What evidence is there nukes don’t exist? I understand how the moon landings were faked, not many people had to be in on the actual lie. To many people have seen nukes detonated in the 50’s out west, after the detonations in Nevada, radioactive ash fell on the city. Besides, if nukes don’t exist, why doesn’t a country like China have a crack at the Russians and take Siberia from them? Only nukes are keeping the Chicoms off the Russians.

I posted the links.  In terms of "seeing" nukes go off, the answer is in the links, that the early "tests" were simulated with large piles of TNT.  In fact, whenever the US was doing tests for a while, they always had a "control" detonation which was huge amounts of stacked-up TNT to "compare" the two explosions ... which always were nearly identical.  As for some radioactivity, they could easily have just put some radioactive material into the pile that went off.  We're told that even a dirty bomb would make entire regions uninhabitable for thousands of years, and yet nothing of the sort happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  Read the link from Makow about those events.  As for why the Chicoms don't just "take" Siberia, there are other considerations besides a "nuke deterrent", so that is a particularly weak argument.  Even conventional weapons, the prospect of war with Russia, the economic impact of such a war, etc. ... would all be reasonable deterrents from taking such action now.  Chinese could also just walk in right now and take Taiwan, and there's no way that anyone would nuke them as a result.  Biden administration basically just gave them the green light to go in if they want to, but they have opted not to for various other considerations.