Author Topic: Comparison of TLM and NO Missals (Read 13187 times)

Belloc · « **on:** April 09, 2010, 02:47:21 PM »

Arborman · « **Reply #1 on:** April 09, 2010, 07:27:21 PM »

I went to a NO Mass today because they had confessions beforehand. The priest is a good priest and he said the Mass with faith; but the NO Mass is so lacking, so insufficient. And this was a well done NO Mass!

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #2 on:** April 09, 2010, 08:03:17 PM »

I went to Episcopalian schools from kindergarten through high school. What is frightening is that the service we went to once a week is virtually the same, in many sections, as the NOM; I mean word-for-word! I am not even talking about High Anglican stuff here, folks!

If unquestionably Protestant worship is the same as (or shockingly similar to) the NOM, it does not take a master of philosophy, syllogisms, etc., to conclude: the NOM is Protestant.

Caminus · « **Reply #3 on:** April 09, 2010, 11:22:31 PM »

By privation and ecuмenical intention, yes, but at the same time, there is no denial of any article of faith in the liturgy itself. Even more offensive than that is the fact that the priest is directed to the people and the liturgy becomes a fluid, inculturated event thus destroying supernatural religion.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #4 on:** April 10, 2010, 12:13:31 AM »

Quote from: Caminus

By privation and ecuмenical intention, yes, but at the same time, there is no denial of any article of faith in the liturgy itself. Even more offensive than that is the fact that the priest is directed to the people and the liturgy becomes a fluid, inculturated event thus destroying supernatural religion.

I AGREE 101% WITH THIS STATEMENT. SO TRUE, SO REAL.