to our own time we can cite the case of Ratisbonne,
    a Jєω who was overcome by grace on January 20, 1842 while in
    the church of Saint Andrew in Rome.  He changed from a state of
    complete disbelief and hostility to the Church to one of
    complete acceptance of the Catholic faith.  At the same time he
    received a knowledge of the Christian mysteries that he had
    never studied.  Like his co-religionist Paul of Tarsus, Baptism
    attached Ratisbonne only to the Body of the Church.  He
    belonged to the Soul of the Church from the moment of his
    conversion, thanks to the virtue of theological faith.

         These examples show with a certitude which cannot be
    denied that it is possible to belong to the Soul of the Church
    without belonging to her Body, and that God can bestow His
    graces in an extraordinary manner which is independent of the
    sacraments.

         WHO IS ASSURED OF HIS SALVATION?

         It is important that we remember that what saves us from
    eternal damnation is not belonging to the Body of the Church,
    but rather belonging to the Soul of the Church.  The Church has
    always taught that the baptized who die in a state of mortal
    sin which has not been forgiven, are damned despite their
    belonging to the Body of the Church.  Without doubt, it is not
    possible for those who refuse to attach themselves to the Body
    of the Church to belong to her Soul.  But is it possible for
    those who, without any fault of their own, cannot receive
    baptism of water or explicitly formulate an act of Catholic
    faith in order to be part of the Body of the Church to belong
    to the Soul of the Church and be assured of their salvation?
    The response to this question provides us with the solution to
    the problem which the salvation of non-Catholics raises.

         By means of the letter "Quanto conficiamur" given to the
    Italian episcopacy (on August 10, 1863), Pius IX clarified this
    matter in a striking manner.  "We know", he said, "that those
    WHO ARE INVINCIBLY IGNORANT OF OUR MOST HOLY RELIGION, AND WHO
    OBSERVE WITH CARE THE NATURAL LAW AND ITS PRECEPTS, written by
    God in the hearts of all men, AND WHO ARE DISPOSED TO OBEY GOD,
    and who live a life which is honest and upright, can, with the
    aid of the light of divine grace, acquire eternal salvation."

         If they can acquire eternal life without belonging to the
    Body of the Church, it is because they are united to her Soul.
    Under what conditions does this occur?  The papal text goes on
    to explain.

                                THE NON-CATHOLICS

         This phrase is very vague.  It designates individuals who
    span the spectrum from schismatic Christians to atheists, and
    embraces in between a host of religious groups, both Christian
    and non-Christian.  If all, in so far as they are non-Catholic,
    are outside the Ark of Salvation, not all have the same degree
    of difficulty in order to overcome the obstacles and enter into
    this Ark.  The followers of Photius (the Orthodox) need only
    accept those dogmas which relate to the primacy and
    infallibility of the Pope.[2]  The followers of Luther, who
    deny almost all the Catholic dogmas, have much greater
    obstacles to overcome.  As for the Jєωs and Muslims, obstinate
    in their opposition to the divine mysteries (the Trinity and
    Christology), they are faced with the problem of denying
    principles that are fundamental to their religion if they wish
    to truly enter into the way of salvation.

         With regard to these latter and all those who deny the
    mysteries of God, it is necessary to make the following point.
    If it is possible that non-Catholics can belong to the Soul of
    the Church while in good faith knowing nothing of the divine
    Mysteries, this is absolutely impossible for those who
    blaspheme against them.  Those who imprecate (blaspheme
    against) these mysteries clearly manifest that they are not
    animated by the good Spirit and that they do not belong to the
    Soul of the Church .

                 NECESSARY CONDITIONS WHICH MUST BE FULFILLED
             FOR NON-CATHOLICS TO BELONG TO THE SOUL OF THE CHURCH

         INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

         This is the error in which those who without any fault on
    their part find themselves.  It presumes good faith.  It can be
    met with among those to whom the true religion has never been
    presented, and among those to whom it has been presented and to
    whom, despite this, it does not appear to be the truth.  Such
    is to be found in parts of the world which are completely
    adherent to the schismatic churches or some other cult, such as
    Islam, Judaism, Protestantism, etc.  This ignorance excuses
    those involved of all culpability.  One calls this invincible
    because they are prevented from abandoning their errors
    precisely because they believe they are adhering to the truth.

         Invincible ignorance only excuses the faults committed
    against the existence, the nature and the demands of the one
    true religion.  It never excuses those faults that go against
    the precepts of natural law since such are "written in the
    hearts of all men by God Himself".

         IT IS NECESSARY TO CAREFULLY OBEY THE NATURAL LAW AND ALL
    ITS PRECEPTS.

         Among the demands of this law, and in fact of primary
    importance, are our duties towards God.  Whatever his state or
    condition, man is obliged to recognize the existence of God,
    His sovereignty, and believe that He rewards man for the good
    that he does, and punishes him for the evil that he does.
    "Without faith", St. Paul affirms, "it is impossible to please
    God.  It is necessary for a person who comes to God to believe
    that He exists, that He rewards those that seek after Him"
    (Heb. XI:6).  Such excludes from salvation all those non-
    Catholics who are atheists, be they of the militant or
    indifferent variety.

         We know from St. Paul the reasons for their culpability.
    "Because that which is known of God is manifest in them.  For
    God hath manifested it unto them.  For the invisible things of
    Him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being
    understood by the things that are made; His eternal power also,
    and divinity: so that they are inexcusable.  Because that, when
    they knew God, they have not glorified Him as God, or given
    thanks" (Rom. I:19-21).  The Church recalled this teaching of
    the faith at Vatican I: "If anyone says that the one and true
    God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certitude by
    means of His works, thanks to the natural light of human
    reason, let him be anathema" (Const. "Dei Filius", Denz.
    1806).

         IT IS NECESSARY TO BE DISPOSED TO OBEY GOD AND IN ALL
    THINGS TO DESIRE HIS GOOD PLEASURE.

