This graphic says it all!

It's more complicated than stagflation. There is a dearth of respect and generosity for young men. Young men are increasingly objects of conscious and subconscious scorn, whereas formerly people recognized the critical importance of helping them establish themselves.

The doctrine of Liberalism makes it to where the family cannot support themselves. Capitalism is the sign of Jєωιѕн decadence to the utmost degree, being cut-throat about money.

More companies are closing down locations to get ready for minimum wage increase.
Many jobs are going overseas.

The West supposedly has to endure dumping by the Red Chinese government. Economist magazine asserts this has to be endured. I don't care which bureaucrat is on top. High, high tariffs will be a start. A land like America can provide a good living for every man who wants to work hard. Now in the West a man has to run faster just to keep up. Even Donald Trump sugggests higher taxation on the wealthiest like him. There is no justification for repeated tax cuts for people who overwhelmingly inherit very high levels of wealth. There is an extent to which a lower tax on the wealthy means the lower tax gets paid, but beyond that, there's lifetimes of inbuilt deficits. A higher upper rate caused no notable problems in the Eishenhower era. It doesn't even need to be that high. Cutting tax on the wealthiest and increasing consumption tax like Ted Cruz suggests, just punishes anyone who has to stick to a budget, not just the poorest, and means a man's limit state he's born into, is the state he departs the earth. Taxation bears most heavily on those in the middle, plenty of income and other taxes, on everything from consumption to death, with none of the easy loopholes and deductions for the wealthiest.

Alongside this, there leftist assault on what a man is, and could be. Destroy Western man and his patriarchy, the feminist might rue the somewhat harsher Moslem patriarchy, particularly when she's getting stoned.

The West supposedly has to endure dumping by the Red Chinese government. Economist magazine asserts this has to be endured. I don't care which bureaucrat is on top. High, high tariffs will be a start. A land like America can provide a good living for every man who wants to work hard. Now in the West a man has to run faster just to keep up. Even Donald Trump sugggests higher taxation on the wealthiest like him. There is no justification for repeated tax cuts for people who overwhelmingly inherit very high levels of wealth. There is an extent to which a lower tax on the wealthy means the lower tax gets paid, but beyond that, there's lifetimes of inbuilt deficits. A higher upper rate caused no notable problems in the Eishenhower era. It doesn't even need to be that high. Cutting tax on the wealthiest and increasing consumption tax like Ted Cruz suggests, just punishes anyone who has to stick to a budget, not just the poorest, and means a man's limit state he's born into, is the state he departs the earth. Taxation bears most heavily on those in the middle, plenty of income and other taxes, on everything from consumption to death, with none of the easy loopholes and deductions for the wealthiest.

Alongside this, there leftist assault on what a man is, and could be. Destroy Western man and his patriarchy, the feminist might rue the somewhat harsher Moslem patriarchy, particularly when she's getting stoned.

I do not think taxes need to be raised on the wealthy per se, except in wartime it would be raised a little. I will however say that yes a nation needs high mercantile policies of buying domestically while also making businesses not do a lock-out, sack and clean up the factory conditions on the one hand; on the other hand the worker should not strike, be in a private trade union or demand too much on the other. Government policy can placate this by having government unions who do not strike and having councils of workers voice their demands to management while also nationalising important industries if they do not placate national policies. On the other hand we could raise the standard of living of regions such as Iran and Latin America by heavy trade and have a modernised welfare system that is efficient and gives the man food and clothing so that he can be the breadwinner and support his family.

Feminism is Marxist and makes me sick since women are inferior to men in all rational fields.

Quote from: Traditional Guy 20

Feminism is Marxist and makes me sick since women are inferior to men in all rational fields.

Um.   Are you serious?

The statement is precise and correct.

Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey

More companies are closing down locations to get ready for minimum wage increase.
Many jobs are going overseas.

This is a total myth. We are far past the point of factories packing up and going overseas for cheap labor or competing against migrants for jobs. Those jobs simply don't exist anymore because they're now being performed by machines, robots, and software etc.  It makes no monetary sense for a company to pay 5 people hourly what a computer or machine can do for merely the cost of an occasional repair. This is happening even in places like China. No one is immune from Automation because the technology is available to all.

There is now a robot (pepper) available in Japan that is replacing secretaries by those that have the money to support it...I mean I can see some of the reasons why...this is a job which is usually exclusively for women. And sometimes they quickly become the hardest people to deal with for both customers and employees...