Just want to clear one thing up.  I asked Matthew to delete that for Dawn's sake, since she was so upset about it.  I hope it all works out well for you.  Bye.

Why don't you just email him, roscoe, and tell him 1M of your closest friends agree with your sentiments?  While you are at it, I think you should email the thousands upon thousands of people who have publicly repeated the same story in recent decades.  There is no doubt this is truly a worthwhile cause and your crusade will be time well spent.

 Believe it or not, I don't wish to harm you; only to stop you.  

 :shocked:

Acc to Alex this is not true anymore-- the Alt media is now bigger than MSM.

Quote from: Trinity

 Believe it or not, I don't wish to harm you; only to stop you.  

 :shocked:

she going to stop you???? and she calls me poisonous???

I think, ladies/gentleman, we see who the really vindictive and angry person is...we see who has the cult mentality, no?

Quote from: Trinity

It doesn't bother me in the least, Eamon.  Those words are for you  and other people don't have a clue what they are about.  The best they could do is guess, just as they might have guessed at the sub rosa messages you've given me.  And don't give me "you should have pmed me"  YOU should have pmed me.  But since you want all to be transparent, be glad I am keeping it this hidden.  If you will go back to my letter you will see I ascribed none of it to you or anyone else.  Believe it or not, I don't wish to harm you; only to stop you.  If we can agree on that, we can have done with this foolishness and get on to the healing.

Since most on this forum have no clear idea what you're talking about or even care, why air dirty laundry in public? This is clearly a private matter.

why air it out? because the woan plays all "little miss innocent and pious" but is really rather nasty and vindicitive...yet, give her time, she will accuse you of what she does, says and thinks-it is I think the term is, transferance.....

we all are sympathetic with her rather difficult past, but not behaviors.....when one is abused, of note, one might actually become either possesed or more likely, oppressed...so, there is a good chance that she has more deep seated issues that lets pray, do not come out more....

Example-she was nailed, by me and others-on her americanism, yet she attacks and derides us for calling for a Catholic Social order and a resultant state,etc....now, becaus I note this and other issues-like on a pro-SSPX site it is not cool to attack SSPX, ABL and have obsessive conversations on SVism, I am now "poisonous", yet her attitude and behavior is far more...even other SV are turned off by her and her ways.....one feels she is perhaps unbalanced or even evil...

take note, though, that you attack Trinity, you wil lbe Myrna, Mer and likel, overa few hrs, several ignores....not by chance, they are a rather nasty little gang of cultics and coordinate, hiding behind their ooooooooohh so piousness, a rather angry bitterness.

Not to say all Sv are this way, no, not in the least.....you will find good converstaion, debate, etc from some ehre that are decent and honorable...gladius, Dawn, Alexandria and many others....

Spreading fear and waffle.

He is able to do so, and he's rather well known because there is a public thirsty for this type of message, and he is not violating any laws.  

That being said, he and many other in some cases cross the line and face the possibility of being sued for damage to peoples reputation and in many of these cases, I'd watch in delight.  

So many people think that freedom of speech means you can say anything you like about anything and anyone in total impunity without risking to be sued for damages to reputations.

Quote from: Clovis

Spreading fear and waffle.

He is able to do so, and he's rather well known because there is a public thirsty for this type of message, and he is not violating any laws.  

That being said, he and many other in some cases cross the line and face the possibility of being sued for damage to peoples reputation and in many of these cases, I'd watch in delight.  

So many people think that freedom of speech means you can say anything you like about anything and anyone in total impunity without risking to be sued for damages to reputations.

Not sure why you would "watch in delight", but, as one that has been proved to largely buy into whatever the mainstream media dishes out, guess AJ and others like him-for whatever faults and mistakes-really stands as a problem for you...

do you watch in delight as mainstream media gets sued, called to the carpet,etc? They ceased to do real, honest reporting and fact finding along ago....