         In his Encyclical "Mystici Corporis Christi", Pope Pius
    XII, after having distinguished between those who are actually
    incorporated into the Church, and those who are united only by
    desire to her soul, adds: "However, one should not think that
    any kind of desire to be part of the Church suffices for the
    salvation of one's soul.  The desire required is one animated
    by perfect charity".  In so stating, Pius XII was but
    reiterating the third condition specified by Pius IX.

         The law of love should express itself by action rather
    than by words: "It is not all those who say Lord, Lord, but
    those who do the will of my Father who will enter into the
    kingdom of heaven" (Cf. Matt. VII:21).

         This disposition in everything to do the will of God is an
    indication of their implicit but true desire to adhere to the
    Catholic Church.  Their faith in God is not dead because it is
    productive of fruit.  In essence, they are not content merely
    with believing; they make their conduct conform to their
    belief, and this concordance of their will with that of God
    makes them implicitly, but truly, desire the Baptism that Jesus
    instituted in order to incorporate them into His Church if they
    are not Christian, and makes them disposed to abjure the errors
    which maintain them outside of the Church if they are misled
    and are in a schismatical or heretical sect.  Unquestionably,
    if they were aware of the fact, they would abjure their errors,
    as they are well disposed to submit to His will.  It is this
    disposition, this charity which God has given them, which
    inclines them to "do the will of the Father in Heaven", and
    which gathers them into the soul of the Church.

         ARE YOU NOT SETTING UP IMPOSSIBLE CRITERIA?

         Some think that all these conditions cannot be fulfilled,
    especially among those souls that have never known the true
    religion.  As they see it, to demand such criteria is
    equivalent to condemning virtually all non-Catholics to eternal
    damnation.  But they are quite wrong.  Those who see things in
    this way forget the words of Jesus to His disciples when they
    questioned Him precisely on the issue of how it was possible
    for anyone to save his soul: "With men it is impossible, but
    not with God: for all things are possible with God" (Mark
    X:27).

         If God helps non-Catholics to save their souls outside of
    the norms established by His Son, it is because He would "have
    all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth"
    (I Tim. II:4).  This desire induces the Father to continuously
    draw souls (John VI:44) that His Son chooses (John XV:16).  In
    order to enlighten them, He normally uses the ministers of His
    Church.  But this habitual disposition in no way hinders Him
    from drawing some souls directly and without any minister
    whatsoever, and regardless of the situation in which they find
    themselves.  God, who wishes the salvation of every soul,
    provides every soul with the necessary graces.  To that degree
    that a given soul responds to graces bestowed, it receives yet
    further graces, "for it is God that worketh in you, both to
    will and to accomplish" (Phil. II:13).  It is thus that the
    most profound transformations occur little by little in souls
    of good will and dispose such souls above all to desire to do
    the will of God whom they adore "in truth".  Not all these
    souls are visited with extraordinary graces which transform
    them "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye" (I Cor. XV:52)
    as occurred to Saul or Ratisbonne.  It is "the wisdom of God
    which visits them ... for wisdom is more active than all active
    things ...  Wisdom is the splendor of the eternal light ...
    which renews all things and through the nations conveyeth
    herself into holy souls, she maketh the friends of God ...  She
    reacheth from one end of the world to the other and ordereth
    all things sweetly" (Wisdom, VII:24-27, VIII:1).  This is that
    sweetness "for the forgiveness of their sins"; this is that
    "visit of the rising Sun from on high[4] which enlightens those
    who are in darkness and in the shadow of death and directs them
    in the way of peace" that Zacharias sang of in his "Benedictus"
    canticle which was and is in effect "the entrails of the
    mercy[5] of our God" (Luke I:78-79).

                   A CATHOLIC RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION RAISED

         We are able, in complete accord with Catholic teaching, to
    respond in the affirmative to the question which was raised
    above.  Yes indeed, through the great mercy of our God, it is
    possible that non-Catholics belong to the Soul of the Church by
    an implicit desire, by a desire animated by perfect charity,
    even though they do not belong to the visible Body of the
    Church.

         Are there many such?  Only God Himself knows.  "The works
    of man, Ecclesiastes tells us, are in the hands of God, and man
    knoweth not whether he be worthy of love or hatred" (IX:1).
    Only Jesus, the good pastor "knows His sheep ... even those
    that are not yet of His sheepfold" (John X:14&16).  As for us,
    if we truly love our master, we should hope that the number of
    non-Catholics who belong to the soul of the Church will always
    increase.  And in order to be sure that such a desire is not
    void of content, we should work as hard as we can to enlighten
    such souls, above all in praying for them and in making
    sacrifices in order that God might, by means of His Holy
    Spirit, enlighten them so that they might be renewed in their
    dispositions with regard to the true religion.

         Now, even though these non-Catholics belong to Christ by
    means of their union with the Soul of His Church, one should
    nevertheless never forget that they are in a state "where no
    one can be sure of his eternal salvation; for, as the Pope
    assures us, they are deprived of those many and most important
    supports and heavenly favors that can only be found within the
    bosom of the Catholic Church" ("Mystici Corporis Christi").
    Let us consider some of those helps of which they are deprived.

         The Roman Catholic Church is HIS Church.  It is the Church
    to whom Our Lord confided all that He learned of His Father
    (John XV:15), and it is the ministers of His Church that He
    sent forth as His Father sent Him (John XX:21), to teach all
    nations to observe EVERYTHING that He commanded (Matthew
    XXVIII:19-20).  Outside of this Church souls lack access to ALL
    that He taught.  Now Jesus warned His own that "if you continue
    in my word ... you will know the truth and the truth will make
    you free" (John VIII:31-32).  Being separated from His Church,
    non-Catholics are bound to be in error on one or more points.
    Now, just as the truth frees and sanctifies those that accept
    it (John XVII:17), so also is error the work of the devil which
    enslaves those who follow it (John VIII:44).

