Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed  (Read 2074 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 13825
  • Reputation: +5568/-865
  • Gender: Male
More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
« on: August 27, 2014, 05:17:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 40% of U.S. on Welfare; Obamacare Expands Welfare by 23 Million; More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed

    As a result of Obamacare Medicaid expansion coupled with means-tested Obamacare assistance, I estimate welfare rolls expanded from 35.4% of the population in 2012 to  about 40% in 2014.

    Let's go through the math to see how I make that estimate.

    The latest welfare statistics are from year-end 2012. Those figures show 35.4 Percent: 109,631,000 on Welfare.

        109,631,000 living in households taking federal welfare benefits as of the end of 2012, according to the Census Bureau, equaled 35.4 percent of all 309,467,000 people living in the United States at that time.

        When those receiving benefits from non-means-tested federal programs — such as Social Security, Medicare, unemployment and veterans benefits — were added to those taking welfare benefits, it turned out that 153,323,000 people were getting federal benefits of some type at the end of 2012.

        Subtract the 3,297,000 who were receiving veterans' benefits from the total, and that leaves 150,026,000 people receiving non-veterans' benefits.

        The 153,323,000 total benefit-takers at the end of 2012, said the Census Bureau, equaled 49.5 percent of the population. The 150,026,000 taking benefits other than veterans' benefits equaled about 48.5 percent of the population.

        In 2012, according to the Census Bureau, there were 103,087,000 full-time year-round workers in the United States (including 16,606,000 full-time year-round government workers). Thus, the welfare-takers outnumbered full-time year-round workers by 6,544,000.

    Breakdown by Category

        82,679,000 Medicaid
        51,471,000 Food Stamps
        22,526,000 Women, Infants and Children Program
        20,355,000 Supplemental Security Income
        13,267,000 Public Housing or Housing Subsidies
          5,442,000 Temporary Assistance to Needy Families
          4,517,000 Other Forms of Federal Cash Assistance


    Read more Here

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #1 on: September 01, 2014, 11:26:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What a sad state we are in.  

    Marsha


    Offline Frances

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2660
    • Reputation: +2241/-22
    • Gender: Female
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #2 on: September 01, 2014, 07:22:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :dancing-banana:
    What about those who receive some form of govt. assistance AND are employed full-time?  
     St. Francis Xavier threw a Crucifix into the sea, at once calming the waves.  Upon reaching the shore, the Crucifix was returned to him by a crab with a curious cross pattern on its shell.  

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1776
    • Reputation: +1335/-419
    • Gender: Male
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #3 on: September 01, 2014, 08:26:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Social Security retiree payments are not government benefits or federal largesse or anything else of the sort. Rather, they constitute partial reimbursement for decades of confiscation of an individual's earnings. Please be more judicious in your choice of words.

    I for one have never accepted a dime of welfare money or anything else resembling a payment whose source is the unwillingly commandeered wealth of other Americans; God willing, I never shall. Neither I nor anyone else receiving "retiree" Social Security ought to be lumped in with those who live off tax revenue extorted from the remaining Americans who haven't been put out of work by Obama's administration and those preceding it for half a century. Those traitorous servants of America's hostile elite have succeeded in their historic aim of displacing native-born Americans from possession of the country that their forbears built and of handing it over to the wretched refuse of every un-Christian and anti-Christian shore on the planet—and making us pay the bill for our own displacement in the process.

    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #4 on: September 01, 2014, 11:59:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Frances
    :dancing-banana:
    What about those who receive some form of govt. assistance AND are employed full-time?  


    Do you mean the "working poor" who get WIC, SNAP, or health benefits?

    Marsha


    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #5 on: September 02, 2014, 12:14:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: claudel
    Social Security retiree payments are not government benefits or federal largesse or anything else of the sort. Rather, they constitute partial reimbursement for decades of confiscation of an individual's earnings. Please be more judicious in your choice of words.


    I think he was just quoting the survey, not expressing a personal opinion.  I think everyone BUT the gov't knows that SS is just the returning of a portion of the money that was taken from employees w/o their consent.  As to vet benefits they have been EARNED and are not welfare in any sense of the word.  Medicare?  I'm not sure about that one, and unemployment I have qualms about - at least for the extended length that it can go, I read somewhere that in some states you can get it for 99 weeks!  I don't know if it varies by state but here in AZ unemployment is a pittance, it probably would not even cover a months rent, which is surprising high here considering that housing prices are depressed.

    This mess is what happens when government get in the "charity" business, it traps people in a cycle of poverty, keeping them on the plantation.

    Marsha

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #6 on: September 02, 2014, 12:16:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: claudel
    Social Security retiree payments are not government benefits or federal largesse or anything else of the sort. Rather, they constitute partial reimbursement for decades of confiscation of an individual's earnings. Please be more judicious in your choice of words.

    I for one have never accepted a dime of welfare money or anything else resembling a payment whose source is the unwillingly commandeered wealth of other Americans; God willing, I never shall. Neither I nor anyone else receiving "retiree" Social Security ought to be lumped in with those who live off tax revenue extorted from the remaining Americans who haven't been put out of work by Obama's administration and those preceding it for half a century. Those traitorous servants of America's hostile elite have succeeded in their historic aim of displacing native-born Americans from possession of the country that their forbears built and of handing it over to the wretched refuse of every un-Christian and anti-Christian shore on the planet and making us pay the bill for our own displacement in the process.


