Does anyone here believe the stories of guillotines hidden at Ft. Hood and other military bases?

I'm torn on the issue.

 :smoke-pot:

FEMA is ready: http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/new_world_order/news.php?q=1222050014

I saw this approximately 5 years ago. There is apparently a large stockpile of portable prison cell units for use as required. Guillotines? Wouldn't be surprised.

Actually, I was just "pinning" (I don't Pinterest but too many friends think Wikileaks is a "terrorist organization", so I joined Pinterest and started putting up pretty pictures that link to easy-to-follow articles).

Eg, earlier this year, Scientific American published about DNA harvesting of criminals, and how little of that data was stored because of storage problems. (Heh, we know better now, thanks to Snowden).

Interesting piece, especially given that Wikileaks exposed the U.S. (HRC in particular) secretly demanded DNA samples of all world leaders a few years ago. I hope that if one read the nice SciAm article about DNA collection of criminals, then the even older article about Hillary wanting world leaders' DNA, someone might start to wonder why the government is collecting all this DNA ...and if it stops at "criminals" and world leaders.

So my next pretty "pin" was to a recent article from The Atlantic with the byline: "In the not-too-distant future, they may provide something more as well—the basis for the creation of personalized bioweapons that could take down a president and leave no trace." ZINGER!

They don't need a gas chamber or guillotine; and as for how they would procure Americans' DNA, I "pinned" how the U.S. used a FAKE vaccination program to locate Bin Laden's family. And those doctors aren't even American; can't be threatened with an audit, or a loss of license; the US doctors can be extorted into collecting everyone's DNA! There's a similar article at Scientific American, only they merely "worry" about the ethics, unlike The Atlantic which seems to understand the technology is here now (though the byline says "in the not-too-distant future." They mean, "yesterday".)

And there's another "pin" I will post, about how a DNA bio-weapon could even more easily target entire races for some good old-fashioned "ethnic cleansing", no explosions necessary!

But anyway, to your point: the U.S. could probably kill anyone without a trace using a bio-weapon geared towards DNA, and harvest organs cleanly. Isn't that special!

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/guillotines.asp

Snopes is less than worthless when it comes to anything politically sensitive. They are a mouthpiece for the Borg.

I would only add that I have no idea, but Max Keiser, another Jєω from Alex Jones's nαzι hunting "PrisonPlanet", has called for a return to the use of the guillotine --- seriously. I heard him saying it myself.

If Nancy Peℓσѕι, Joe Biden, Janet Napolitano, and other marranos join Max Keiser and call for a return to the use of the guillotine, it could be something for which they would create a budget allotment.

 :thinking:

For the record, I never inhaled!  Really!  
Guillotines are awfully messy.  I think they have much neater methods in store.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/guillotines.asp

I would like to point out that this snopes article, in decrying the lack of positive proof for guillotines, offer none of their own either, they not-so-subtly use guilt by association, making fun of 'FEMA camps' and other 'cօռspιʀαcιҽs' and that's their proof(!). That's it, QED! Nothing comes form *those* websites *snort* *chuckle*

That's not an argument.

I would also point out it is indeed difficult to prove a negative, but still, snopes is using the tactics they decry.

And as for 'FEMA camps' that snopes flippantly dismisses, I'd recommend you look into them more. They're real.

I didn't believe in them either.