         It is also to HIS Church that Jesus confided the seven
    sacraments; non-Catholics are deprived of this, and this
    deprivation can only make their perseverance in the path of
    salvation more precarious.  While there is no doubt but that
    some of the sects have preserved the priestly function intact
    and this for them is a source of grace, unfortunately for them,
    they use it in a reprehensible manner.  For, in effect, it is
    to HIS Church that the sacraments were confided, and not to
    those who have broken away from her.  In conferring on the
    ministers that she ordains this inamissible power (i.e., a
    power that cannot be lost), the Church is placing her
    confidence in them.  Never would she have confided this power
    to them if she thought they would defect from her.  Surely any
    honest individual can understand that a person who leaves a
    society no longer has the right to use those powers which said
    society confided to him.  If he does so in spite of this
    defection, he is guilty of an abuse for which he will one day
    have to answer.

         Sacraments conferred under such circuмstances are
    productive of [spiritual] life to those who accept them in
    perfect good faith and place no obstacle to their reception.
    For all others, they are productive of spiritual death.

         Another support which is by no means the least of which
    non Catholics - schismatics apart - are deprived is that of the
    sacrament of penance.  If even within the Church where one
    enjoys the greatest of possible benefits, one must "work out
    one's salvation with fear and trembling" (Phil. II:12), how
    much more one should tremble for the salvation of those who do
    not belong to her body!  The ability to commit mortal sin is
    not limited to Catholics.  Now it is a dogma of our faith that
    every mortal sin which is not forgiven merits by its very
    nature eternal hell.  While it is easy to commit a mortal sin,
    it is much more difficult to escape its effects.  This is the
    reason why Our Lord instituted the sacrament of penance which
    the Fathers of the Church call a second baptism and the second
    safeguard of salvation.  While a Catholic who finds himself
    incapable of achieving a state of perfect contrition can still
    be forgiven by means of this sacrament of penance, the
    non-Catholic who is deprived of this sacrament can only be
    forgiven by attaining a state of perfect contrition.[6]  From
    this fact alone one can see how privileged, with regard to the
    matter of salvation, are those who belong to the Body of the
    Church and who as a result can so easily enjoy the treasures of
    her graces.  And as opposed to these, how disadvantaged are
    those who are deprived of such favors!  Pius XII spoke to us of
    those who are in a state "where no one can be sure of his
    eternal salvation".  One should not be surprised that God
    wished these facilities, and His Son has established HIS
    Church, precisely to make salvation easier to those who wished
    to enter it.

                                   CONCLUSION

         It is precisely because the true Church of Christ took
    this dogma seriously that she has desired to be a missionary
    Church since Apostolic times.  In this she is but reflecting
    the word of the Master who made her aware of the terrible
    danger that those who do not know her to be the only Ark of
    Salvation and continue to live in the darkness of idolatry, or
    other religions, or in heresy and schism, run with regard to
    their eternal salvation.  This is why she sends forth so many
    thousands of her sons and daughters at the risk of their lives
    to enlighten non-believers.

         And in so doing the Catholic Church is aware of the fact
    that she is responding faithfully to the command of Our Lord:
    "Go forth to all the nations and make disciples, baptizing them
    in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit,
    teaching them to observe all those things which I have
    commanded you.  He who believes and is baptized will be saved;
    but he who does not believe will be condemned" (Matt. XXVIII:
    19-20; Mark XVI:16).

         It is because of her faithfulness to her Lord that this
    same Catholic Church has a special Mass entitled "De Progaganda
    Fide" in her Missal, a Mass in which she recalls that "her Lord
    is great and infinitely worthy of praise; for He is more
    powerful than all the other gods.  FOR ALL THE GODS OF THE
    PEOPLES ARE ONLY DEMONS" (Tractus).

         It is again because of her faithfulness to her Lord who
    became flesh and offered himself on the Cross for the salvation
    of all men that the Catholic Church multiplies her prayers and
    beseeches her children to make sacrifices "in order that God
    might provide workers for the harvest" (Matt. IX:38), and that
    He might send His Holy Spirit to renew the face of the earth
    and enlighten those who are "seated in darkness and in the
    shadow of death" (Luke I:79).  The Apostle strongly recommends
    this practice to his dear Timothy: "I desire first of all that
    supplications, prayers, intercessions and thanksgiving be made
    for all men ... for this is good and acceptable in the sight of
    God our Saviour" (I Tim. II:1-3).

                                       *
                                     * * *

        THE NEED TO SUBMIT TO THE MAGISTERIUM OF THE CHURCH IN ORDER TO
         AVOID FALLING INTO ERROR WITH REGARD TO MATTERS PERTAINING TO
                                  THE FAITH.

         Sometimes the simplest dogmas are difficult to interpret.
    In order not to fall into error, it is absolutely necessary for
    us to submit to the Magisterium instituted by our Lord who
    commanded that we listen to this authority as if He were
    Himself speaking.  The two examples which I am going to provide
    will make the danger to our salvation of bypassing this
    obligation abundantly clear.

         THE FIRST is provided for us by Father Feeney, a brilliant
    priest who was inspired by the best of intentions.  He was
    shocked and confused by the liberals whom he saw as existing
    all around him, and even among those who had Magisterial
    authority.  In order to sustain his rigorist interpretation of
    the dogma that "There is no salvation outside the Church", he
    preferred to be cast out of her bosom by a true and valid
    excommunication rather than accept the infallible teaching of
    the Magisterium of the Church.

         In 1940, the Saint Benedict Center was founded in
    Cambridge, Massachusetts (U.S.A.).  Its purpose was to provide
    religious instruction for the students of the non-Catholic
    universities in that city.  In order to avoid any compromise
    with the liberal ambiance and in order to teach authentic
    Catholic doctrine, the directors and professors at this center
    resolved to base their teaching on the Scriptures and writings
    of the Fathers, Doctors and Saints of the Church.  The success
    of this Center was immediate, for it filled a serious void.