    Very well said, Claudel!
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline claudel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1776
    • Reputation: +1335/-419
    • Gender: Male
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #7 on: September 02, 2014, 08:51:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Cantarella
    Very well said, Claudel!


    Thank you, Cantarella.

    May I add that I am a veteran, and as such I denounce and condemn the overwhelming bulk of payouts to veterans. People here at CI need to stop thinking of servants of the US war machine as heroes and defenders of our shores. They are nothing of the sort. They constitute the sharp spearhead of the perpetual, Tribally directed US aggression against other peoples' shores and those who defend those shores.

    There is a modicuм of practical sense (of moral sense less so) in favor of the argument that those who have been permanently disabled or who require either limited or lifelong care as a result of injuries sustained in killing foreigners and wrecking their economies should have their health care and other basic needs funded by the same overburdened taxpayers who paid for the vets' overcompensated active duty "service." But the kind of enlistment-to-grave welfare program, invariably extended to spouse and dependent offspring, that is now used as an enticement to get those with highly developed layabout inclinations to sign on the dotted line makes such people little else than permanent welfare kings and queens in uniform.

    Even in the Vietnam War, a sizable number of those seeking medical care while on active duty in Vietnam did so to get treatment for venereal disease. In the course of my own time in Vietnam, I learned of one guy who got an unusual, highly resistant strain of gonorrhea that led to extended hospitalization followed by … wait for it … honorable discharge and the awarding of a status of total disability (even though he was nothing of the sort), which conferred a lifetime's worth of free medical care, permanent access to government-supplied housing, and a check in the mail (indexed to inflation!) every month. Some hero!

    I know, too, that far too many of my fellow Vietnam vets—voluntary enlistees, mind you, not just draftees like me; but like me, fortunately, unscathed returnees to civilian life—have applied for and received the status of partial disability, with its accompanying payouts, despite having no observable disabilities whatsoever. They are assisted in applying for these benefits by various veterans' organizations, some of which are actual government agencies and others of which are NGOs largely or partly funded by taxpayer cash.

    Land of the free and home of the brave? What land is that, please?

    I know that my marked distaste for the military and its adventurism and for payouts to veterans is not widely shared, but Trads especially need to take off their blinders anent what government and media talking heads absurdly and dishonestly refer to as US interests overseas. (If these liars were truly interested in the safety and welfare of ordinary Americans, they wouldn't continue to import millions of foreigners to commit crimes and take our country away from us.) In plain terms this amounts to one thing only: the sick belief of a collection of immoral monsters and their camp followers that the use of deadly force to make them rich and powerful at the expense of the rest of the world is always and everywhere justified for no reason other than it's what makes them feel good. The only real difference between US aggression and Arab, Mongol, Hittite, Egyptian, Khazar, Chinese, Russian, British, and Maori aggression is that US armaments can kill more people faster and cheaper than was ever before imaginable—and with the glamour of a foreign-born president who's a member of a vibrant minority group to boot! Whoopee!
    ____________________

    I understand Marielar's concerns about unemployment compensation, especially its present-day Obamanoid variety, which is a reward extended mainly to minorities and illegal aliens who can demonstrate that they once worked, even if only a day or two ten years ago, and had taxes and SS "insurance" assessments withheld from their one and only paycheck. Such federalized unemployment compensation is now a total scam. But as originally conceived and as executed through at least the eighties and early nineties, all unemployment compensation programs (except the ludicrous overcompensation to largely worthless federal employees) were administered state by state. In at least some cases they were 100 percent funded by employee withholding assessments and mandated employer contributions (by and large the biggest part of the funding). Thus, for a strictly limited period of time, they frequently assisted only those who were (1) willing and able to work and (2) out of work through no fault of their own, and most important, the funding came from the workers themselves and private employers.

    In these cases, though unemployment insurance was certainly, like social security, misguided as well as being waste-, fraud-, and abuse-infested, it wasn't truly a giveaway program to benefit the undeserving and unworthy.


    Offline St Jude Thaddeus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 857
    • Reputation: +185/-24
    • Gender: Male
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #8 on: September 02, 2014, 09:49:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This large number of people on govt. handouts virtually guarantees a victory for the Democratic Party in the 2016 elections.

    Which is exactly why they get so many people on govt. "assistance."
    St. Jude, who, disregarding the threats of the impious, courageously preached the doctrine of Christ,
    pray for us.

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    More on Welfare Than Full-Time-Employed
    « Reply #9 on: September 02, 2014, 11:03:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Somehow my post from yesterday may have got deleted.

    This is the way the ruling elites likes it.  More people on the
    welfare rolls, more votes for them to keep themselves in
    perpetual power.  Bringing in legal and illegal immigrants
    to do jobs at slave wages.  Get several generations use to
    living off the government and have no desire to work.
    Just march down to the voting precinct with the rest of their
    comrades and vote democrat, democrat all the way.
    Nothing to do all day unless you are a welfare single mom.
    End up in a life of crime and gangs.  Getting arrested and
    work for the privately owned prison system enriching the
    judicial system and lawyers too.
    It does not have to be this way.  This is the way the
    ruling elites want society to be, meanwhile they escape
    to their gated and guarded communities.