Author Topic: Why Sungenis's Geocentrism model is wrong (Read 29950 times)

Augustinus · « **Reply #45 on:** March 30, 2017, 02:32:22 PM »

Quote from: mw2016 on March 30, 2017, 01:50:58 PM

Note to cassini: you do not need to type or paste a WALL OF TEXT to answer a simple question.
So, now we have, from your very verbose response, that you do not believe the earth is rotating, and that you believe the sun is, in fact, rotating about the earth, along with all the rest of the "universe" in the ether.
Therefore, you have proved my point:
You accept the heliocentric distance to the sun of 93 million miles.
Therefore, according to YOU, the sun is traversing a 584 million mile long circular path around the earth EVERY 24-hours.
THAT is more absurd than a flat earth plane with the Firmament above, enclosing the earth from the waters of the great deep, with the sun and moon and stars circling above, could ever be.

Again: draw a physical model of the south celestial pole and its relation to the North Pole AND explain our ability to circuмnavigate the world in relation to the south celestial pole.
You COULD posit our land mass is within a dome that exceeds its diameter, and that the star fields spin on a central axis that becomes altered by perspective, but then you destroy circuмnavigation. You could posit a disc earth with continents radiating from the center, but you displace the South Pole. The only physical workable model is the sphere.

Truth is Eternal · « **Reply #46 on:** March 30, 2017, 04:45:07 PM »

Quote from: Augustinus on March 30, 2017, 02:32:22 PM

Again: draw a physical model of the south celestial pole and its relation to the North Pole AND explain our ability to circuмnavigate the world in relation to the south celestial pole.
You COULD posit our land mass is within a dome that exceeds its diameter, and that the star fields spin on a central axis that becomes altered by perspective, but then you destroy circuмnavigation. You could posit a disc earth with continents radiating from the center, but you displace the South Pole. The only physical workable model is the sphere.

The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it.

mw2016 · « **Reply #47 on:** March 31, 2017, 10:30:12 PM »

Cassini - here is one your earth pics you posted from NASA. We'll be charitable and assume it is real...*cough*

I use this one because it illustrates one of the things that brought me to flat earth.

Can you see what it is?

If you look at the curvature in this photo of only the Great Lakes, you will quickly notice that if you extend that curve the full 360 degrees, it will not nearly be large enough to encompass the earth.

Game over. Earth is flat.

http://www.fropky.com/jaw-dropping-images-our-planet-nasa-vt59792-20.html

Augustinus · « **Reply #48 on:** April 01, 2017, 12:11:25 AM »

Quote from: mw2016 on March 31, 2017, 10:30:12 PM

Cassini - here is one your earth pics you posted from NASA. We'll be charitable and assume it is real...*cough*

I use this one because it illustrates one of the things that brought me to flat earth.

Can you see what it is?

If you look at the curvature in this photo of only the Great Lakes, you will quickly notice that if you extend that curve the full 360 degrees, it will not nearly be large enough to encompass the earth.

Game over. Earth is flat.

http://www.fropky.com/jaw-dropping-images-our-planet-nasa-vt59792-20.html

Fisheye?

mw2016 · « **Reply #49 on:** April 01, 2017, 01:07:54 AM »

Quote from: Augustinus on April 01, 2017, 12:11:25 AM

Fisheye?

Fisheyes make straight lines curved.
So, you're saying the horizon line in the photo is actually straight, in reality.
Which it actually is, of course - that's why it is called a horizon, because it IS horizontal.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Why Sungenis's Geocentrism model is wrong (Read 29950 times)

Augustinus

Re: Why Sungenis's Geocentrism model is wrong

Truth is Eternal

Re: Why Sungenis's Geocentrism model is wrong

mw2016

Re: Why Sungenis's Geocentrism model is wrong

Augustinus

Re: Why Sungenis's Geocentrism model is wrong

mw2016

Re: Why Sungenis's Geocentrism model is wrong