         In 1942 Father Leonard Feeney was named director of the
    Saint Benedict's Center.  He was a 45 year old Jesuit, and was,
    according to his Provincial Superior, Father McEleney, "by far
    the greatest theologian in the United States".  Father McEleney
    was the future Archbishop of Jamaica.

         It was only a matter of time before this Center attacked
    the atheists and liberal Christians in Massachusetts.  In
    September of 1947, Dr. Fedhri Maluf inaugurated a study in
    "From the Housetops" (the publication of this Center) entitled
    "Sentimental theology" in which religious liberalism was
    attacked head-on.  This was too much and the atheists and
    liberals launched an attack against the center.  Among these
    were included Bishop John Wright whom Paul VI raised to the
    Cardinalate and made prefect of the Congregation for the
    Clergy.

         In this very liberal climate which reigned in the United
    States, the students at the St. Benedict's Center were
    particularly upset by the erroneous interpretation given to
    certain dogmas, especially among those involved in the
    Ecuмenical movement.  In their opinion, the false
    interpretation which was being given to the dogma that "Outside
    the Church there is no salvation" was at the basis of all this
    liberal teaching.  And in reaction to this they gave the same
    dogma a most rigorous interpretation.  They were playing into
    the hands of the liberals.

         This rapidly stirred up a reaction and in April of 1949
    Dr. Maluf and three other professors, all members of the St.
    Benedict's Center, were expelled from the Jesuit house in
    Boston for having taught an erroneous doctrine.  They claimed
    that all those who were not explicitly members of the visible
    Church were damned, and accused all those who denied this of
    being heretics.

         In order to explain the reasons to the press, the Very
    Reverend Wilham L. Keleher, S.J., President of Boston College,
    declared: "They persisted in teaching, both in and outside the
    classroom, doctrines which contradicted the traditional
    teaching of the Catholic Church, ideas that fostered fanaticism
    and intolerance."

         The affair became a scandal when on April 17, 1949 Father
    Leonard Feeney publicly undertook the defense of these
    professors and their doctrine.

         The following day, Richard J. Cushing, the Archbishop of
    Boston, without any warning to the interested parties, declared
    to the press that Father Leonard Feeney was suspended "a
    divinis"[7] in the archdiocese and the Saint Benedict's Center
    placed under interdict.

         Considering this double sanction to be against Canon Law,
    Father Feeney appealed to Rome.[8]  From then on, there was
    open war between the priest and the local authorities.

         On the 8th of August, 1949, Cardinal
    Marchetti-Salvaggiani, Secretary of the Holy Office, wrote to
    the Archbishop of Boston and sent him a Declaration of this
    Holy Office to be conveyed to Father Feeney, which made clear
    the sense in which one should understand the doctrine that
    "There is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church".  Father
    Feeney, refused to adhere to this declaration and wrote with
    regard to the matter that "it can be considered as having
    established a two-sided policy in order to propagate error".

         On October 28th, Father Feeney was expelled from the
    Jesuit Order.

         Things remained unchanged until September 14, 1952.  At
    this point the Archbishop of Boston demanded that Father Feeney
    retract his false interpretation and make an "explicit
    profession of submission" to the Roman Declaration within one
    month or suffer the penalty of being reduced to the state of a
    layman.

         Father Feeney, accompanied by four witnesses, presented
    himself before his archbishop.  He told him that his only
    option was to declare the letter of Marchetti-Salvaggiani
    "absolutely scandalous because it was frankly heretical".  Then
    he asked His Excellency if he was in agreement with the views
    expressed by the Roman Declaration.  He obtained the following
    response: "I am not a theologian.  All that I know is what I am
    told".  Then, in the presence of these witnesses, Father Feeney
    accused the archbishop of failing to perform his duty, and
    left.

         On September 24, 1952, a letter was sent from the Saint
    Benedict Center to Pius XII accusing the Archbishop of Boston
    of heresy.

         In October of 1952, Cardinal Pizzardo summoned Father
    Feeney to present himself in Rome for a hearing by the Holy
    Office.  Father Feeney accepted on condition that they told him
    beforehand what the charges against him were.  Not receiving
    any response, he did not comply.

         On February 16, 1953, the "Acta Apostolicae Sedis"
    announced the excommunication of Father Leonard Feeney.  The
    following is an official translation of the Decree:

         "Since Father Leonard Feeney remained in Boston (Saint
    Benedict Center) and since he has been suspended from
    performing his priestly duties for a long time because of his
    grave disobedience to the Authority of the Church, in no way
    moved by repeated warnings and threats of incurring
    excommunication "ipso facto", and has still failed to submit,
    the most Eminent and reverend Fathers, charged with the
    responsibility of safeguarding faith and morals, during a
    plenary session held on February 4, 1953, have declared him
    excommunicated with all the effects that this has in law.

         "On Thursday, February 12, 1953, Our Most Holy Father Pius
    XII, Pope by Divine Providence, has approved and confirmed the
    decree of these Most Eminent Fathers, and ordered that this be
    made a matter of public record."

         Given in Rome in the general quarters of the Holy Office,
    February 13, 1953.  Marius Crovini, notary.

         Since then, and in spite of the sanctions of the Holy
    Office, Father Feeney has made the St. Benedict Center the
    headquarters of a Society of about one hundred individuals who
    call themselves the "Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary",
    and who have undertaken to propagate this condemned doctrine
    about the salvation of non-Catholics, while accusing the
    Archbishop of Boston and all who agree with his interpretation
    of being heretics.

