Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: EPA River disaster Intentional? Is this the smoking gun proof?  (Read 1109 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Truth is Eternal

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1768
  • Reputation: +774/-1991
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "I Think it is Time Cathinfo Has a Public Profession of Belief." "Thank you for publicly affirming the necessity of believing, without innovations, all Infallibly Defined Dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church."

    Offline PerEvangelicaDicta

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2049
    • Reputation: +1285/-0
    • Gender: Female
    EPA River disaster Intentional? Is this the smoking gun proof?
    « Reply #1 on: August 12, 2015, 09:32:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Here's the article discussed. LINK

    Quote
    A week before The EPA disastrously leaked millions of gallons of toxic waste into The Animas River in Colorado, this letter to the editor was published in The Silverton Standard & The Miner local newspaper, authored by a retired geologist detailing verbatim, how EPA would foul the Animas River on purpose in order to secure superfund money...

        "But make no mistake, within seven days, all of the 500gpm flow will return to Cememnt Creek. Contamination may actually increase... The "grand experiment" in my opinion will fail.

         
        And guess what [EPA's] Mr. Hestmark will say then?

         
        Gee, "Plan A" didn't work so I guess we will have to build a treat¬ment plant at a cost to taxpayers of $100 million to $500 million (who knows).

         
        Reading between the lines, I believe that has been the EPA's plan all along"

     
    Sound like something a government entity would do? Just ask Lois Lerner...

    As we concluded previously,

        The EPA actually has no concern for the environment, they just happen to use the environment as a cover story to create laws and gain an advantage for the companies that lobbied for exemptions to the agency’s regulations, and to collect money in fines. There are solutions outside the common government paradigm, and that is mainly the ability for individuals, not governments, to hold polluters personally and financially accountable.



    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7206
    • Reputation: +2019/-196
    • Gender: Female
    EPA River disaster Intentional? Is this the smoking gun proof?
    « Reply #2 on: August 13, 2015, 06:15:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • They want people to pay for water.  
    To live with the Saints in Heaven is all bliss and glory....To live with the saints on Earth is just another story!  (unknown)

    Offline Stubborn

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9385
    • Reputation: +3724/-838
    • Gender: Male
    EPA River disaster Intentional? Is this the smoking gun proof?
    « Reply #3 on: August 13, 2015, 07:23:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PerEvangelicaDicta


    Here's the article discussed. LINK


    Wow, great find!

    The whole thing is a giant scam!
    For a small gain they travel far; for eternal life many will scarcely lift a foot from the ground. - Thomas A Kempis

    Offline Peter15and1

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 282
    • Reputation: +106/-28
    • Gender: Male
    EPA River disaster Intentional? Is this the smoking gun proof?
    « Reply #4 on: August 13, 2015, 07:40:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My initial reaction to this thread was that the letter to the editor was probably an internet fake, like so many other things I come across.  However, the newspaper's website confirms its validity:

    http://www.silvertonstandard.com/news.php?id=847


    Offline PerEvangelicaDicta

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2049
    • Reputation: +1285/-0
    • Gender: Female
    EPA River disaster Intentional? Is this the smoking gun proof?
    « Reply #5 on: August 13, 2015, 07:45:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Peter15and1
    My initial reaction to this thread was that the letter to the editor was probably an internet fake, like so many other things I come across.  However, the newspaper's website confirms its validity:

    http://www.silvertonstandard.com/news.php?id=847


    I thought the same!  Then I found a link to the paper's confirmation in the ZH comments.

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16