What are you talking about? Did Washington know about the Pacific? ...What?!!
.
Do you not know that California was discovered by the Europeans in the 1500s, over 200 years BEFORE the American Revolution?
.The prophecy never mentioned slavery, nor did it label one side better, in describing the cινιℓ ωαr.
.
If you don't want to believe the prophecy, fine. But don't insert straw men into the debate.
1; Is it certain that when one European discovered something that all men thereby know it to exist? I could actually grant that before the important part of the question, does Washington believe the Pacific will be the border of the colonies?
2; In the proposed prophecy, the Union is mentioned and a major trial for it comes from the continent of Africa. The author of the piece believes slavery to be the cause of the cινιℓ ωαr and that the South is inconsequential as the trial is for the Union and success is based on the outcome of the war. No straw man, it's implied.
Seems the author wrote the piece in the 1950's.