                                  *     *     *

         The following is the decision of the Sacred Congregation
    of the Holy Office promulgated July 27, 1949, and to which
    Father Feeney refused to subscribe.  It was only made public in
    September of 1952.  It was included in the works of Pius XII;
    and one can read it in "Denzinger", Nos. 3866-3877.  The
    translation given below is taken from the "American
    Ecclesiastical Review", Vol. CXXVII, October 1952:

         " ...  We are bound by divine and Catholic faith to
    believe all those things contained in the Word of God, be it
    Scripture or Tradition, and which are proposed by the Church to
    be believed as divinely revealed, not only through solemn
    judgement but also through the ordinary and universal teaching
    office (magisterium).

         "Now, among those things which the Church has always
    preached and will never cease to preach, there is also that
    infallible statement by which we are taught that there is no
    salvation outside the Church.

         "However this dogma must be understood in the sense that
    the Church itself understands it.  For our Saviour gave the
    things that are contained in the deposit of faith to be
    explained by the ecclesiastical magisterium and not by private
    judgements

         "Now, in the first place, the Church teaches that in this
    matter we are dealing with a most strict precept of Jesus
    Christ.  For He explicitly ordered His apostles to teach all
    nations to observe all things whatsoever He Himself had
    commanded.

         "Now, not the least important among the commandments of
    Christ is that one by which we are commanded to be incorporated
    by baptism into the Mystical Body of Christ, which is the
    Church, and to remain united to Christ and to His Vicar,
    through whom He Himself governs the Church on earth in a
    visible manner.

         "Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church
    to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless
    refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the
    Roman Pontiff, the vicar of Christ on earth.

         "The Saviour not only gave the precept that all nations
    should enter the Church, but He also established the Church aa
    a means of salvation, without which no one may be able to enter
    the kingdom of eternal glory.

         "In His infinite mercy, God has willed that the effect
    necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation
    which are directed towards man's final end, not by intrinsic
    necessity but only by divine institution, can also be obtained
    in certain circuмstances when these helps are used only in
    intention or desire ("ubi voto solummodo vel desiderio
    adhibeantur").  This we see clearly stated in the Sacred
    Council of Trent, both with reference to the sacrament of
    regeneration and with reference to the sacrament of penance.

          "In its own way, the same thing must be said about the
    Church, insofar as the Church itself is a general help to
    salvation.  Therefore, in order that one may obtain eternal
    salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated
    into the Church actually as a member, but it is required that
    at least he be united to it by intention and desire.

         "However, this desire need not always be explicit, as it
    is in catechumens; but, when a person is involved in invincible
     ignorance, God accepts also an implicit intention ("votum")                    
    which is so called because it is included in that good
    disposition of the soul whereby a person wishes his will to be
    conformed to the will of God.

         "These things are clearly taught in that dogmatic letter
    which was issued by the Sovereign Pontiff, Pope Pius XII, on
    June 29,1943, on the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ.  For in
    this letter the Sovereign Pontiff clearly distinguishes between
    those who are really ("in re") incorporated into the Church as
    members and those who are joined to it only in intention ("in
    voto").

         Discussing the members of whom the Mystical Body is
    composed here on earth, the same August Pontiff says: "Only
    those who have received the laver of regeneration, who profess
    the true faith, who have not miserably separated themselves
    from the fabric of the Church or been expelled by legitimate
    authority by reason of very serious offences, are actually to
    be counted as members of the Church."

         Towards the end of the same encyclical letter, "when most
    affectionately inviting to unity those who do not belong to the
    body of the Catholic Church ("qui ad Ecclesiae Catholica
    compagem non pertinent")", he mentions "those who are ordered
    to the Redeemer's Mystical Body by a sort of unconscious
    desire and intention", and these he by no means excludes from
    eternal salvation, but on the other hand, asserts that "they
    are in a condition in which they cannot be secure about their
    own eternal salvation, since they still lack so many and such
    great heavenly helps to salvation that can be enjoyed only in
    the Catholic Church."

         "With these wise words he reproves both those who exclude
    from eternal salvation all those united to the Church only by
    implicit desire and those who falsely assert that men can be
    saved equally ("aequaliter") in every religion."

         "Nor must we think that any kind of intention of entering  
    the Church is sufficient in order that one may be saved.  It      is
    requisite that the intention by which one is ordered to the
    Church should be informed by perfect charity; and no explicit    
    intention can produce its effect unless the man have
    supernatural faith: "For he who comes to God must believe that  
    He exists and is a rewarder of those who seek Him" (Hebr.
    XI:6).  The council of Trent declares: "Faith is the beginning
    of man's salvation, the foundation and root of all
    justification, without which it is impossible to please God and
    attain to the fellowship of His children."

         A SECOND EXAMPLE is provided by the present occupant of
    the Chair of Peter.  Blinded by his modernist faith, John Paul
    II takes a stance in direct contradiction to his predecessors
    and affirms that it is possible to save one's soul outside of
    the Catholic Church.  In affirming this he makes himself
    anathema, for he blasphemes the holy Spouse of Jesus Christ.[9]
    To quote him directly:

         "It can be said that those who do not belong to the
    visible organism of the Church are [nevertheless] full of a
    particular hope of salvation" (General Audience, May 21, 1980).

         "The oriental patriarchs who are separated from the
    Catholic Church are charged with accomplishing that with which
    the apostles were commissioned" (Nairobi, May 7, 1980).

         "Christians of different confessions are united in the
    Holy Spirit by the bonds of an incomplete communion" (To the
    representatives of the non-Catholics of Japan, February 24,
    1981).

         "Moslems are our brothers, believing in the same unique
    God" (Discourse given to Moslems in Paris, May 31, 1980).

         "The Holy Spirit is even mysteriously present in the
    religions and cultures of non-Christians ...  One could say of
    the Holy Spirit that, so great and generous is this Spirit,
    that each person has part of him, and all have the totality of
    him" (To the International Congress of Pneumatology, March 26,
    1982).

         "The Spirit of Christ does not refuse to use the other
    separated Churches and ecclesiastical communities as a means of
    salvation" (Apostolic Exhortation, "Catechesi tradendae").

         The Holy Spirit not only refuses to use as a means of
    salvation those groups established in heresy or schism, but, as
    I have shown above, for a non-Catholic to be gathered into the
    soul of the Church, it is necessary that he be at least
    implicitly detached from schism or heresy, in which states he
    is presumed to be in good faith.  One should never forget that
    the God who saves is never the "father of lies", of error or of
    schism.  As He Himself explained, "I am the Truth" (John
    XIV:6).

    cf. http://www.the-pope.com/fif.html


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Noel Barbara (RIP) on Salvation
    « Reply #1 on: December 13, 2014, 02:30:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41897
    • Reputation: +23940/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Noel Barbara (RIP) on Salvation
    « Reply #2 on: December 13, 2014, 11:41:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • THE SALVATION OF NON-CATHOLICS
    ...
    THE SALVATION OF THOSE OUTSIDE THE CHURCH

    This is an absolutely heretical hodgepodge of gratuitous statements and contradictions.  Even Msgr. Fenton would denounce this as heretical garbage.  I could go through sentence by sentence and pick out the erroneous propositions.

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1484/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Noel Barbara (RIP) on Salvation
    « Reply #3 on: December 13, 2014, 08:20:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is some additional material from the same issue of Fortes in Fide.

        THE NEED TO SUBMIT TO THE MAGISTERIUM OF THE CHURCH IN ORDER TO
         AVOID FALLING INTO ERROR WITH REGARD TO MATTERS PERTAINING TO
                                  THE FAITH.

         Sometimes the simplest dogmas are difficult to interpret.
    In order not to fall into error, it is absolutely necessary for
    us to submit to the Magisterium instituted by our Lord who
    commanded that we listen to this authority as if He were
    Himself speaking.  The two examples which I am going to provide
    will make the danger to our salvation of bypassing this
    obligation abundantly clear.

         THE FIRST is provided for us by Father Feeney, a brilliant
    priest who was inspired by the best of intentions.  He was
    shocked and confused by the liberals whom he saw as existing
    all around him, and even among those who had Magisterial
    authority.  In order to sustain his rigorist interpretation of
    the dogma that "There is no salvation outside the Church", he
    preferred to be cast out of her bosom by a true and valid
    excommunication rather than accept the infallible teaching of
    the Magisterium of the Church.

         In 1940, the Saint Benedict Center was founded in
    Cambridge, Massachusetts (U.S.A.).  Its purpose was to provide
    religious instruction for the students of the non-Catholic
    universities in that city.  In order to avoid any compromise
    with the liberal ambiance and in order to teach authentic
    Catholic doctrine, the directors and professors at this center
    resolved to base their teaching on the Scriptures and writings
    of the Fathers, Doctors and Saints of the Church.  The success
    of this Center was immediate, for it filled a serious void.

         In 1942 Father Leonard Feeney was named director of the
    Saint Benedict's Center.  He was a 45 year old Jesuit, and was,
    according to his Provincial Superior, Father McEleney, "by far
    the greatest theologian in the United States".  Father McEleney
    was the future Archbishop of Jamaica.

         It was only a matter of time before this Center attacked
    the atheists and liberal Christians in Massachusetts.  In
    September of 1947, Dr. Fedhri Maluf inaugurated a study in
    "From the Housetops" (the publication of this Center) entitled
    "Sentimental theology" in which religious liberalism was
    attacked head-on.  This was too much and the atheists and
    liberals launched an attack against the center.  Among these
    were included Bishop John Wright whom Paul VI raised to the
    Cardinalate and made prefect of the Congregation for the
    Clergy.

         In this very liberal climate which reigned in the United
    States, the students at the St. Benedict's Center were
    particularly upset by the erroneous interpretation given to
    certain dogmas, especially among those involved in the
    Ecuмenical movement.  In their opinion, the false
    interpretation which was being given to the dogma that "Outside
    the Church there is no salvation" was at the basis of all this
    liberal teaching.  And in reaction to this they gave the same
    dogma a most rigorous interpretation.  They were playing into
    the hands of the liberals.

         This rapidly stirred up a reaction and in April of 1949
    Dr. Maluf and three other professors, all members of the St.
    Benedict's Center, were expelled from the Jesuit house in
    Boston for having taught an erroneous doctrine.  They claimed
    that all those who were not explicitly members of the visible
    Church were damned, and accused all those who denied this of
    being heretics.

         In order to explain the reasons to the press, the Very
    Reverend Wilham L. Keleher, S.J., President of Boston College,
    declared: "They persisted in teaching, both in and outside the
    classroom, doctrines which contradicted the traditional
    teaching of the Catholic Church, ideas that fostered fanaticism
    and intolerance."

         The affair became a scandal when on April 17, 1949 Father
    Leonard Feeney publicly undertook the defense of these
    professors and their doctrine.

         The following day, Richard J. Cushing, the Archbishop of
    Boston, without any warning to the interested parties, declared
    to the press that Father Leonard Feeney was suspended "a
    divinis"[7] in the archdiocese and the Saint Benedict's Center
    placed under interdict.

         Considering this double sanction to be against Canon Law,
    Father Feeney appealed to Rome.[8]  From then on, there was
    open war between the priest and the local authorities.

         On the 8th of August, 1949, Cardinal
    Marchetti-Salvaggiani, Secretary of the Holy Office, wrote to
    the Archbishop of Boston and sent him a Declaration of this
    Holy Office to be conveyed to Father Feeney, which made clear
    the sense in which one should understand the doctrine that
    "There is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church".  Father
    Feeney, refused to adhere to this declaration and wrote with
    regard to the matter that "it can be considered as having
    established a two-sided policy in order to propagate error".

         On October 28th, Father Feeney was expelled from the
    Jesuit Order.

         Things remained unchanged until September 14, 1952.  At
    this point the Archbishop of Boston demanded that Father Feeney
    retract his false interpretation and make an "explicit
    profession of submission" to the Roman Declaration within one
    month or suffer the penalty of being reduced to the state of a
    layman.

         Father Feeney, accompanied by four witnesses, presented
    himself before his archbishop.  He told him that his only
    option was to declare the letter of Marchetti-Salvaggiani
    "absolutely scandalous because it was frankly heretical".  Then
    he asked His Excellency if he was in agreement with the views
    expressed by the Roman Declaration.  He obtained the following
    response: "I am not a theologian.  All that I know is what I am
    told".  Then, in the presence of these witnesses, Father Feeney
    accused the archbishop of failing to perform his duty, and
    left.

         On September 24, 1952, a letter was sent from the Saint
    Benedict Center to Pius XII accusing the Archbishop of Boston
    of heresy.

         In October of 1952, Cardinal Pizzardo summoned Father
    Feeney to present himself in Rome for a hearing by the Holy
    Office.  Father Feeney accepted on condition that they told him
    beforehand what the charges against him were.  Not receiving
    any response, he did not comply.

         On February 16, 1953, the "Acta Apostolicae Sedis"
    announced the excommunication of Father Leonard Feeney.  The
    following is an official translation of the Decree:

         "Since Father Leonard Feeney remained in Boston (Saint
    Benedict Center) and since he has been suspended from
    performing his priestly duties for a long time because of his
    grave disobedience to the Authority of the Church, in no way
    moved by repeated warnings and threats of incurring
    excommunication "ipso facto", and has still failed to submit,
    the most Eminent and reverend Fathers, charged with the
    responsibility of safeguarding faith and morals, during a
    plenary session held on February 4, 1953, have declared him
    excommunicated with all the effects that this has in law.

         "On Thursday, February 12, 1953, Our Most Holy Father Pius
    XII, Pope by Divine Providence, has approved and confirmed the
    decree of these Most Eminent Fathers, and ordered that this be
    made a matter of public record."

         Given in Rome in the general quarters of the Holy Office,
    February 13, 1953.  Marius Crovini, notary.

         Since then, and in spite of the sanctions of the Holy
    Office, Father Feeney has made the St. Benedict Center the
    headquarters of a Society of about one hundred individuals who
    call themselves the "Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary",
    and who have undertaken to propagate this condemned doctrine
    about the salvation of non-Catholics, while accusing the
    Archbishop of Boston and all who agree with his interpretation
    of being heretics.

                                  *     *     *

         The following is the decision of the Sacred Congregation
    of the Holy Office promulgated July 27, 1949, and to which
    Father Feeney refused to subscribe.  It was only made public in
    September of 1952.  It was included in the works of Pius XII;
    and one can read it in "Denzinger", Nos. 3866-3877.  The
    translation given below is taken from the "American
    Ecclesiastical Review", Vol. CXXVII, October 1952:

         " ...  We are bound by divine and Catholic faith to
    believe all those things contained in the Word of God, be it
    Scripture or Tradition, and which are proposed by the Church to
    be believed as divinely revealed, not only through solemn
    judgement but also through the ordinary and universal teaching
    office (magisterium).

         "Now, among those things which the Church has always
    preached and will never cease to preach, there is also that
    infallible statement by which we are taught that there is no
    salvation outside the Church.

         "However this dogma must be understood in the sense that
    the Church itself understands it.  For our Saviour gave the
    things that are contained in the deposit of faith to be
    explained by the ecclesiastical magisterium and not by private
    judgements

         "Now, in the first place, the Church teaches that in this
    matter we are dealing with a most strict precept of Jesus
    Christ.  For He explicitly ordered His apostles to teach all
    nations to observe all things whatsoever He Himself had
    commanded.

         "Now, not the least important among the commandments of
    Christ is that one by which we are commanded to be incorporated
    by baptism into the Mystical Body of Christ, which is the
    Church, and to remain united to Christ and to His Vicar,
    through whom He Himself governs the Church on earth in a
    visible manner.

         "Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church
    to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless
    refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the
    Roman Pontiff, the vicar of Christ on earth.

         "The Saviour not only gave the precept that all nations
    should enter the Church, but He also established the Church aa
    a means of salvation, without which no one may be able to enter
    the kingdom of eternal glory.

         "In His infinite mercy, God has willed that the effect
    necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation
    which are directed towards man's final end, not by intrinsic
    necessity but only by divine institution, can also be obtained
    in certain circuмstances when these helps are used only in
    intention or desire ("ubi voto solummodo vel desiderio
    adhibeantur").  This we see clearly stated in the Sacred
    Council of Trent, both with reference to the sacrament of
    regeneration and with reference to the sacrament of penance.

          "In its own way, the same thing must be said about the
    Church, insofar as the Church itself is a general help to
    salvation.  Therefore, in order that one may obtain eternal
    salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated
    into the Church actually as a member, but it is required that
    at least he be united to it by intention and desire.

         "However, this desire need not always be explicit, as it
    is in catechumens; but, when a person is involved in invincible
     ignorance, God accepts also an implicit intention ("votum")                    
    which is so called because it is included in that good
    disposition of the soul whereby a person wishes his will to be
    conformed to the will of God.

         "These things are clearly taught in that dogmatic letter
    which was issued by the Sovereign Pontiff, Pope Pius XII, on
    June 29,1943, on the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ.  For in
    this letter the Sovereign Pontiff clearly distinguishes between
    those who are really ("in re") incorporated into the Church as
    members and those who are joined to it only in intention ("in
    voto").

         Discussing the members of whom the Mystical Body is
    composed here on earth, the same August Pontiff says: "Only
    those who have received the laver of regeneration, who profess
    the true faith, who have not miserably separated themselves
    from the fabric of the Church or been expelled by legitimate
    authority by reason of very serious offences, are actually to
    be counted as members of the Church."

         Towards the end of the same encyclical letter, "when most
    affectionately inviting to unity those who do not belong to the
    body of the Catholic Church ("qui ad Ecclesiae Catholica
    compagem non pertinent")", he mentions "those who are ordered
    to the Redeemer's Mystical Body by a sort of unconscious
    desire and intention", and these he by no means excludes from
    eternal salvation, but on the other hand, asserts that "they
    are in a condition in which they cannot be secure about their
    own eternal salvation, since they still lack so many and such
    great heavenly helps to salvation that can be enjoyed only in
    the Catholic Church."

         "With these wise words he reproves both those who exclude
    from eternal salvation all those united to the Church only by
    implicit desire and those who falsely assert that men can be
    saved equally ("aequaliter") in every religion."

         "Nor must we think that any kind of intention of entering  
    the Church is sufficient in order that one may be saved.  It      is
    requisite that the intention by which one is ordered to the
    Church should be informed by perfect charity; and no explicit    
    intention can produce its effect unless the man have
    supernatural faith: "For he who comes to God must believe that  
    He exists and is a rewarder of those who seek Him" (Hebr.
    XI:6).  The council of Trent declares: "Faith is the beginning
    of man's salvation, the foundation and root of all
    justification, without which it is impossible to please God and
    attain to the fellowship of His children."

         A SECOND EXAMPLE is provided by the present occupant of
    the Chair of Peter.  Blinded by his modernist faith, John Paul
    II takes a stance in direct contradiction to his predecessors
    and affirms that it is possible to save one's soul outside of
    the Catholic Church.  In affirming this he makes himself
    anathema, for he blasphemes the holy Spouse of Jesus Christ.[9]
    To quote him directly:

         "It can be said that those who do not belong to the
    visible organism of the Church are [nevertheless] full of a
    particular hope of salvation" (General Audience, May 21, 1980).

         "The oriental patriarchs who are separated from the
    Catholic Church are charged with accomplishing that with which
    the apostles were commissioned" (Nairobi, May 7, 1980).

         "Christians of different confessions are united in the
    Holy Spirit by the bonds of an incomplete communion" (To the
    representatives of the non-Catholics of Japan, February 24,
    1981).

         "Moslems are our brothers, believing in the same unique
    God" (Discourse given to Moslems in Paris, May 31, 1980).

         "The Holy Spirit is even mysteriously present in the
    religions and cultures of non-Christians ...  One could say of
    the Holy Spirit that, so great and generous is this Spirit,
    that each person has part of him, and all have the totality of
    him" (To the International Congress of Pneumatology, March 26,
    1982).

         "The Spirit of Christ does not refuse to use the other
    separated Churches and ecclesiastical communities as a means of
    salvation" (Apostolic Exhortation, "Catechesi tradendae").

         The Holy Spirit not only refuses to use as a means of
    salvation those groups established in heresy or schism, but, as
    I have shown above, for a non-Catholic to be gathered into the
    soul of the Church, it is necessary that he be at least
    implicitly detached from schism or heresy, in which states he
    is presumed to be in good faith.  One should never forget that
    the God who saves is never the "father of lies", of error or of
    schism.  As He Himself explained, "I am the Truth" (John
    XIV:6).

    ENDNOTES:

    [1]  "In order to define and to describe this true Church of
    Jesus Christ - that is to say the "holy Catholic Apostolic and
    Roman Church" - one can find no finer expression, none that is
    more divine, than "the Mystical Body of Christ" (Pope Pius XII,
    Encyclical "Mystici Corporis Christi").

    [2]  Invincible ignorance of these dogmas is easily met with
    among a people and clergy that are badly educated.

    [3]  Whosoever belongs to the Soul of the Church possesses the
    Spirit of Jesus.

    [4]  "Oriens ex alto", a biblical expression designating the
    Messiah (Cf. Zacharias VI:12), the splendor of the eternal
    Light, the Sun of Justice "that enlighteneth EVERY MAN who
    comes into the world" (John I:9).

    [5]  A footnote in The French Bible (of Fillion) tells us that
    this Canticle is the most powerful expression of the most
    intimate mercy of God who wishes to save all men.

    [6]  The distinction is easily seen if one considers the Act of
    Contrition.  An imperfect act of contrition is one which is
    made because of the fear of the loss of heaven and the pains of
    hell.  A perfect act of contrition requires that it be for the
    love of God (i.e., perfect charity) who is infinitely good and
    worthy of all our love.

    [7]  "Suspended a divinis" means forbidden to perform his
    priestly function and "placing the Center under interdict"
    meant that no Catholic could enter its premises.

    [8]  Customary practice would have required that two warnings
    be given to Father Feeney prior to his condemnation.

    [9]  Why is it that they do not understand that they are
    defiling the Holy Mass (I am referring to all those priests who
    have rallied to the new Church, as well as those who have not
    yet done so) in insisting on celebrating it "una cuм famulo tuo
    Papa nostro Joanne Paulo"?  How is it that those who assist and
    communicate at such celebrations do not see that they are
    giving support to this abomination?  Are they so blind that
    they can no longer discern that what is involved is the Body
    and Blood of our Lord? (I Cor. XI:27)  May God forgive them and
    may they come to understand before it is too late.

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41897
    • Reputation: +23940/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Noel Barbara (RIP) on Salvation
    « Reply #4 on: December 14, 2014, 07:13:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Problem for you is that there is no definitive Magisterium on the question of BoD; there's clear tolerance of the opinion in mostly lesser / lower-level sources, with the highest authority being the 1917 Code of Canon Law ... which, as I have pointed out, simply allows the opinion in a very specific pastoral context.

    In addition, there's ZERO support from the Magisterium for your Pelagian heresies, and ZERO support for Father Barbara's heretical statements about "salvation outside the Church"; in fact the Church teaches that there is none.  Father Barbara doesn't even have the intelligence, so blinded is he by his bad will, to make a non-heretical formulation (the way Msgr. Fenton does).

    I love the way you guys always translate Catholic BoD into Pelagian heresy.  With very few exceptions, such as Nishant.